Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Conjunction With Regional Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Operative shoulder arthroscopy under regional block anesthesia often presents with hemodynamic challenges for the anesthesiologist, knowing that a low systolic blood pressure is required to minimize the bleeding. Regional anesthesia is successfully performed to many patients in whom tracheal intubation or the placement of a laryngeal tube is undesired. Propofol has traditionally been used to provide sedation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy under regional anesthesia. In contrast to Propofol, Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoceptor agonist that has been shown to provide sedation, analgesia and anxiolytic effects with minimal respiratory depression. Due to the effect of both drugs on blood pressure, the investigators set out to compare intraoperative hemodynamics of both drugs, along with the surgeon's satisfaction and the degree of comfort provided to patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopy. The investigators also assessed whether the type of anesthetic agent used for sedation accounted for other differences in intra and post-operative outcome measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2018
CompletedDecember 17, 2018
December 1, 2018
1 year
November 18, 2018
December 13, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
iSBP
initial Systolic Blood Pressure (iSBP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
Hour 0
iMAP
initial Mean Arterial blood Pressure (iMAP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
Hour 0
SBP
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from iSBP
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
MAP
change in Mean Arterial blood Pressure from iMAP
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Surgeon Satisfaction: Global satisfaction scale
Global satisfaction of the surgeon regarding anesthesia and patient immobility on a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) collected at the end of surgery
up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Estimation of Bleeding
Surgeon's evaluation of the bleeding that had affected the surgeon's visibility on a scale from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (very intense bleeding) collected at the end of surgery
up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Occurence of Hypotension
number of episodes of hypotension ( a drop of systolic blood pressure \>30% of the initial value recorded at patient arrival to the operating theatre)
up to 0 minutes after admission to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Secondary Outcomes (17)
RR
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
BPM
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
SaO2
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Vasopressors OR
up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU
Vasopressors PACU
up to 3 hours after surgery completion
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
BIS level
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Ramsay sedation scale
at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Sedation Duration
up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Propofol. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 2mg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 4 mg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four.
Dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Dexmedetomidine. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 1mcg/kg over 10 minutes then 0.2 mcg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 0.7 mcg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four with a maximum.
Interventions
patients in both groups are programmed for an elective shoulder arthroscopy surgery
patients in both groups received regional block for anesthesia: brachial plexus blockade was performed using the interscalene approach under ultrasound combined to nerve stimulation. 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% were injected.
propofol 10mg/ml was used for sedation as described in the arms section
Dexmedetomidine was diluted to 4mcg/ml and used for sedation as described in the arms section
sedation level was monitored using bispectral index to achieve values described in the arms group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) I or II.
- Elective Shoulder arthroscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergies to any of the used medications.
- ASA score of III or above.
- Cardiac abnormalities.
- Contraindications to regional blocks.
- Patient refusal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hotel Dieu de France Hospital
Beirut, 166830, Lebanon
Related Publications (3)
Peng K, Li J, Ji FH, Li Z. Dexmedetomidine compared with propofol for pediatric sedation during cerebral angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jun;19(6):549-54.
PMID: 25197298BACKGROUNDKim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3671-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671.
PMID: 25834336BACKGROUNDWu Y, Zhang Y, Hu X, Qian C, Zhou Y, Xie J. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.
PMID: 25970229BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hicham A ABOU ZEID, M.D., M.Sc.
Saint Joseph University School of Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nouhad S AYOUB, M.D.
Saint Joseph University School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- surgeons, patients as well as the outcome assessor were blinded in regards of the drug used for sedation during surgery (Propofol vs dexmedetomidine)
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2018
First Posted
December 14, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 15, 2018
Last Updated
December 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share