Regional Blocks of Gynecological Surgeries
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique for Adequate Anesthesia During Vaginal Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
273
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted on 273 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for elective vaginal surgeries such as vaginal hysterectomy, repair of prolapse Patients will be divided into three equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=91), group B for dural puncture epidural with 27G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=91) and group C for dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle(n=91). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2021
CompletedSeptember 1, 2021
August 1, 2021
2.4 years
December 23, 2018
August 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of bilateral sacral blockade
Sensory blockade was evaluated using a non-traumatic pinprick stimulus starting at the S2 dermatome and moving in a caudad direction (measured every 2 minutes)
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Onset of sensory blockade
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Maximum achieved sensory level
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Time to achieve the maximum sensory level
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Onset of motor blockade
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Time to complete motor block
Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Conventional Epidural Technique
EXPERIMENTALProcedure: Standard Lumbar Epidural Block using Touhy Epidural Needle (18G) at L4-5 inter-space and Epidural Catheter (20G) was inserted then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure: 25G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 27G Whitacre needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORProcedure: 27G Dural Puncture Epidural Block at L4-5 inter-space then bupivacaine 0.5% 15-20 ml with 50ug fentanyl was given.
Interventions
Standard Lumbar Epidural Technique at L4-5 inter-space using 0.5%Bupivacaine and Fentanyl.
25G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique at L4-5 inter-space using 0.5%Bupivacaine and Fentanyl.
27G Dural Puncture Epidural Technique at L4-5 inter-space using 0.5%Bupivacaine and Fentanyl.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I and II
- Height(150-170 cm)
You may not qualify if:
- patient refusal
- hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs
- bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
Department of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU, and Pain Management
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
Reham Ali Abdelrahman
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Reham Ali Abdelrahman, M.D.
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2018
First Posted
January 2, 2019
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 28, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2021
Last Updated
September 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08