NCT03794726

Brief Summary

This study will compare orthodontic molar protraction with and without adjunctive periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontic (PAOO) surgery prior to orthodontic tooth movement. To the investigators' knowledge, this type of molar retraction in adult patients has not been compared with and without the adjunctive use of PAOO for differences in clinical linear tooth movement and patient centered outcomes (discomfort, change in daily activities, satisfaction with esthetic outcomes) in a controlled study.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
30mo left

Started Jul 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2019

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Expected
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2027

1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Orthodontic tooth movementMolar protractionPeriodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodonticsPatient-centered outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Linear millimeters of molar tooth movement

    Compare the clinical linear molar tooth movement over a 3 month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontic therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).

    From baseline to 3months

  • Tooth angulation as measured radiographically

    Compare the radiographic mesial inclination of the molar to be protracted over a 3-month time frame (Baseline to 3 months) between two groups receiving orthodontics therapy alone or in combination with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO).

    From baseline to 3months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Periodontal probing depth

    From baseline to 3months

  • Periodontal clinical attachment level

    From baseline to 3months

  • Periodontal width of keratinized tissue

    From baseline to 3months

  • Periodontal width of attached tissue

    From baseline to 3months

  • Practitioner-assessed treatment outcomes

    From baseline to 3months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Orthodontic Molar Protraction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Molar protraction using orthodontic tooth movement alone

Procedure: Orthodontic Molar Protraction

Orthodontic Molar Protraction and PAOO

EXPERIMENTAL

Molar protraction using orthodontic tooth movement and adjunctive Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO)

Procedure: Orthodontic Molar Protraction and PAOO

Interventions

Molar Protraction with Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Adjunctive Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Surgery was performed on all study sites in this arm in coordination with standard orthodontic molar protraction using traditional bands/brackets and orthodontic wires.

Orthodontic Molar Protraction and PAOO

Standard orthodontic molar protraction using traditional bands/brackets and orthodontic wires.

Orthodontic Molar Protraction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English speaking
  • At least 18 years old
  • Must be a patient of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Dental School
  • Able to read and understand informed consent document
  • One or more nonadjacent 1st or 2nd molar teeth that require protraction of ≥ 5 mm in patients undergoing orthodontic tooth movement
  • Presence of periodontally healthy, non-carious neighboring teeth, healthy implants or edentulous ridges on either side of the involved site(s)
  • No anticipated need for restorative care at the teeth to be treated during the study period.

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Less than 18 years old
  • Smokers/tobacco users (\>10 cigarettes/day)
  • Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing
  • Presence of active periodontal disease, caries, and/or periapical pathology at teeth to be moved orthodontically
  • Previous orthodontic therapy involving molar protraction of teeth to be treated
  • Previous periodontal surgery at site(s) to be treated

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Maria L Geisinger, DDS,MS

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Maria L. Geisinger, DDS,MS

CONTACT

Sarah Startley

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2018

First Posted

January 7, 2019

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03