The Superiority of Contralateral Oblique View for Mid-thoracic Epidural Assess
Comparison of Contralateral Oblique View With the Lateral View for Mid-thoracic Epidural Assess: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to compare contralateral oblique view with the lateral view for fluoroscopic guided mid-thoracic epidural assess.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 7, 2019
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
9 months
December 27, 2018
November 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Distance between the tip of epidural needle and the baseline (CLO view - ventral interlaminar line, lateral view - spinolaminar line) at each view (CLO view at 40 degrees, 50 degrees, 60 degrees, CLO measured view, and lateral view)
Location of the needle tip was defined as being significantly before the baseline (-2), just before the baseline (-1), on the baseline (0), just after the baseline (+1), or significantly after the baseline (+2).
One day after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The quality of needle tip visualization at each view (CLO view at 40 degrees, 50 degrees, 60 degrees, CLO measured view, and lateral view)
One day after the procedure
Study Arms (1)
Fluoroscopic-guided TEB
EXPERIMENTALAfter assessment of the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique with air under fluoroscopic guidance, six fluoroscopic views will be obtained: true anteroposterior, contralateral oblique (CLO) at 40 degrees, 50 degrees, 60 degrees, CLO measured, and lateral for comparison CLO view with lateral view.
Interventions
When performing a fluoroscopic-guided thoracic epidural block (TEB), an 18-gauge Tuohy needle will be used for interlaminar epidural access. If the epidural space was accessed under fluoroscopic guidance and using the loss of resistance technique with air. All procedures will be performed with a paramedian approach under the true AP and lateral view at first, If the interlaminar space is not visible, the CLO view will be used. If the needle is deemed to be in the epidural space when the loss occurred, six fluoroscopic views will be obtained: true AP, CLO at 40 degrees, 50 degrees, 60 degrees, CLO measured, and lateral. The CLO measured angle will be determined by measuring the angle between the superior lamina and spinous process on the midsagittal plane on thoracic MRI or CT.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled for mid thoracic (T4-T8) epidural block or catheter insertion
- ≤ age \<80
- Presence of thoracic MRI or CT
- When obtaining informed consent voluntarily
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to local anesthetics and contrast dye, and steroid
- Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet medication, coagulopathy
- Infection at the insertion site
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Prior spine instrumentation
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Asan medical center
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Seong-Soo Choi
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Kim DH, Yoon SH, Lee J, Park H, Sim JH, Choi SS. Evaluation of Contralateral Oblique and Lateral Views for Mid-Thoracic Epidural Access: A Prospective Observational Study. Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E51-E59.
PMID: 33400438DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seong-Soo Choi, MD, PhD
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2018
First Posted
December 31, 2018
Study Start
February 22, 2019
Primary Completion
November 7, 2019
Study Completion
November 7, 2019
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11