NCT03779204

Brief Summary

Compared to the vast amount of literature about the risk factors associated with young people entering and becoming entrenched in homelessness, much less is known about how to facilitate and sustain transitions off the streets. Current evidence indicates that while structural supports such as subsidized housing and social service providers are important, these things alone are insufficient to help young people integrate into mainstream society. Connecting these young people with an adult who exhibits the relationship-based components of mentoring that young people value most (e.g., genuine interest in their well-being and belief in their ability to succeed, a non-judgmental attitude and a willingness to listen, the provision of advice, guidance, affirmation and encouragement) may be key to helping them move forward and integrate into the mainstream. This intervention will provide 24 young people (ages 18-26) who have transitioned out of homelessness and into market rent housing within the past year with rent subsidies for 24 months. Half of the young people will be randomized to receive regular mentorship from an adult mentor, tasked with helping their mentee bridge the gap between homelessness and mainstream living. It is hypothesized that, for the primary outcome measures of community integration and self-esteem: 1\. Better mean scores (community integration and self-esteem) in the participants who receive rent subsidies plus mentorship (intervention group) will be observed compared to the participants who receive rent subsidies only (control group) by the primary endpoint of 18 months of study participation. It is hypothesized that, for the secondary outcome measures of social connectedness, hope, and academic and vocational participation:

  1. 1.Better mean scores (social connectedness and hope) in the intervention group relative to participants in the control group will be observed by 18 months of study participation.
  2. 2.Participants in the intervention group will be more likely than the control group to demonstrate sustained engagement in academic and vocational activities (education, employment, and/or skills training) by 18 months of study participation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2019

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2018

Results QC Date

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Social IsolationSelf-EsteemHopePsychiatric ProblemEducationEmploymentIncomeHousing ProblemsIdentity, SocialYouthRent SubsidyMentorship

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Community Integration Scale Score at 18 Months

    This outcome is a measure of behavioural (e.g., participation in activities) and psychological (e.g., sense of belonging) aspects of community integration. This will be measured using the Community Integration Scale (CIS), an 11-item scale. The CIS includes a psychological subscale (possible score range is from 4-20, 4 being low psychological community integration and 20 being high integration), and a physical subscale (total score range is 0-7, 0 being low physical community integration, and 7 being high integration). Only the psychological subscale has been reported here.

    Change from baseline to 18 months

  • Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score at 18 Months

    This outcome is a measure of global self-worth and will be measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, a 10-item scale, internal consistency α = .77 - .88. The total scoring range is 0-30, a score of \<15 is categorized as low self-esteem, and 15-30 is categorized as normal self-esteem.

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Social Connectedness Scale Score at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

  • Beck Hopelessness Scale Score at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

  • Academic/Vocational Participation as Assessed by a Questionnaire at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Modified Engulfment Scale Score at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

  • Modified Colorado Symptom Index Score at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

  • Income as Assessed by a Questionnaire at 18 Months

    Change from baseline to 18 months.

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Rent subsidies + Mentorship

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm (n = 13) will receive rent subsidies (ranging from $400 - $500/month) for 24 months as part of the intervention and be matched with an adult mentor recruited by one of the community partners.

Behavioral: MentorshipBehavioral: Rent Subsidies

Rent subsidies only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this arm (n = 11) will receive rent subsidies only (ranging from $400 - $500/month) for 24 months as part of the comparator group intervention. This group will not receive mentorship.

Behavioral: Rent Subsidies

Interventions

MentorshipBEHAVIORAL

The mentors will be encouraged to incorporate the key relationship-based components of natural mentors (e.g., a 'coach' or 'cheerleader' role) to assist with mainstream integration. The mentors will have more flexibility than a typical formal mentorship program in the types of activities they pursue with their mentees. They will not be mandated to attend shelter-based social events, but rather engage in activities that direct their mentees away from the shelter system (and their old identities as homeless youth) and toward the mainstream (e.g., meeting for coffee at a local university campus). All of the mentors will meet monthly with their mentees for two years. In addition, the mentor will be encouraged to touch base with their mentee via phone or text message every week. If a mentor is unable to continue their role and there are at least six months left in the study, the study participant will be matched with a new mentor.

Rent subsidies + Mentorship
Rent SubsidiesBEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive rent subsidies ($500 for those living in Toronto, $400 for those living in Hamilton or St. Catherine's due to differences in cost of living) for 24 months.

