Pain Assessment During Mandibular Nerve Block Injection With the Aid of Dental Vibe Tool in Pediatric Dental Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to valuate the effectiveness of DentalVibe(DV) tool in pain reduction during local anesthetic injection compared to traditional injection without aid of DentalVibe in pediatric patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2019
CompletedApril 10, 2020
April 1, 2020
3 months
December 28, 2018
April 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subjective pain reduction during local anesthesia administration.
Pain will be assessed during local anesthesia injection by means of Wong-Baker faces scale. It consists of faces with different facial expression for happiness and pain and is scored from 0-5 as 0 is very happy and feels no pain and 5 is very painful
during administration of local anesthesia
Objective pain assessment after local anesthesia administration
After performing all the injections, pain reaction will be evaluated by two investigators independently using recorded video tapes by Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC). The scale comprises the following parameters: (1) Face, (2) Legs, (3) Activity, (4) Cry, and (5) Consolability. Each of the five categories is scored from 0 to 2, which results in a minimum score of 0 and maximum of 10. According to this scale 0 = relaxed and comfortable (no pain), 1-3 = mild discomfort, 4-6 = moderate pain, and 7-10 = severe discomfort or pain, A lower score represents less physical reaction than does a higher number.
after performing all injections
Study Arms (2)
Injection with the aid of DentalVibe
EXPERIMENTAL1 mL of Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle. DentalVibe is a small, handheld cordless device that has a charging docking station. A demonstration of DentalVibe (DV) will be performed by putting it into direct contact with the children's nails before applying the device intraorally. Then, the device will be placed on the oral mucosa to enclose the injection site before administering local anesthesia and Potential subject-expectancy effects and pressure from the placement of DV will be controlled. The device will be turned on to stimulate the area of needle penetration. After 5 seconds of vibration, the needle will be inserted. The device will continue vibrating during needle insertion and anesthetic injection.
Injection with topical benzocaine 20%
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical anesthesia -Benzocaine gel 20%. Tissues will be dried using (2 X 2) gauze to enhance the absorption of the benzocaine gel 20% around the site of the needle penetration and will be left in contact with the soft tissue for one minute. Then the local anesthetic solution (1 ml Mepivacaine HCl 2%, 1/20000 Levonordefrin) will be injected using a 27 gauge dental needle.
Interventions
It is a vibrotactile device that aids in reducing pain during local anesthesia injection in pediatric patients
Topical benzocaine 20% gel on the mucosal injection site prior to injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range from 5-7 years.
- Patients who are in need of pulpotomy dental treatment requiring bilateral local anesthesia in the mandible.
- Children free of any systemic disease or special health care needs.
- Positive or definitely positive behavior during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection that could affect anesthetic assessment.
- Signs of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
- Radiographs show periapical or bifurcation radiolucency.
- Patients allergic to local anesthesia or having a family history of allergy to local anesthesia.
- Patients with acute oral or facial infection (swelling and/or cellulitis).
- Patients refusing to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nourhan M.Alylead
- Alexandria Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Sermet Elbay U, Elbay M, Yildirim S, Kaya E, Kaya C, Ugurluel C, BaydemIr C. Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;26(5):336-45. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12204. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PMID: 26369274BACKGROUNDHutchins HS Jr, Young FA, Lackland DT, Fishburne CP. The effectiveness of topical anesthesia and vibration in alleviating the pain of oral injections. Anesth Prog. 1997 Summer;44(3):87-9.
PMID: 9481967BACKGROUNDRam D, Peretz B. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):130-3.
PMID: 14528773BACKGROUNDNanitsos E, Vartuli R, Forte A, Dennison PJ, Peck CC. The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x.
PMID: 19473149BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Passant H Hassanein, BDS
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amani M Khalil, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dalia AM Talaat, PhD
Alexandria University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The operator will not be blinded to the type of treatment. However, the statistician will be blinded to the treatment groups.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2018
First Posted
December 31, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 10, 2019
Study Completion
May 15, 2019
Last Updated
April 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04