Indirect Pulp Treatment in Primary Molars
RCT
Evaluation of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Liner (Vitrebond™) Versus Calcium Hydroxide as Indirect Pulp Treatment Material Used in Deep Carious Lesions in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and the radiographic success of Dycal and Vitrebond as indirect pulp treatment materials in primary molars.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2018
CompletedAugust 30, 2019
August 1, 2019
1 year
August 18, 2018
August 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Number of cases reporting postoperative pain
Presence of postoperative pain following dental treatment through patient questionnaire as a sign of clinical failure
12 months
Number of cases reporting swelling
Presence of postoperative swelling following dental treatment through visual examination using hand mirror as a sign of clinical failure
12 months
Number of cases reporting sinus
Presence of sinus following dental treatment through visual examination using hand mirror as a sign of clinical failure
12 months
Number of cases reporting fistula
Presence of fistula following dental treatment through visual examination using hand mirror as a sign of clinical failure
12 months
Number of cases reporting tooth mobility
Presence of abnormal tooth mobility following dental treatment through tactile examination using two hand mirrors as a sign of clinical failure
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of cases reporting external root resorption
12 months
Number of cases reporting internal root resorption
12 months
Number of cases reporting furcation involvement
12 months
Number of cases reporting widening of periodontal membrane space
12 months
Number of cases reporting periapical radiolucency
12 months
Study Arms (2)
IPT using Dycal (TM )
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndirect pulp treatment; IPT using Dycal (TM ); (2 paste system) by partial caries removal
IPT using Vitrebond (TM )
EXPERIMENTALIndirect pulp treatment; IPT using Vitrebond (TM );(powder and liquid) by partial caries removal
Interventions
Partial caries removal and protection of the dental pulp with biocompatible material
Partial caries removal and protection of the dental pulp with biocompatible material
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In compliance with AAPD, 2017 guidelines for pulp therapy "IPT is indicated in a primary tooth with no pulpitis or with reversible pulpitis when the deepest carious dentin is not removed to avoid a pulp exposure. The pulp is judged by clinical and radiographic criteria to be vital and able to heal from the carious insult"
- In addition to:
- I-Subjects:
- Medically free children, their parent(s) accepts to sign the informed consent.
- Age range from 4-8 years.
- II-Molars:
- Presence of at least 1 primary molar with deep carious lesion extending to more than one half of the dentin on radiographic examination (to make the trial regardless of number of carious molars).
- Clinically: Normal mobility and normal appearance of gingiva (vital teeth).
- Radiographically: Normal roots without physiological resorption, normal lamina dura and normal periodontal membrane space (indicated for IPT).
You may not qualify if:
- I-Subjects:
- Uncooperative children.
- Parents unable to attend follow up visits (even after explaining the importance of recall visits).
- II-Molars:
- History of spontaneous pain (to exclude reversible pulpitis).
- Clinically: Presence of swelling, sinus, fistula or tooth mobility (to exclude non vital teeth).
- Radiographically: Presence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region or external or internal resorption (to exclude teeth not indicated for IPT).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
Cairo, 11553, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shereen E Taha, Professor
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher assisstant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2018
First Posted
December 10, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
final results