Study Stopped
COVID 19 and recruitment problems
The Effect of Lacosamide in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to compare the change in pain intensity during treatment with a sodium-channel blocker (lacosamide) in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2022
CompletedFebruary 16, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.4 years
December 14, 2018
February 15, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity
The difference in the mean value of the patient's daily ratings of average pain intensity in the baseline week and the last week during treatment as experienced during the past 24 hours rated on a 0-10 point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain). The primary objective is to compare the change in pain intensity from baseline to last week of lacosamide treatment in patients with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype in the PP population. The supportive objective is to compare the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo in the two phenotype groups in the PP population. Although we do not expect a phenotype difference in the response to placebo, a comparison of the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo is needed to justify that the phenotype is a predictive biomarker for the effect of lacosamide.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain relief
12 weeks
Use of escape medicine (paracetamol) during treatment period.
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Lacosamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORLacosamide (50 mg) are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo are given as capsules, same as lacosamide, and taken orally twice a day, without active ingredient.
Interventions
Lacosamide (50 mg) and identical placebo are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain for at least 3 months (Finnerup et al. 2016)
- Average pain intensity of at least 4 and not above 9 on a 0-10 NRS during the 7-day baseline week (Dworkin et al. 2012).
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Other causes of pain in the same area, or other concomitant pain that cannot be distinguished from the neuropathic pain
- Patient who cannot cooperate or are unable to complete the project and patients who do not speak Danish.
- Known and current cardiac conduction disturbance (2⁰ or 3⁰ atrioventricular (AV) block, prolonged QTc interval \> 450 ms, heart rate \<50 or \>110 bpm, a QRS interval \>120ms (ECG required)), significant cardiac, renal or liver disease or other severe illness. In patients treated with pregabalin also PQ interval \> 0,2s and cardiac disease. Sitting diastolic blood pressure below 50 mmHg or above 105 mmHg.
- Major depressive episode within 6 months, recurrent depressive disorder or other significant psychiatric disease, alcohol, illicit drug or drug abuse.
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Woman of childbearing potential, unless they use and acceptable effective contraception measure as defined in the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG) during the study and at least 2 weeks after, or if their male partner is vasectomized and their sole partners. Negative pregnancy test is required.
- Known allergy to lacosamide or excipients.
- Concomitant pain treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, topical analgesics (lidocaine, capsaicin), lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, cannabinoids or strong opioids that cannot be discontinued. Other treatment for neuropathic pain are allowed in a stable dose (from 14 days before randomization to completion of the trial), if they cannot be tapered off completely.
- Concomitant treatment with products known to be associated with PQ (PR) prolongation other than pregabalin.
- Patients inappropriate for placebo
- Planned surgery
- Use of sodium channel blockers within at least five half-lives and investigational drugs within 30 days.
- Patients on controlled sodium diet, unless the amount of sodium in the capsules is acceptable for their diet.
- The score "yes" on item 4 or item 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), if the ideation occurred in the past 6 months, or "yes on any item of the Suicidal Behaviour section, except for the "Non-suicidal Self Injurious Behaviour" if this behaviour occurred in the past 2 years.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Danish Pain Research Centerlead
- Odense University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.
PMID: 27115670BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rowbotham MC, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bellamy N, Bhagwagar Z, Costello A, Cowan P, Fang WC, Hertz S, Jay GW, Junor R, Kerns RD, Kerwin R, Kopecky EA, Lissin D, Malamut R, Markman JD, McDermott MP, Munera C, Porter L, Rauschkolb C, Rice ASC, Sampaio C, Skljarevski V, Sommerville K, Stacey BR, Steigerwald I, Tobias J, Trentacosti AM, Wasan AD, Wells GA, Williams J, Witter J, Ziegler D. Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
PMID: 22494920BACKGROUNDCarmland ME, Kreutzfeldt M, Holbech JV, Andersen NT, Jensen TS, Bach FW, Sindrup SH, Finnerup NB. Effect of lacosamide in peripheral neuropathic pain: study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, phenotype-stratified trial. Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3695-7.
PMID: 31604475DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nanna B Finnerup, Professor
Danish Pain Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2018
First Posted
December 19, 2018
Study Start
January 15, 2019
Primary Completion
June 3, 2022
Study Completion
June 3, 2022
Last Updated
February 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02