NCT03775876

Brief Summary

Operative shoulder arthroscopy under regional block anesthesia often presents with hemodynamic challenges for the anesthesiologist, knowing that a low systolic blood pressure is required to minimize the bleeding. Regional anesthesia is successfully performed to many patients in whom tracheal intubation or the placement of a laryngeal tube is undesired. Propofol has traditionally been used to provide sedation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy under regional anesthesia. In contrast to Propofol, Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoceptor agonist that has been shown to provide sedation, analgesia and anxiolytic effects with minimal respiratory depression. Due to the effect of both drugs on blood pressure, the investigators set out to compare intraoperative hemodynamics of both drugs, along with the surgeon's satisfaction and the degree of comfort provided to patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopy. The investigators also assessed whether the type of anesthetic agent used for sedation accounted for other differences in intra and post-operative outcome measures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

PropofolDexmedetomidineRegional anesthesiaSatisfactionShoulder arthroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • iSBP

    initial Systolic Blood Pressure (iSBP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.

    Hour 0

  • iMAP

    initial Mean Arterial blood Pressure (iMAP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.

    Hour 0

  • SBP

    Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from iSBP

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • MAP

    change in Mean Arterial blood Pressure from iMAP

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • Surgeon Satisfaction: Global satisfaction scale

    Global satisfaction of the surgeon regarding anesthesia and patient immobility on a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) collected at the end of surgery

    up to 1 hour after surgery completion

  • Estimation of Bleeding

    Surgeon's evaluation of the bleeding that had affected the surgeon's visibility on a scale from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (very intense bleeding) collected at the end of surgery

    up to 1 hour after surgery completion

  • Occurence of Hypotension

    number of episodes of hypotension ( a drop of systolic blood pressure \>30% of the initial value recorded at patient arrival to the operating theatre)

    up to 0 minutes after admission to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • RR

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • BPM

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • SaO2

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • Vasopressors OR

    up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU

  • Vasopressors PACU

    up to 3 hours after surgery completion

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • BIS level

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • Ramsay sedation scale

    at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • Sedation Duration

    up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Propofol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Propofol. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 2mg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 4 mg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four.

Procedure: Shoulder ArthroscopyProcedure: Regional BlockDrug: PropofolDiagnostic Test: BIS

Dexmedetomidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Dexmedetomidine. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 1mcg/kg over 10 minutes then 0.2 mcg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 0.7 mcg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four with a maximum.

Procedure: Shoulder ArthroscopyProcedure: Regional BlockDrug: DexmedetomidineDiagnostic Test: BIS

Interventions

patients in both groups are programmed for an elective shoulder arthroscopy surgery

Also known as: Surgery
DexmedetomidinePropofol

patients in both groups received regional block for anesthesia: brachial plexus blockade was performed using the interscalene approach under ultrasound combined to nerve stimulation. 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% were injected.

Also known as: Interscalene brachial plexus block
DexmedetomidinePropofol

propofol 10mg/ml was used for sedation as described in the arms section

Also known as: Propofol-Lipuro
Propofol

Dexmedetomidine was diluted to 4mcg/ml and used for sedation as described in the arms section

Also known as: Dexmedetomidine Hcl 100 mcg (Micrograms)/ml Inj
Dexmedetomidine
BISDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

sedation level was monitored using bispectral index to achieve values described in the arms group

Also known as: Bispectral index
DexmedetomidinePropofol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) I or II.
  • Elective Shoulder arthroscopy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergies to any of the used medications.
  • ASA score of III or above.
  • Cardiac abnormalities.
  • Contraindications to regional blocks.
  • Patient refusal.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hotel Dieu de France Hospital

Beirut, 166830, Lebanon

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Peng K, Li J, Ji FH, Li Z. Dexmedetomidine compared with propofol for pediatric sedation during cerebral angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jun;19(6):549-54.

    PMID: 25197298BACKGROUND
  • Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3671-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671.

    PMID: 25834336BACKGROUND
  • Wu Y, Zhang Y, Hu X, Qian C, Zhou Y, Xie J. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.

    PMID: 25970229BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Personal Satisfaction

Interventions

Surgical Procedures, OperativePropofolDexmedetomidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Hicham A ABOU ZEID, M.D., M.Sc.

    Saint Joseph University School of Medicine

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Nouhad S AYOUB, M.D.

    Saint Joseph University School of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
surgeons, patients as well as the outcome assessor were blinded in regards of the drug used for sedation during surgery (Propofol vs dexmedetomidine)
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: randomised controlled double blind trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2018

First Posted

December 14, 2018

Study Start

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 15, 2018

Last Updated

December 17, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations