NCT03779373

Brief Summary

This study will compare a group of patients managed with a manual GDFT protocol (using the EV1000 monitoring device; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA) to a group of patients managed using a decision support system for GDFT guidance (implemented on the same EV1000 monitoring) in patients undergoing major abdominal and orthopedic surgery.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2018

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

December 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 10, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • composite criteria of minor postoperative complications

    This composite score includes 8 items : 1. postoperative nausea and vomiting 2. delirium and confusion 3. Infection of surgical site 4. urinary infection 5. acute kidney injury (KDIGO I \& II classiciation) 6. paralytic ileus 7. other infection (skin, catheter, unknown etc) 8. Readmission to the hospital within 30 days postoperative

    30 days postsurgery

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Percentage of Time spent during the procedure with a stroke volume variation < 13%

    Postoperative day 1

  • Percentage of Time spent during the procedure with a Cardiac index >2.5l/min/m2

    Postoperative day 1

  • composite criteria of major postoperative complications

    30 days postsurgery

  • cardiac index over the procedure

    Postoperative day 1

  • stroke volume over the procedure

    Postoperative day 1

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

EV1000 monitoring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group of patients will receive fluid administration during surgery based on a manual GDFT protocol actually in place in the department using the EV1000 monitoring device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA)

Other: Use of a decision support system on the EV1000 monitor (AFM mode)

EV1000 monioring with the decision (AFM)

EXPERIMENTAL

This group of patients will receive fluid administration during surgery based on a novel clinical decision support system for GDFT guidance using the EV1000 monitoring device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, USA)

Other: Use of a decision support system on the EV1000 monitor (AFM mode)

Interventions

The way to administer fluid is based on the same monitoring device but will differ by the way fluid is given ( following a manual GDFT protocol versus following recommendation from an active clinical deicsion support system for fluid administration called AFM (assisted fluid management)

EV1000 monioring with the decision (AFM)EV1000 monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All adult patients in the operating room scheduled for a major abdominal \& orthopedic surgery requiring a cardiac output monitoring (EV1000).
  • Written informed consent received before surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor Patients.
  • No french speaking.
  • Atrial fibrillation or severe arythmia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Joosten Alexandre

Paris, Kremlin Bicetre, 94270, France

Location

Study Officials

  • Jacques Duranteau, PhD

    Bicetre Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • APHP BICETRE

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2018

First Posted

December 19, 2018

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

July 30, 2020

Last Updated

May 14, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations