Cognitive Bias Modification for OCD
Cognitive Bias Modification as an Adjunctive Treatment for Treatment-Refractory OCD
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will conduct the development and preliminary evaluation of Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation (CBM-I) and Approach Avoidance Training (AAT) as augmentations to treatment as usual for OCD and related disorders. CBM-I refers to computerized interventions designed to directly manipulate interpretation bias through repeated practice on a training task, thereby inducing cognitive changes in a relatively automatic or implicit manner. In AAT, automatic approach tendencies toward feared stimuli are re-trained. Specifically, this study will examine the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes associated with CBM-I and AAT. Adults with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and related disorders will be recruited from a treatment program for these disorders and participants will be randomly assigned to either receive: 1) eight sessions of CBM-I or eight sessions of psychoeducation as a control condition, or 2) AAT or eight sessions of an inactive (sham) version of the AAT training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2024
CompletedJuly 24, 2024
July 1, 2024
5.3 years
January 2, 2019
July 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Average Score on Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire
Measure of interpretation biases, specifically: Inflated Responsibility/Overestimation of Threat, Perfectionism/Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Importance/Control of Thoughts. 44-item self-report measure, items scored 1-7 and summed; greater scores indicate greater severity.
Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in Average Score on Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Change in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale
Weeks 0, 4, and 8
Change in Suicide Implicit Association Test
Weeks 0, 2, and 4
Change in Average Score on Depressive Symptom Index Suicidality Subscale. There are 4 items scored from 0-3 with greater numbers indicating greater severity.
Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
Week 0
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Cognitive bias modification with treatment as usual
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive usual treatment in the program and 8 sessions of a computerized cognitive training targeting interpretation bias
Psychoeducation with treatment as usual
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive usual treatment in the program and 8 sessions of psychoeducation
Approach avoidance training with treatment as usual
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive usual treatment in the program and 8 sessions of a computerized cognitive training targeting automatic approach tendencies
Inactive sham approach avoidance training
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in this group will receive usual treatment in the program and 8 sessions of a sham approach avoidance training
Interventions
Eight sessions of scenario-based CBM-I training for OCD will be administered, based on the widely-used paradigm of ambiguous scenario training developed by Mathews and Mackintosh (2000), in which participants are presented with scenarios that are ambiguous in whether or not they are threatening. Participants will complete a computer task consisting of a series of written scenarios designed to improve interpretation and attributional biases; these scenarios conclude with word fragments, which participants must fill in to resolve the ambiguity.
Eight sessions of psychoeducation will be administered, which will describe symptoms of anxiety, the nature of biased thinking in anxiety, and summarize common psychosocial as well as pharmacological treatments for anxiety. The sessions will provide relevant information but will not provide training in changing thinking styles.
Eight sessions of this computerized training program will be used to train approach tendencies, following previously validated procedures (Najmi, Kuckertz, \& Amir, 2010). During the training program, participants will view a series of these images and be prompted to push or pull a joystick according to prompts on the screen, instead of the content of the picture. Avoidance will be stimulated through both pushing away (images on the screen will decrease in size upon the joystick being pushed), and approach will be stimulated through pulling towards pictures (images will increase in size to simulate approach).
Eight sessions of the approach avoidance training will be administered, however the percentage of push vs pull trials will be altered in this sham version of the training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Currently receiving treatment at the McLean Hospital OCD Institute
- For CBM-I condition only: report a score of at least 131 on the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 upon admission to the OCD Institute
- For AAT condition only: endorse score of at least 7 on the DOCS subscale #1 (contamination subscale) upon admission to the OCD Institute
- Able to complete a computer task for 20 minutes
- Consent to main OCD Institute study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Currently undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
- Current symptoms of acute mania or psychosis
- A reported diagnosis at admission of a psychotic disorder
- History of traumatic brain injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mclean Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2019
First Posted
January 10, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 23, 2024
Study Completion
July 23, 2024
Last Updated
July 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07