Counter-referral System Improvement Collaborative
BIDCR-R
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Improvement Collaborative Strategy to Improve the Counter-referral System of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in the Public Healthcare Sector in Argentina
2 other identifiers
interventional
510
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Coordination between different levels of care has been identified as one of the main components of care among people with chronic diseases. In this sense, an adequate referral and counter-reference system facilitates the management of the care process with timely access to the required referral. The objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy that improves the counter- referral process in patients with cardiovascular diseases in the public health system. Population: The study will be carried out in selected hospitals of the provinces of Mendoza, Tucumán and Salta in Argentina. Patients who have been hospitalized with a diagnosis of heart failure, hypertension (requires hospitalization) and / or coronary disease (unstable angina) will be included. Design and methods: a Randomized clinical study by clusters. 10 hospital will be included: 5 will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention to increase the improve counter referral rates (improvement cycles) and 5 to the control branch (usual care). 51 participants will be included in each hospital, in total, 510 participants. Intervention: An innovative vision is proposed, which combines a participatory and dynamic methodology based on improvement cycles. This approach includes the implementation of participatory learning sessions for health providers, involving the effectors of the design of the intervention. In the intervention branch at least 6 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices. Each one of the sessions will constitute an analysis of the improvement cycle, following the following steps: 1) Selection of participants of the initial workshop; 2) Development of work model based on bibliographic review and initial qualitative phase; 3) Initial workshop with effectors for training in continuous improvement, objectives, interventions and data collection; 4) Learning workshops to discuss results, applicability of interventions and modifications to the work plan; 5) Closing session to evaluate preliminary results and discuss continuity of interventions beyond the project. Outcomes: 1) consultation in the PHC after hospital discharge; 2) readmission's; 3) consultations in the hospital; 4) follow-up in the PHC; 5) patient perspective (satisfaction).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
Started Jun 2018
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedApril 23, 2024
April 1, 2024
1.5 years
December 6, 2018
April 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients visits in a primary health center (PHC) after hospital discharge
proportion of visits made in a primary care center (PHC) after hospital discharge
3 months after enrollment and/or end of study
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Effective counter reference performed by physicians
3 months after enrollment and/or end of study
Time to the first consultation in a PHC after the hospital discharge
3 months after enrollment and/or .end of study
Cardiovascular hospital readmission's
3 months after enrollment and/or end of study
Cardiovascular re consultations at the second level of care
3 months after enrollment and/or end of study
Patients satisfaction with the primary health level measured by adapted PCAT questions
4 months
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe participants belonging to the hospitals assigned to the control group the health providers will give feedback on their health condition and will advise on how to follow up their care after discharge or referral back to PHC following usual practice.
Improvement cycle
EXPERIMENTALIn participants belonging to the hospitals assigned to the intervention group,the health providers will give feedback on their health condition and will advise on how to follow up their care after discharge or referral back to PHC using innovative intervention to assure continuity of care and assistant level approach. This innovations will be crafted from the rapid improvement cycles considering the environment and key aspects of the every day care at the participating centers.
Interventions
at least 6 workshops (sessions) will be held with the members of the care system, in order to identify opportunities for improvement oriented to the design and application of an innovative intervention based on best practices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects that only have public health coverage or PAMI
- Adults over 18 year of age
- Patients admitted to the hospital with diagnosis of: non valvular heart failure and/or complicated hypertension ( that requires hospitalization) and/or coronary heart disease ( unstable angina)
- Residence in the area of influence of the hospitals
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Anticoagulated patients
- People who are immobilized
- People who do not give their informed consent
- People who plan to move in the next 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Hospital A Italo Perrupato
San Martín, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Hospital Teodoro J. Schestakow
San Rafael, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Hospital Antonio J. Scaravelli
Tunuyán, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Hospital N. Joaquín Castellano
General Güemes, Salta Province, Argentina
Hospital Centro de Salud Zenón J. Santillán
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina
Hospital Ángel C. Padilla
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina
Hospital Central
Mendoza, Argentina
Hospital Luis Lagomaggiore
Mendoza, Argentina
Hospital Papa Francisco
Salta, Argentina
Hospital San Bernardo
Salta, Argentina
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vilma Irazola, MD
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ezequiel García Elorrio, PhD
Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2018
First Posted
December 14, 2018
Study Start
June 8, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04