NCT03773562

Brief Summary

Researchers are trying to determine if there is a difference between brain images of subjects that do respond to treatment with erenumab and subjects who do not respond to treatment with erenumab using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 25, 2019

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 9, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2018

Results QC Date

June 26, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

MigraineMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain StructureBrain Function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Resting State Functional Connectivity

    Brain MRI resting state functional connectivity measured as global efficiency percentage. An increase in global efficiency suggests an improvement in the ability of the brain regions to functionally communicate on a global scale. Efficiency relates to the network. In this case, the investigators defined the network to be the pain matrix. Increased efficiency would mean the connectivity within the matrix is increased and more efficient. This has not been attributed to a clinical outcome but is rather a characteristic of the network.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Erenumab Responders

    8 weeks

  • Iron Accumulation in Periaqueductal Gray Brain Region

    8 weeks

  • Iron Accumulation in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Brain Region

    8 weeks

  • Change in the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire (MIDAS)

    Baseline, 8 weeks

  • ROI-ROI Functional Connectivity of Middle Temporal Left With Supramarginal Gyrus Right Regions of the Brain

    8 weeks

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Erenumab

OTHER

All participants receive erenumab 140mg by subcutaneous injection at baseline and again 4 weeks later.

Drug: Erenumab

Interventions

Erenumab will be used per label instructions.

Also known as: Aimovig
Erenumab

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age
  • Episodic migraine (with or without aura) or chronic migraine according to the diagnostic criteria included within the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 (ICHD-3)
  • migraine days per month on average over the 3 months prior to screening, confirmed by run-in phase prospective data collection
  • Duration since migraine onset of at least 12 months prior to screening based on medical records and/or patient self-report

You may not qualify if:

  • Older than 50 years of age at migraine onset
  • History of cluster headache or hemiplegic migraine
  • Continuous headache pain (i.e. no pain-free periods of any duration during the one month before screening)
  • Opioid- or butalbital-containing analgesics on 6 or more days per month during the 2 months prior to the start of the baseline phase
  • History of major psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
  • History or evidence of any unstable or clinically significant medical condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion
  • No therapeutic response in migraine prevention after an adequate therapeutic trial of 4 or more of the following medication categories: Category 1- divalproex sodium, sodium valproate; Category 2- topiramate; Category 3- beta-blockers; Category 4- tricyclic antidepressants; Category 5- venlafaxine or desvenlafaxine, duloxetine or milnacipran; Category 6- flunarizine, verapamil; Category 7- lisinopril, candesartan; Category 8- botulinum toxin. No therapeutic response is defined as no reduction in headache frequency, duration, or severity after administration of the medication for at least 6 weeks at the generally accepted therapeutic dose(s) based on the investigator's assessment. Lack of sustained response to a medication and failure to tolerate a therapeutic dose are not considered to be "no therapeutic response".
  • Concomitant use of 3 or more of the following medications for migraine prevention within 2 months before the start of the baseline phase or throughout the study: divalproex sodium, sodium valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, gabapentin, beta-blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran, flunarizine, verapamil, lomerizine, lisinopril, candesartan, clonidine, guanfacine, cyproheptadine, methysergide, pizotifen, butterbur, feverfew, magnesium (at least 600 mg per day), riboflavin (at least 100 mg per day). Use of up to two medications is permitted as long as the dose has been stable for at least 2 months before the start of the run-in phase and during the study.
  • Botulinum toxin (in the head and/or neck region) within 4 months before the start of the baseline phase and throughout the study
  • Ergotamine derivatives, steroids, and triptans used for migraine prophylaxis within 2 months before the start of the baseline phase and throughout the study
  • Procedures (e.g. nerve blocks) used for migraine prophylaxis within 2 months before the start of the baseline phase and throughout the study
  • History of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, coronary artery bypass surgery, or other revascularization procedures within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Contraindications to MRI including, but not limited to: Metal implants, aneurysm clips, severe claustrophobia, implanted electronic devices, insulin or infusion pump, cochlear/otologic/ear implant, non-removable prosthesis, implanted shunts/catheters, certain intrauterine devices, tattooed makeup, body piercings that cannot be removed, metal fragments, wire sutures or metal staples.
  • Factors that Reduce MR Image Quality and Interpretability: dental braces or other non-removable devices (e.g. retainers); prior brain surgery; known brain MRI abnormality that in the investigator's opinion will significantly impact MRI data
  • Sensory disorders that in the investigator's opinion might affect perception of cutaneous thermal stimuli (e.g. peripheral neuropathy)
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Schwedt TJ, Nikolova S, Dumkrieger G, Li J, Wu T, Chong CD. Longitudinal changes in functional connectivity and pain-induced brain activations in patients with migraine: a functional MRI study pre- and post- treatment with Erenumab. J Headache Pain. 2022 Dec 14;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01526-5.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Migraine Disorders

Interventions

erenumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, PrimaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Todd Schwedt
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Todd J Schwedt

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Posted

December 12, 2018

Study Start

March 25, 2019

Primary Completion

June 30, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

January 9, 2024

Results First Posted

January 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations