The Effect of Tub vs Sponge Bathing on the Comfort of Premature Infants
ComfortNEO
The Effect of Tub Bathing and Sponge Bathing on Neonatal Comfort and Physiological Parameters in Late Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The integumentary system protects the underlying body from the external environment, such as shocks, temperature, ultraviolet radiation, chemicals, and other threats. There is a considerable body of clinical evidence highlighting the importance of the stratum corneum and its barrier functions, which are especially beneficial for newborns. Given the dramatic transition from the aqueous womb to the dry terrestrial environment at birth, studies describing adaptations made by the skin barrier within the first month of life assume greater importance. The skin of the baby is morphologically and functionally different from the skin of adults. Neonatal skin is thinner, more fragile, and drier than adult skin; it is difficult to maintain fluid-electrolyte balance and temperature regulation. Notwithstanding, structure and function of skin continues to improve during the first months and even years of life. Special care procedures are nonetheless necessary to ensure healthy development, to protect the skin from irritation and reddening, and to help the newborn feel well. Therefore, this study, taking the form of a randomized controlled trial, aims to examine the effectiveness of tub bathing and sponge bathing on the physiological parameters (heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature) and comfort of late preterm infants. Increasing comfort and physiological stabilization in premature infants during neonatal care improves their neurophysiological development. Bathing procedures that support this development and will not expose the newborn to stress should be preferred.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2019
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
January 1, 2019
1 year
December 26, 2018
January 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Neonatal Comfort
Data on comfort behavior was collected by a second researcher and by research nurses who had been trained by the lead researcher. Those responsible for data collection were blinded as to the allocation of infants they were assessing. The ComfortNeo scale was used to measure newborns' comfort. The ComfortNeo is a Likert-type scale consisting of six parameters: alertness, calmness/agitation, crying, body movement, facial tension, and (body) muscle tone. The lowest score that can be obtained using this scale is 6, and the highest score is 30. Scores in the range of 6 to 13 indicate that the newborn is comfortable, while scores 14-30 are indicative of pain or distress in the newborn, thus necessitating comforting. Comfort was inferred based on infant behavior 10 minutes before bathing and 10 minutes after bathing.
An average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Heart Rate
An average of 1 year
Oxygen Saturation
An average of 1 year
Respiration Rate
An average of 1 year
Body Temperature
An average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Tub Bathing
EXPERIMENTALIn this group, preterm infants were given tub bathing.
Sponge Bathing
ACTIVE COMPARATORSeparate cotton cloths were prepared for each body area in the sponge bath. The room temperature was set to 26-27°C to prevent hypothermia. The temperature of the water used for sponge bathing was set to 37-38°C. Alongside the bath, the infant was placed on a flat, protected surface and washed from a bowl of water, using the same mild cleanser. The eyes, face, and head were wiped and dried while the baby was wrapped in a blanket. The wrap was opened so that body parts could be washed, dried, and then immediately rewrapped, after which infants were diapered.
Interventions
The infant's face was washed and dried while still wrapped before being immersed. The water level in the tub was set at approximately 9-12 cm or deep enough to cover the baby's shoulders. A folded cloth towel was placed into the tub before bathing. The temperature of the bath water was controlled using a special water thermometer and adjusted to 37-38°C. The infant was held securely; the head and neck were supported on the researcher's forearm, and the shoulder was grasped using the researcher's thumb and finger. Cleaning was performed using a soft cloth and baby skin cleaner. The front and back areas were cleaned without turning the infant. The newborn was safely removed from the water and wrapped in a clean towel.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All inborn infants with a gestational age of 34 weeks and 0 days to 36 weeks and 6 days (late preterm) were eligible to participate in this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants were excluded from the study if they were connected to
- a mechanical ventilator,
- if they had bathed in the last 12 hours,
- if within the first 78 hours of the postoperative period,
- had a central catheter,
- had received either a sedative and/or muscle relaxant,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz Universty
Antalya, 07000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Bryanton J, Walsh D, Barrett M, Gaudet D. Tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing for the newborn. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;33(6):704-12. doi: 10.1177/0884217504270651.
PMID: 15561658BACKGROUNDLoring C, Gregory K, Gargan B, LeBlanc V, Lundgren D, Reilly J, Stobo K, Walker C, Zaya C. Tub bathing improves thermoregulation of the late preterm infant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Mar;41(2):171-179. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PMID: 22375955BACKGROUNDTasdemir HI, Efe E. The effect of tub bathing and sponge bathing on neonatal comfort and physiological parameters in late preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov;99:103377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
PMID: 31442786DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Emine EFE
Akdeniz University Children's Health and the Nursing Department
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Physiological data was collected by nurses trained by the lead researcher. Data on neonatal comfort behavior was collected by a second researcher and by research nurses who had been trained by the lead researcher. Those responsible for data collection were blinded as to the allocation of infants they were assessing.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2018
First Posted
January 8, 2019
Study Start
November 20, 2015
Primary Completion
November 29, 2016
Study Completion
November 29, 2016
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The data sharing plans for the current study are unknown and will be made available at a later date