NCT03777956

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to compare the change in pain intensity during treatment with a sodium-channel blocker (lacosamide) in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2018

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2019

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 3, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 3, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity

    The difference in the mean value of the patient's daily ratings of average pain intensity in the baseline week and the last week during treatment as experienced during the past 24 hours rated on a 0-10 point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain). The primary objective is to compare the change in pain intensity from baseline to last week of lacosamide treatment in patients with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype in the PP population. The supportive objective is to compare the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo in the two phenotype groups in the PP population. Although we do not expect a phenotype difference in the response to placebo, a comparison of the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo is needed to justify that the phenotype is a predictive biomarker for the effect of lacosamide.

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain relief

    12 weeks

  • Use of escape medicine (paracetamol) during treatment period.

    12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Lacosamide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lacosamide (50 mg) are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.

Drug: Lacosamide

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo are given as capsules, same as lacosamide, and taken orally twice a day, without active ingredient.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Lacosamide (50 mg) and identical placebo are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.

Lacosamide

Identical placebo are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain for at least 3 months (Finnerup et al. 2016)
  • Average pain intensity of at least 4 and not above 9 on a 0-10 NRS during the 7-day baseline week (Dworkin et al. 2012).
  • Written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Other causes of pain in the same area, or other concomitant pain that cannot be distinguished from the neuropathic pain
  • Patient who cannot cooperate or are unable to complete the project and patients who do not speak Danish.
  • Known and current cardiac conduction disturbance (2⁰ or 3⁰ atrioventricular (AV) block, prolonged QTc interval \> 450 ms, heart rate \<50 or \>110 bpm, a QRS interval \>120ms (ECG required)), significant cardiac, renal or liver disease or other severe illness. In patients treated with pregabalin also PQ interval \> 0,2s and cardiac disease. Sitting diastolic blood pressure below 50 mmHg or above 105 mmHg.
  • Major depressive episode within 6 months, recurrent depressive disorder or other significant psychiatric disease, alcohol, illicit drug or drug abuse.
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Woman of childbearing potential, unless they use and acceptable effective contraception measure as defined in the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG) during the study and at least 2 weeks after, or if their male partner is vasectomized and their sole partners. Negative pregnancy test is required.
  • Known allergy to lacosamide or excipients.
  • Concomitant pain treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, topical analgesics (lidocaine, capsaicin), lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, cannabinoids or strong opioids that cannot be discontinued. Other treatment for neuropathic pain are allowed in a stable dose (from 14 days before randomization to completion of the trial), if they cannot be tapered off completely.
  • Concomitant treatment with products known to be associated with PQ (PR) prolongation other than pregabalin.
  • Patients inappropriate for placebo
  • Planned surgery
  • Use of sodium channel blockers within at least five half-lives and investigational drugs within 30 days.
  • Patients on controlled sodium diet, unless the amount of sodium in the capsules is acceptable for their diet.
  • The score "yes" on item 4 or item 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), if the ideation occurred in the past 6 months, or "yes on any item of the Suicidal Behaviour section, except for the "Non-suicidal Self Injurious Behaviour" if this behaviour occurred in the past 2 years.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, 8200, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.

    PMID: 27115670BACKGROUND
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rowbotham MC, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bellamy N, Bhagwagar Z, Costello A, Cowan P, Fang WC, Hertz S, Jay GW, Junor R, Kerns RD, Kerwin R, Kopecky EA, Lissin D, Malamut R, Markman JD, McDermott MP, Munera C, Porter L, Rauschkolb C, Rice ASC, Sampaio C, Skljarevski V, Sommerville K, Stacey BR, Steigerwald I, Tobias J, Trentacosti AM, Wasan AD, Wells GA, Williams J, Witter J, Ziegler D. Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

    PMID: 22494920BACKGROUND
  • Carmland ME, Kreutzfeldt M, Holbech JV, Andersen NT, Jensen TS, Bach FW, Sindrup SH, Finnerup NB. Effect of lacosamide in peripheral neuropathic pain: study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, phenotype-stratified trial. Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3695-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeuralgiaNeuritisNeuropathy, PainfulDiabetic Neuropathies

Interventions

Lacosamide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAcetatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic Acids

Study Officials

  • Nanna B Finnerup, Professor

    Danish Pain Research Center

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2018

First Posted

December 19, 2018

Study Start

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion

June 3, 2022

Study Completion

June 3, 2022

Last Updated

February 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Locations