Comparison of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection and ESWT in Patients With CTS
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of ESWT (extracorporeal shock wave therapy) and local corticosteroid injection in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome(CTS) compared to participants receiving only splint and exercise therapy. And the investigators wanted to show that ESWT, a noninvasive treatment modality, is as effective and reliable as local corticosteroid injection, which is the least invasive treatment. Mild and moderate CTS patients will be determined according to American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM) criteria. 90 idiopathic moderate and mild CTS patients will be included in the study. The participants will be informed about their participation in a study and written informed consent will be obtained.The demographic characteristics and disease duration of the participants will be recorded.The participants will be randomly divided into 3 groups.40 mg of local methylprednisolone (depomedrol) injection will be applied to Group 1 once. And group 1 will also be given a hand wrist rest splint to use for 3 months, especially at night, when not using the hand. ESWT will be applied to Group 2 once a week for a total of 3 weeks and hand wrist rest splints will be given for 3 months especially at night when it is not in use. Group 3 (control group) will be given a hand wrist rest splint to use for 3 months, especially at night, when not using the hand. The evaluations will be repeated before treatment, after the first week after treatment (first ESWT application) and at the 3rd month. Hand grip strength measurement will be performed using Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire, visual analog scale and dynamometer. Electromyogram (EMG) data will be recorded before and 3 months after treatment. During the trial, the routine will not be excluded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 29, 2019
CompletedApril 28, 2020
April 1, 2020
3 months
December 7, 2018
April 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain
VAS is used to digitize some values that cannot be measured numerically.Two ends of the parameter to be evaluated are written on both ends of a 100 mm line.The participant is asked to mark the point indicating his/her status on this line.The patient marks his current state on this line.The length of the distance from where the pain is no longer to the point marked by the patient indicates the pain of the patient.The values obtained before and after treatment will be compared.The starting point of the graph is zero and the end point is 10.The distance of the point marked by the participant is measured in millimeters.And divided into 10.This value gives the participant's pain score.For example, if the point marked by the participant is 50 mm, it will get 50/10 = 5 points.Increasing the score of the participant means that the complaint is too high and the result is bad. The scale has no subscales and total score.
3. months after treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Numbness
VAS is used to digitize some values that cannot be measured numerically.Two ends of the parameter to be evaluated are written on both ends of a 100 mm line. The participant is asked to mark the point indicating his / her status on this line. The patient marks his current state on this line. The length of the distance from where the numbness is no longer to the point marked by the patient indicates the numbness of the patient. The values obtained before and after treatment will be compared.The starting point of the graph is zero and the end point is 10. The distance of the point marked by the participant is measured in millimeters. And divided into 10. This value gives the participant's numbness score.For example, if the point marked by the participant is 50 mm, it will get 50/10 = 5 points.Increasing the score of the participant means that the complaint is too high and the result is bad.The scale has no subscales and total score.
3. months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (8)
hand clamping force
3. months after treatment
boston scale
3. months after treatment
Median nerve sensory distal latency(electrophysiological examination,physiological parameter)
3. months after treatment
Median nerve sensory transmission rate( electrophysiological examination, physiological parameter)
3. months after treatment
Median nerve motor distal latency( electrophysiological examination, physiological parameter)
3. months after treatment
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
extracorporeal shock wave therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORESWT will be applied to Group 1 once a week for a total of 3 weeks. Modus ESWT device will be used. The patient's wrist will be applied at a pressure of 4 bar and 2000 Hz at a frequency of 5 Hz. Patients will be given a carpal tunnel wrist brace at night and when they do not use their hands during the day. Participants will use the carpal tunnel wrist brace 3 months.
local injection
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 mg of local Depomedrol (methylprednisolone) injection will be applied to group 2 once. Injection will be made from wrist with carpal tunnel syndrome.Patients will be given a splint at night and when they do not use their hands during the day. Participants will use the carpal tunnel wrist brace 3 months.
carpal tunnel wrist brace
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will be given a carpal tunnel wrist brace at night and when they do not use their hands during the day. Participants will use the carpal tunnel wrist brace 3 months.
Interventions
In addition to the local injection, carpal tunnel brace will be given.
In addition to all ESWT participants, carpal tunnel brace will be given.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women and male patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, tendinitis, tenosynovitis diagnosed between 18-65 years of age with clinical and EMG.
- Patients who are able to understand and correctly understand the patient information form
- Patients consenting to participate in the study according to the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Polyneuropathy
- Brachial plexopathy
- Systemic corticosteroid treatment
- Fracture and trauma history of the treated side anterior arm and wrist
- Inflammatory rheumatic disease
- Pregnant and lactating patients
- Patients with cardiac pacemakers
- Patients undergoing carpal tunnel syndrome surgery
- Thoracic outlet syndrome
- Severe atrophy
- Severe carpal tunnel syndrome
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to participate for any reason, and those who have been decided by the clinician that the patient is not in favor of the patient,
- Systemic diseases such as renal failure, peptic ulcer, dm, hypothyroidism, coagulation disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ahi Evran University Education and Research Hospital
Kırşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Ozturk Durmaz H, Tuncay F, Durmaz H, Erdem HR. Comparison of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Local Corticosteroid Injection Effectiveness in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7):685-692. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001891. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
PMID: 35706121DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Havva ÖZTÜRK DURMAZ
Ahi Evran University Education and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant Doctor Havva ÖZTÜRK DURMAZ
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2018
First Posted
January 4, 2019
Study Start
January 20, 2019
Primary Completion
April 29, 2019
Study Completion
May 29, 2019
Last Updated
April 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share