Assisted Rehabilitation Care During Post-stroke mANaGement: fEasibiLity Assessment
ARCANGEL
1 other identifier
observational
41
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The ARCANGEL study evaluates the feasibility of introducing ARC (Assisted Rehabilitation Care), a new device for home-based post-stroke rehabilitation in the current clinical practise. All the stroke survivors included in the study will received their own equipment to be used at home for 6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2018
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 12, 2020
CompletedJune 16, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.6 years
December 13, 2018
June 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Number of patients successfully completing the study
Number of patients completing the 6-month observation period
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Ratio between the total number of subjects refusing to participate before training and the total number of subjects screened
Ratio between the total number of patients refusing to participate BEFORE starting trainings and the number of patients screened, as calculated by means of the Screening and Enrollment Log to be completed by each Site, the baseline baseline assessment (reporting a number of training sessions performed, which should be EQUAL TO 0), and the end of study visit.
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Ratio between the total number of subjects refusing to participate after training and the total number of subjects screened
Ratio between the total number of patients refusing to participate AFTER training and the total number of patients screened, as calculated by means of the Screening and Enrollment Log to be completed by each Site, the baseline baseline assessment (reporting a number of training sessions performed, which should be at least EQUAL TO 1), and the end of study visit.
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Number of training sessions
Average number of training sessions needed for a patient to be able to use ARC at home
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Overall training period duration
Average time (days) needed to complete training sessions
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Assisted Rehabilitation Care (ARC) questionnaire score
Average score from the ARC questionnaire, specifically designed to assess the following sub-scales: Use of Technology, ARC Usability, Wearability and Global Satisfaction For each dimension, a subscore is calculated as the sum of the value associated to each possible answer (one single answer is allowed for each question), from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Finally, the total score is calculated as sum of sub-scores.
6-month assessment
Assisted Rehabilitation Care (ARC) questionnaire change
Change at 6 months of ARC questionnaire score. The change is calculated as difference between the average total score calculated at 6 months and the average total score calculated at 3 months. (Score calculation method ref. Outcome 6)
Evaluations at 3 and 6 months
ARC global satisfaction score
Global score on the ARC user satisfaction ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high).
6-month assessment
Modified version of Adult Carer Quality of Life Questionnaire (AC-QoL) total score
In order to score the AC-QoL use the following scoring framework. Some of the questionnaire items are negatively worded (Value from 0 to 3, Never = 0 - Always = 3) and some are positively worded (Value from 0 to 3, Never = 3 - Always = 0). To calculate the total score, a calculation algorithm adds up each row for the score for each sub-scale, and add all the scores for the sub-scales to calculate the overall quality of life score.
6-month evaluation
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Device-related adverse effects
Through study completion, an average of 15 months
Modified Rankin Score change (N.Ireland)
Change at 6-month from baseline
Barthel Index change (Italy)
Baseline assessment and 6-month visit
Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire summary index
6-month evaluation
Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire summary index change
Baseline assessment and 6-month visit
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
ARC - Assisted Rehabilitation Care
All study participants will be asked to use ARC during for their post-stroke home based rehabilitation for up to 6 months.
Interventions
ARC is a platform based on wearable inertial sensors and machine learning algorithms, designed to bring the rehabilitation at post-stroke patients' home, following hospital discharge. The product has been created with the purpose to improve physical skills and patient independence accordingly, in the six months following the acute event. ARC aims to optimize, ease and make more accessible the path of post-stroke rehabilitation during post-acute phase, in real life settings.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients diagnosed with stroke among those admitted to the acute and community hospitals among the Northern Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland, and to Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Turin (Italy) will be considered eligible for this study. Patients will be recruited during their hospital stay, or after hospital discharge, proven they have had a stroke in the previous 6 months. Among these, only patients who have given their informed consent to participate in the study and who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be considered eligible.
You may qualify if:
- Stroke Diagnosis, with a stable clinical condition
- Age \> 18
- Modified Rankin score lower or equal to 4 or Barthel Index score greater than 10 at the time of enrollment
- Patients must be able to keep the standing position without or with minimum assistance
- Patient giving written consent and engage
You may not qualify if:
- Significant cognitive impairment and behavioral disorders - judged by a responsible clinician
- Poor communication or reading skills - judged by a Speech and Language Therapist
- Orthopedic limitation (fractures, amputations, advance osteoarthritis, active rheumatoid arthritis)
- Head trauma
- Epilepsy, not pharmacologically controlled
- Severe spatial neglect
- Neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases
- Severe spasticity
- Patient not giving written consent and not engage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Camlin Ltdlead
- Northern Health and Social Care Trustcollaborator
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Torinocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Torino
Pinerolo, 10064, Italy
Northern Health and Social Care Trust
Antrim, Northern Ireland, BT412RL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (14)
Krueger H, Koot J, Hall RE, O'Callaghan C, Bayley M, Corbett D. Prevalence of Individuals Experiencing the Effects of Stroke in Canada: Trends and Projections. Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2226-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009616.
PMID: 26205371BACKGROUNDDuncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):e100-43. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF. No abstract available.
PMID: 16120836BACKGROUNDHankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1034-40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000012515.66889.24.
PMID: 11935057BACKGROUNDHackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke : results from the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000 Feb;31(2):440-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.440.
PMID: 10657420BACKGROUNDDobkin BH, Dorsch A. New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013 Jun;15(6):331. doi: 10.1007/s11883-013-0331-y.
PMID: 23591673BACKGROUNDNoorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Oct 9;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-144.
PMID: 25297823BACKGROUNDUswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1498-501. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010.
PMID: 16003690BACKGROUNDWong WY, Wong MS, Lo KH. Clinical applications of sensors for human posture and movement analysis: a review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Mar;31(1):62-75. doi: 10.1080/03093640600983949.
PMID: 17365886BACKGROUNDZhou H, Hu H, Harris N. Application of wearable inertial sensors in stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;2005:6825-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616072.
PMID: 17281841BACKGROUNDLara González-Villanueva et al., A Tool for Linguistic Assessment of Rehabilitation Exercises. Applied Soft Computing, Special issue on hybrid intelligent methods for health technologies 14(Part A): 120-31, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.07.010.
BACKGROUNDMannini A, Sabatini AM. Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(2):1154-75. doi: 10.3390/s100201154. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
PMID: 22205862BACKGROUNDParkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jan;10(1):119-28. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.856863.
PMID: 16445257BACKGROUNDLara OD, Labrador MA. A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorial 15(3), 2013.
BACKGROUNDGarcia-Ceja E, Brena RF, Carrasco-Jimenez JC, Garrido L. Long-term activity recognition from wristwatch accelerometer data. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Nov 27;14(12):22500-24. doi: 10.3390/s141222500.
PMID: 25436652BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Frances Johnston, MSc
Northern Health and Social Care Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2018
First Posted
December 26, 2018
Study Start
November 23, 2018
Primary Completion
June 12, 2020
Study Completion
June 12, 2020
Last Updated
June 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06