Use of Whole Body Vibration in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Therapeutic Intervention Consisting of the Use of Whole Body Vibration in Patients With Fibromyalgia.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month program consisted of the use of whole body vibration (WBV) in patients with fibromyalgia in order to determine whether this intervention would be effective to short and medium-term improvement of symptoms in these patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 29, 2020
CompletedFebruary 13, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 months
December 16, 2018
October 11, 2019
January 29, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Pressure Pain Thresholds
Pressure stimuli were applied on two bilateral body locations: epicondyles and index finger. The pressure pain threshold was defined as the pressure value considered as painful by the participant.
20 minutes
Vibration Thresholds
Vibration thresholds at the great toes and at the index fingers were quantified bilaterally using a Vibratron II (Physitemp, Clifton, USA). Using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure, subjects identified which of two rods was vibrating. Vibration values displayed on the control unit are vibration units (the amplitude of vibration, proportional to the square of applied voltage). Vibration threshold for the index finger in the normal population between 18 and 65 years of age is 0.7 vibration units with a standard deviation of 0.4 vibration units. The vibration threshold for the great toe in a similar population is 1.2 vibration units with a standard deviation of 0.5 vibration units. There is an increase in threshold scores and in variance as a function of age. There is an increase in threshold scores and variance depending on age. When the vibratory threshold is lower, it indicates the patient's greater ability to detect vibratory stimuli.
20 minutes
Berg Scale
This is a functional balance assessment tool, consisting of 14 functional tasks with values ranging from 0 (cannot perform) to 4 (normal performance). The general scores range from 0 (severely impaired balance) to 56 (excellent balance). The Berg scale has been previously used in patients with fibromyalgia to assess balance.
30 minutes
Six-minute Walking Test (6MWT)
The 6MWT is a functional test in which the patient walks what he can during 6 minutes, analyzing the total distance walked.
6 minutes
Dynamometer
A back muscle dynamometer was used to measure isometric back muscle strength.
5 minutes
Analysis of the Romberg's Balance Test With the CvMob Software
The CvMob is an Open Source tool for the movement analysis. The software is capable to analyse the trajectories and to determinate the kinematic variables from a movie, that can be done with a simple camera. The tool includes the Movement Elements Decomposition Method (MED).In the present study, we analyzed the oscillatory body movements during the test performance. These ocillatory movements should be minimal with good balance.The patients were asked to remain in orthostatic position with feet parallel at shoulder height, arms extended along the body and eyes closed for 1 minute. A body marker is placed on the patient's head. A camera placed on the ceiling records the movements. Subsequently, the software analyzes and decomposes the movement that the patient has described in the anteroposterior and mediolateral axis. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
1 minute
Gait Task
Subjects were instructed to walk on a 4 meters carpet at their normal walking step, with shocks and with flexed arms positioned on the abdomen. Optical markers were attached at the following three body positions: area between the lateral condyle of the femur and the fibular head, great trochanter and lateral malleolus. Subject's motion was digitally recorded with a video camera at 210 frames per second (CasioExilimEX-FS10). The camera was positioned at a distance of 4 meters from the carpet to visualize changes in position, velocity and anatomical points along the x-axis. It was calculated the stride length by an open- source software for computer vision analysis of human movement.
5 minutes
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) is an assessment and evaluation instrument developed to measure fibromyalgia (FM) patient status, progress and outcomes. It has been designed to measure the components of health status that are believed to be most affected by fibromyalgia. The FIQ is a self administered instrument that takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. The directions are simple and the scoring is self-explanatory. The FIQ is scored in such a way that a higher score indicates a greater impact of the syndrome on the person. Each of the 10 items has a maximum possible score of 10. Thus the maximum possible score is 100. The average FM patient scores about 50, severely afflicted patients are usually 70 plus.
5 minutes
Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)
Each participant was asked to indicate their current level of pain using a 20 cm VAS that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest level of pain).
5 minutes
Quality of Life Index (QLI)
The Quality of Life Index (QLI) is a self-report questionnaire that measures perceived health-related quality of life. We used the total score of QLI. Its scale is scored by simply adding the score on each item. The range of scores is between 15 to 105, with a higher score or number being indicative of a higher quality of life. An average total rating for a healthy person is usually around 90, whereas a low quality of life measures around 15.
10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Whole body vibration plat
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn arm type in which a group of patients with fibromyalgia receives an intervention based on the use of a whole body vibration platform, considered to be effective by clinical evidence.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention arm
Interventions
A neuromuscular treatment using a rotational whole body vibration platform.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with FM were included in the study if they fulfilled the 1990 classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for fibromyalgia.
- Pain-free volunteers were included if they did not present pain symptoms or some type of treatment in any part of the body during the previous 12 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants were excluded from the study if they had not signed the informed consent or if they reported any other musculoskeletal disorder rather than patients with FM, any neurological disorder or had previous spinal fusion surgery or spinal cord stimulation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Balearic Islands
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07122, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Adsuar JC, Del Pozo-Cruz B, Parraca JA, Olivares PR, Gusi N. Whole body vibration improves the single-leg stance static balance in women with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Feb;52(1):85-91.
PMID: 22327091RESULTSanudo B, de Hoyo M, Carrasco L, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, McVeigh JG. Effect of whole-body vibration exercise on balance in women with fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Feb;18(2):158-64. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0881. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
PMID: 22321155RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- José Mingorance
- Organization
- University of Balearic Islands
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
José A Mingorance, PhD
Balearic Islands University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- In this clinical trial design strategy, the participants and the investigator do not know which participants have been assigned which interventions so there is a double-blind masking.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2018
First Posted
December 20, 2018
Study Start
January 7, 2019
Primary Completion
March 25, 2019
Study Completion
June 28, 2019
Last Updated
February 13, 2020
Results First Posted
January 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share