Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Screening Mode Tool
EVIDENT
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to characterize the clinical performance of Abbott's Clinician Programmer Electrode Screening Mode tool (InformityTM tool) in programming InfinityTM deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 31, 2022
CompletedMarch 31, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.5 years
December 18, 2018
December 6, 2021
March 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Change in Therapeutic Window Size With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
Therapeutic window was defined as the electrical current at which the side effect appeared minus the electrical current at which complete therapeutic benefit was obtained. The reported value is the range of current between first side effect appearance and complete therapeutic benefit. The 'Selected contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the therapeutic window for the contact configuration that showed the widest therapeutic window during Informity testing.
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Selected Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Change in Therapeutic Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) With Best Contact at the Informity Programming Visit Compared to Baseline
TEED measures the total energy delivered by the deep brain stimulation system, and is represented as delivery over a set, arbitrary period of time. TEED is determined by the programmed stimulation parameters and measured system impedance. The 'Selected contact' is the contact configuration selected for the patient's programming. The 'best contact' is the contact configuration with the lowest TEED during Informity testing.
At Day 21 compared to baseline
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 3 Months
At 3 months compared to baseline
Motor Symptom Evaluation for ET Subjects- Change in Fahn Tolosa Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) Scores at 6 Months
At 6 months compared to baseline
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at Baseline
At baseline
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 3 Months
At 3 months
Mean Quality of Life for Essential Tremor Subjects as Measured by the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) at 6 Months
At 6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Single Arm
EXPERIMENTALClinician programmer electrode screening mode tool
Interventions
Provides a standardized workflow to guide clinicians or trained healthcare providers through the deep brain stimulation monopolar review screening process
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parkinson's disease patients:
- Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure.
- Patient is 18 to 80 years of age.
- Patient is diagnosed with Parkinson's disease for at least 4 years according to standard practice.
- Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-Parkinson's disease medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study.
- Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) within the last 12 months.
- Patient has had stable deep brain stimulation programming settings for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
- Essential tremor patients:
- Patient must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study related procedure.
- Patient is 18 to 80 years of age.
- Patient is diagnosed with essential tremor for at least 4 years according to standard practice.
- Patient is willing to maintain a constant dose of anti-tremor medication indicated as best medical management for at least 1 month prior to study enrollment.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule for the length of the study.
- Patient has been implanted with an 8-channel directional Infinity deep brain stimulation system in the ventral intermediate (Vim) thalamus within the last 12 months.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals unable to make the decision to participate in a clinical investigation on their own.
- Patient is currently programmed with segmented electrodes, and cannot tolerate omnidirectional programming.
- Patient is being evaluated for a lead revision.
- Patient has untreated clinically significant depression.
- Patient has dementia that interferes with their ability to co-operate or comply with study requirements or comprehend the informed consent, as determined by the investigator.
- Patient abuses drugs or alcohol.
- Patient is currently enrolled or plans to enroll in another concurrent study that may confound the results of this clinical investigation.
- Patient has a confirmation of diagnosis of a terminal illness associated with survival \<12 months.
- Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the patient's ability to participate in the clinical study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical study results.
- Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy during the clinical study follow-up period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
The University of Texas Health Science at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Inland Northwest Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Subjects enrolled at the experienced centers in this study already had individually tailored therapy at the baseline visit.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Binith Cheeran
- Organization
- Abbott Medical Devices Neuromodulation
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bradley White
Abbott
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Binith Cheeran
Abbott Medical Devices Neuromodulation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Outcomes assessor will be masked to subjects' deep brain stimulation programming.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2018
First Posted
January 7, 2019
Study Start
June 26, 2019
Primary Completion
December 16, 2020
Study Completion
December 16, 2020
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Results First Posted
March 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share