NCT03787433

Brief Summary

The ARCANGEL study evaluates the feasibility of introducing ARC (Assisted Rehabilitation Care), a new device for home-based post-stroke rehabilitation in the current clinical practise. All the stroke survivors included in the study will received their own equipment to be used at home for 6 months.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 23, 2018

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 12, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 12, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 16, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 15, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

RehabilitationAccelerometersWearable sensorsArtificial IntelligenceStrokeHome-based RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingPost-stroke rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of patients successfully completing the study

    Number of patients completing the 6-month observation period

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Ratio between the total number of subjects refusing to participate before training and the total number of subjects screened

    Ratio between the total number of patients refusing to participate BEFORE starting trainings and the number of patients screened, as calculated by means of the Screening and Enrollment Log to be completed by each Site, the baseline baseline assessment (reporting a number of training sessions performed, which should be EQUAL TO 0), and the end of study visit.

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Ratio between the total number of subjects refusing to participate after training and the total number of subjects screened

    Ratio between the total number of patients refusing to participate AFTER training and the total number of patients screened, as calculated by means of the Screening and Enrollment Log to be completed by each Site, the baseline baseline assessment (reporting a number of training sessions performed, which should be at least EQUAL TO 1), and the end of study visit.

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Number of training sessions

    Average number of training sessions needed for a patient to be able to use ARC at home

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Overall training period duration

    Average time (days) needed to complete training sessions

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Assisted Rehabilitation Care (ARC) questionnaire score

    Average score from the ARC questionnaire, specifically designed to assess the following sub-scales: Use of Technology, ARC Usability, Wearability and Global Satisfaction For each dimension, a subscore is calculated as the sum of the value associated to each possible answer (one single answer is allowed for each question), from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Finally, the total score is calculated as sum of sub-scores.

    6-month assessment

  • Assisted Rehabilitation Care (ARC) questionnaire change

    Change at 6 months of ARC questionnaire score. The change is calculated as difference between the average total score calculated at 6 months and the average total score calculated at 3 months. (Score calculation method ref. Outcome 6)

    Evaluations at 3 and 6 months

  • ARC global satisfaction score

    Global score on the ARC user satisfaction ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high).

    6-month assessment

  • Modified version of Adult Carer Quality of Life Questionnaire (AC-QoL) total score

    In order to score the AC-QoL use the following scoring framework. Some of the questionnaire items are negatively worded (Value from 0 to 3, Never = 0 - Always = 3) and some are positively worded (Value from 0 to 3, Never = 3 - Always = 0). To calculate the total score, a calculation algorithm adds up each row for the score for each sub-scale, and add all the scores for the sub-scales to calculate the overall quality of life score.

    6-month evaluation

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Device-related adverse effects

    Through study completion, an average of 15 months

  • Modified Rankin Score change (N.Ireland)

    Change at 6-month from baseline

  • Barthel Index change (Italy)

    Baseline assessment and 6-month visit

  • Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire summary index

    6-month evaluation

  • Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire summary index change

    Baseline assessment and 6-month visit

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

ARC - Assisted Rehabilitation Care

All study participants will be asked to use ARC during for their post-stroke home based rehabilitation for up to 6 months.

Device: ARC - Assisted Rehabilitation Care

Interventions

ARC is a platform based on wearable inertial sensors and machine learning algorithms, designed to bring the rehabilitation at post-stroke patients' home, following hospital discharge. The product has been created with the purpose to improve physical skills and patient independence accordingly, in the six months following the acute event. ARC aims to optimize, ease and make more accessible the path of post-stroke rehabilitation during post-acute phase, in real life settings.

ARC - Assisted Rehabilitation Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients diagnosed with stroke among those admitted to the acute and community hospitals among the Northern Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland, and to Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Turin (Italy) will be considered eligible for this study. Patients will be recruited during their hospital stay, or after hospital discharge, proven they have had a stroke in the previous 6 months. Among these, only patients who have given their informed consent to participate in the study and who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be considered eligible.

You may qualify if:

  • Stroke Diagnosis, with a stable clinical condition
  • Age \> 18
  • Modified Rankin score lower or equal to 4 or Barthel Index score greater than 10 at the time of enrollment
  • Patients must be able to keep the standing position without or with minimum assistance
  • Patient giving written consent and engage

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant cognitive impairment and behavioral disorders - judged by a responsible clinician
  • Poor communication or reading skills - judged by a Speech and Language Therapist
  • Orthopedic limitation (fractures, amputations, advance osteoarthritis, active rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Head trauma
  • Epilepsy, not pharmacologically controlled
  • Severe spatial neglect
  • Neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases
  • Severe spasticity
  • Patient not giving written consent and not engage

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Torino

Pinerolo, 10064, Italy

Location

Northern Health and Social Care Trust

Antrim, Northern Ireland, BT412RL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Krueger H, Koot J, Hall RE, O'Callaghan C, Bayley M, Corbett D. Prevalence of Individuals Experiencing the Effects of Stroke in Canada: Trends and Projections. Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2226-31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009616.

    PMID: 26205371BACKGROUND
  • Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D. Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):e100-43. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16120836BACKGROUND
  • Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Anderson CS. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1034-40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000012515.66889.24.

    PMID: 11935057BACKGROUND
  • Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke : results from the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000 Feb;31(2):440-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.440.

    PMID: 10657420BACKGROUND
  • Dobkin BH, Dorsch A. New evidence for therapies in stroke rehabilitation. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013 Jun;15(6):331. doi: 10.1007/s11883-013-0331-y.

    PMID: 23591673BACKGROUND
  • Noorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Oct 9;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-144.

    PMID: 25297823BACKGROUND
  • Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1498-501. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010.

    PMID: 16003690BACKGROUND
  • Wong WY, Wong MS, Lo KH. Clinical applications of sensors for human posture and movement analysis: a review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Mar;31(1):62-75. doi: 10.1080/03093640600983949.

    PMID: 17365886BACKGROUND
  • Zhou H, Hu H, Harris N. Application of wearable inertial sensors in stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2005;2005:6825-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616072.

    PMID: 17281841BACKGROUND
  • Lara González-Villanueva et al., A Tool for Linguistic Assessment of Rehabilitation Exercises. Applied Soft Computing, Special issue on hybrid intelligent methods for health technologies 14(Part A): 120-31, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.07.010.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mannini A, Sabatini AM. Machine learning methods for classifying human physical activity from on-body accelerometers. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(2):1154-75. doi: 10.3390/s100201154. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

    PMID: 22205862BACKGROUND
  • Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, Mantyjarvi J, Peltola J, Korhonen I. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006 Jan;10(1):119-28. doi: 10.1109/titb.2005.856863.

    PMID: 16445257BACKGROUND
  • Lara OD, Labrador MA. A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorial 15(3), 2013.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Ceja E, Brena RF, Carrasco-Jimenez JC, Garrido L. Long-term activity recognition from wristwatch accelerometer data. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Nov 27;14(12):22500-24. doi: 10.3390/s141222500.

    PMID: 25436652BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Frances Johnston, MSc

    Northern Health and Social Care Trust

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2018

First Posted

December 26, 2018

Study Start

November 23, 2018

Primary Completion

June 12, 2020

Study Completion

June 12, 2020

Last Updated

June 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Locations