Rent subsidies + MentorshipRent subsidies only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 26 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Be between ages 18-26
  • Left homelessness within the past year
  • Living in market rent housing
  • Plan on staying in or nearby the community in which they were recruited (Toronto, Hamilton, or St. Catharines) for the duration of the 24-month study
  • Be willing to be matched with an adult mentor who has been screened and chosen by one of the community partners

You may not qualify if:

  • In imminent danger of losing their housing (e.g., facing jail time or impending eviction)
  • Enrolled in another study with enhanced financial and social supports
  • Unable to provide free and informed consent
  • Unable to communicate fluently in English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Related Publications (66)

  • Altena AM, Brilleslijper-Kater SN, Wolf JL. Effective interventions for homeless youth: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):637-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.017.

    PMID: 20494240BACKGROUND
  • Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Dec;42(6):861-5. doi: 10.1037/h0037562. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4436473BACKGROUND
  • Brueckner, M., Green, M., & Saggers, S. (2011). The trappings of home: Young homeless people's transitions towards independent living. Housing Studies, 26(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/02673037.2010.512751.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chenail. R. J., St. Goerge, S., Wulff, D., & Cooper, R. (2012). Action research: The methodologies. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (5th ed.) (pp. 455-470). Sudbury, MS: Jones & Bartlett.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ciarolo, J. A., Edwards, D. W., Kiresuk, T. J., Newman, F. L., & Brown, T. R. (1981). Colorado symptom index. Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.

    BACKGROUND
  • Coren E, Hossain R, Pardo Pardo J, Bakker B. Interventions for promoting reintegration and reducing harmful behaviour and lifestyles in street-connected children and young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 13;2016(1):CD009823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009823.pub3.

    PMID: 26760047BACKGROUND
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.

    PMID: 18824488BACKGROUND
  • Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    BACKGROUND
  • Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    BACKGROUND
  • Dang MT, Miller E. Characteristics of natural mentoring relationships from the perspectives of homeless youth. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Nov;26(4):246-53. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12038. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

    PMID: 24180604BACKGROUND
  • Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

    BACKGROUND
  • Eakin JM, Mykhalovskiy E. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 May;9(2):187-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x.

    PMID: 12787182BACKGROUND
  • Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2011 Dec;25(8):748-57. doi: 10.1177/0269216311417919. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

    PMID: 21807749BACKGROUND
  • Fletcher, R.H., Fletcher, S.W., & Fletcher, G.S. (2014). Clinical epidemiology: The essentials (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    BACKGROUND
  • Frederick, T., Chwalek, M., Hughes, J., Karabanow, J., & Kidd, S. (2014). How stable is stable? Defining and measuring housing stability. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(8), 964- 979. doi:10.1002/jcop.21665.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gaetz, S. (2014). Coming of age: Reimagining the response to youth homelessness in Canada. Toronto, ON: The Canadian Homelessness Research Network Press. Retrieved from http://www.homelesshub.ca/comingofage

    BACKGROUND
  • Gaetz, S., Dej, E., Richter, T., & Redman, M. (2016) The state of homelessness in Canada 2016. Toronto, ON: Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Press. Retrieved from http://www.homelesshub.ca/SOHC2016

    BACKGROUND
  • Gaetz, S., O'Grady, B., Kidd, S., & Schwan, K. (2016). Without a home: The national youth homelessness survey. Toronto: Canadian Observatory on Homelessness Press. Retrieved from http://homelesshub.ca/sites/default/files/WithoutAHome-final.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Gaetz, S., & Redman, M. (2016). Federal investment in youth homelessness: Comparing Canada and the United States and a proposal for reinvestment. Canadian observatory on homelessness policy brief. Toronto, ON: The Homeless Hub Press. Retrieved from http://homelesshub.ca/sites/default/files/Policy_Brief.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Goodkind JR, Amer S, Christian C, Hess JM, Bybee D, Isakson BL, Baca B, Ndayisenga M, Greene RN, Shantzek C. Challenges and Innovations in a Community-Based Participatory Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Educ Behav. 2017 Feb;44(1):123-130. doi: 10.1177/1090198116639243. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

    PMID: 27179291BACKGROUND
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hwang SW, Burns T. Health interventions for people who are homeless. Lancet. 2014 Oct 25;384(9953):1541-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61133-8.

    PMID: 25390579BACKGROUND
  • Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E.A., Becker, A.B., Allen, III, Guzman, R.J., & Lichtenstein, R. (2018). Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. Oetzel, & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.) (pp. 31-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    BACKGROUND
  • Karabanow, J. (2008). Getting off the street: Exploring the process of young people's street exits. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(6), 772-788. doi:10.1177/0002764207311987.

    BACKGROUND
  • Karabanow, J., Carson, A., & Clement, P. (2010). Leaving the streets: Stories of Canadian youth. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.

    BACKGROUND
  • Karabanow, J., Kidd, S., Frederick, T., & Hughes, J. (2016). Toward housing stability: Exiting homelessness as an emerging adult. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 43(1), 121- 148. Retrieved from https://wmich.edu/socialworkjournal

    BACKGROUND
  • Kawabata, M., & Gastaldo, D. (2015). The less said, the better: Interpreting silence in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Research Methods, 14(4), 1-9. doi:10.1177/1609406915618123.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kidd, S.A., Frederick, T., Karabanow, J., Hughes, J., Naylor, T., & Barbic, S. (2016). A mixed methods study of recently homeless youth efforts to sustain housing and stability. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(3), 207-218. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0424.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kozloff N, Adair CE, Palma Lazgare LI, Poremski D, Cheung AH, Sandu R, Stergiopoulos V. "Housing First" for Homeless Youth With Mental Illness. Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4):e20161514. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1514.

    PMID: 27681009BACKGROUND
  • Kulik DM, Gaetz S, Crowe C, Ford-Jones EL. Homeless youth's overwhelming health burden: A review of the literature. Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Jun;16(6):e43-7. doi: 10.1093/pch/16.6.e43.

    PMID: 22654549BACKGROUND
  • Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455-485. doi: 10.1177/146613810343007.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lee, R. M., & Robbins S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232-241. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232.

    BACKGROUND
  • Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3496.

    PMID: 19744976BACKGROUND
  • Loiselle, C.G., Profetto-McGrath, J., Polit, D.F., & Tatano Beck, C.T. (2004). Canadian essentials of nursing research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    BACKGROUND
  • Luchenski S, Maguire N, Aldridge RW, Hayward A, Story A, Perri P, Withers J, Clint S, Fitzpatrick S, Hewett N. What works in inclusion health: overview of effective interventions for marginalised and excluded populations. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):266-280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31959-1. Epub 2017 Nov 12.

    PMID: 29137868BACKGROUND
  • Madison, D.S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mayock, P., O'Sullivan, E., & Corr, M.L. (2011). Young people exiting homelessness: An exploration of process, meaning and definition. Housing Studies, 26(6), 803-826. doi:10.1080/02673037.2011.593131.

    BACKGROUND
  • McCay, E., Carter, C., Aiello, A., Quesnel, S., Langley, J., Hwang, S., .... Karabanow, J. (2015). Dialectical Behavior Therapy as a catalyst for change in street-involved youth: A mixed methods study. Children and Youth Services Review, 58, 187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.09.021.

    BACKGROUND
  • Milburn NG, Rice E, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Mallett S, Rosenthal D, Batterham P, May SJ, Witkin A, Duan N. Adolescents Exiting Homelessness Over Two Years: The Risk Amplification and Abatement Model. J Res Adolesc. 2009 Dec 1;19(4):762-785. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00610.x.

    PMID: 25067896BACKGROUND
  • Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.

    PMID: 25791983BACKGROUND
  • Ontario Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). Housing as a human right. Retrieved from http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/right-home-report-consultation-human-rights-and-rental-housing-ontario/housing-human-right

    BACKGROUND
  • Popay, J., Escorel, S., Hernandez, M., Johnston, H., Mathieson, J., & Rispel, L. (2008). Understanding and tackling social exclusion: Final report to the WHO commission on social determinants of health from the social exclusion knowledge network. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/social_determinants/themes/socialexclusion/en/

    BACKGROUND
  • Prasad, P. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the postpositivist traditions. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    BACKGROUND
  • Public Interest. (2009). Changing patterns for street involved youth. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved from http://www.worldvision.ca/Programs-and- Projects/Canadian Programs/Documents/ChangingPatternsForStreetInvolvedYouth.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Quilgars, D., & Pleace, N. (2016). Housing First and Social Integration: A Realistic Aim? Social Inclusion, 4(4), 5-15. doi:10.17645/si.v4i4.672.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rutman, A., Hubberstey, A., Barlow, A., & Brown, E. (2005). Supporting young people's transitions from care: Reflections on doing participatory action research with youth from care. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 153-179). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press/Women's Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Slesnick N, Dashora P, Letcher A, Erdem G, Serovich J. A Review of Services and Interventions for Runaway and Homeless Youth: Moving Forward. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009 Jul;31(7):732-742. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.01.006.

    PMID: 20161294BACKGROUND
  • SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. (2018). Dedoose (Version 8.0.35) [web application]. Retrieved from http://www.dedoose.com

    BACKGROUND
  • Solar, O., & Irwin, A. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health: Social determinants of health discussion paper 2. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/ConceptualframeworkforactiononS DH_eng.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Solomon, P., Cavanaugh, M.M., & Draine, J. (2009). Randomized controlled trials: Design and implementation for community-based psychosocial interventions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Stergiopoulos V, Gozdzik A, O'Campo P, Holtby AR, Jeyaratnam J, Tsemberis S. Housing First: exploring participants' early support needs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 13;14:167. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-167.

    PMID: 24725374BACKGROUND
  • Strega, B. (2005). The view from the poststructural margins: Epistemology and methodology reconsidered. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, & anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 199-235). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press/Women's Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):8-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82352.

    PMID: 21772732BACKGROUND
  • Thompson, A. E., Greeson, J. K., & Brunsink, A. M. (2016). Natural mentoring among older youth in and aging out of foster care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Thulien NS, Gastaldo D, Hwang SW, McCay E. The elusive goal of social integration: A critical examination of the socio-economic and psychosocial consequences experienced by homeless young people who obtain housing. Can J Public Health. 2018 Feb;109(1):89-98. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0029-6.

    PMID: 29981071BACKGROUND
  • Toro PA, Passero Rabideau JM, Bellavia CW, Daeschler CV, Wall DD, Thomas DM, Smith SJ. Evaluating an intervention for homeless persons: results of a field experiment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):476-84. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.3.476.

    PMID: 9170771BACKGROUND
  • Urbaniak, G.C., & Plous,S. (2013). Research Randomizer (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.randomizer.org

    BACKGROUND
  • Van Dam L, Smit D, Wildschut B, Branje SJT, Rhodes JE, Assink M, Stams GJJM. Does Natural Mentoring Matter? A Multilevel Meta-analysis on the Association Between Natural Mentoring and Youth Outcomes. Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;62(1-2):203-220. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12248. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

    PMID: 29691865BACKGROUND
  • Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23. doi: 10.1177/1524839906289376. Epub 2006 Jun 7.

    PMID: 16760238BACKGROUND
  • Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

    PMID: 20147663BACKGROUND
  • Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J.G., & Minkler, M. (2018). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    BACKGROUND
  • Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

    PMID: 21318011BACKGROUND
  • Thulien NS, Amiri A, Hwang SW, Kozloff N, Wang A, Akdikmen A, Roglich J, Nisenbaum R. Effect of Portable Rent Subsidies and Mentorship on Socioeconomic Inclusion for Young People Exiting Homelessness: A Community-Based Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238670. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38670.

  • Thulien NS, Hwang SW, Kozloff N, Nisenbaum R, Akdikmen A, Fambegbe OP, Feraday R, Mathewson C, Mutamiri M, Roglich J, Wang A, Zagala M, Amiri A. "When I think about my future, I just see darkness": How youth exiting homelessness navigate the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion. Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):893-905. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00804-2. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

  • Thulien NS, Kozloff N, McCay E, Nisenbaum R, Wang A, Hwang SW. Evaluating the Effects of a Rent Subsidy and Mentoring Intervention for Youth Transitioning Out of Homelessness: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Community-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 20;8(12):e15557. doi: 10.2196/15557.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Social IsolationSocial Identification

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Social BehaviorBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Naomi Thulien
Organization
Unity Health Toronto

Study Officials

  • Naomi S Thulien, RN, PhD

    Unity Health Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study will employ a convergent mixed methods design (i.e., quantitative and qualitative data are collected concurrently, and the findings combined) embedded within a RCT and a CBPAR framework. 24 participants will be assessed for eligibility, and then randomized into 1 of 2 arms using covariate adaptive randomization. 12 are allocated to the intervention group (rent subsidies + mentoring), while 12 are allocated to the control group (rent subsidies only). Participants in the intervention group (n = 12) will be matched with an adult mentor recruited by one of the community partners. Mentors are selected and matched through one-on-one interviews with someone in a leadership role within the organization. A common mentoring guide will be used for all sites; these booklets cover information ranging from ideal mentor characteristics to mentor code of conduct.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2018

First Posted

December 19, 2018

Study Start

February 28, 2019

Primary Completion

March 31, 2022

Study Completion

March 31, 2022

Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Results First Posted

January 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations