RIB PAIN (Rib Fractures Treated With Parental Analgesia With Infused LidocaiNe)
RIB PAIN
A Randomized Control Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine for the Management of Traumatic Rib Fractures: a Single Trauma Centre Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traumatic rib fractures (RF) are a relatively common occurrence in patients of all ages, with a 10% incidence in all trauma patients and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adequate analgesia is paramount for preventing pulmonary complications and can reduce morbidity and mortality. There is longstanding evidence of lidocaine's effectiveness and safety in the post-operative patient and the investigators hypothesize that this modality may prove to be ideal in trauma patients with RF. Therefore, it is imperative that intravenous lidocaine be investigated to ascertain if there is significant benefit for pain reduction in patients who have sustained rib fractures. A single-centre, double-blind, randomized control trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a 72-96 hour IV lidocaine infusion plus standard analgesics versus placebo infusion plus standard analgesics will be performed on patients (age 18 or older) diagnosed with two or more traumatic rib fractures ,from blunt thoracic trauma, requiring hospital admission at Victoria Hospital. The primary outcome is mean pain score, as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) when the patient is at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes are protocol adherence, patient satisfaction as measured on the VAS, incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, mortality, incidence of lidocaine toxicity, treatment regimens (use of additional non-opioid analgesics) and total morphine equivalents used (including breakthrough doses). This trial will serve to quantify the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine for patients with traumatic rib fractures. Successful completion of a single centre trial will inform the development of a multi-centre trial powered to demonstrate a reduction in respiratory failure in the trauma population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 8, 2019
October 1, 2019
7 months
September 12, 2018
October 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Pain
The primary outcome will be mean pain score calculated from the multiple VAS measures performed during Lidocaine infusions when the patient is at rest and with movement. The VAS for pain is a continuous numerical scale, demonstrated by a horizontal or vertical line, 10 cm long, with verbal descriptors at each end demonstrating the extremes, +/- a central descriptor. It is a scale essentially from 1 to 10, with one being no pain and 10 being the worst pain possible. Subjects mark on the line their approximate pain score by drawing a transecting line. This will be measured with a ruler from the start point on the line and recorded as a data point.
Pain score to be measured before treatment initiation and every 6 hours thereafter until 72-96 hours. Scores will be performed by bedside nursing.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Incidence of Protocol Non-adherence
Will be recorded by the ICU research assistants at the end of each patient's 72-96 hour study period.
Patient satisfaction as measured on the Visual Analogue Scale for Satisfaction
Research assistants will help administer the satisfaction survey to patients as soon as possible following completion of the 72-96 hour Lidocaine infusion.
Incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation
Will be recorded by the ICU research assistants at the end of each patient's 72-96 hour study period.
Hospital length of stay
Will be recorded by the ICU research assistants at the end of each patient's 72-96 hour study period.
ICU length of stay
Will be recorded by the ICU research assistants at the end of each patient's 72-96 hour study period.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control: Standard Care + Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORStandard care (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentin) as directed by MRP care team plus IV placebo (Lactated Ringers). Lactated Ringers will be delivered as a "initial bolus" and then run as a continuous infusion to mimic the volume (as per Kg) of study drug for 72-96 hours. Standard care will be determined by the care team with no limitations introduced by the research team. Medications utilized and dosing regimes will be recorded after the intervention.
Intervention: Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALStandard care (acetaminophen, NSAIDs, opioids, gabapentin) as directed by MRP care team plus IV lidocaine. IV lidocaine will be administered as a bolus dose of 2 mg/kg (maximum dose 100 mg) followed by a 2 mg/kg/hr infusion for 72-96 hrs.
Interventions
IV Lidocaine bolus plus infusion. Weight based.
Placebo IV bolus and infusion. Weight based to mimic lidocaine volume.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients, 18 years or older, admitted to Victoria Hospital's Trauma Service with two or more traumatic rib fractures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years old
- Patients who sustained complex trauma with multiple other injuries or have decreased LOC or required intubation at admission
- Patients with a known allergy/sensitivity to Lidocaine or other local anesthetic, amide anesthetics or components of the solution
- Patients with a known history of hypersensitivity to methylparaben and/or propylparaben (preservatives used in multidose solutions), or to their metabolite para amino benzoic acid
- Patients who do not speak English with adequate fluency to consent or participate in the VAS survey
- Patients receiving epidural analgesia for another reason
- Patients with pre-existing cardiac arrhythmias including Adam-Stokes syndrome; Wolff- Parkinson-White syndrome; and severe degrees of sinoatrial, atrioventricular, or intraventricular heart block (except in patients with a functioning artificial pacemaker)
- Patients who are known to be pregnant or breast feeding, as identified on Past Medical History, or by initial laboratory investigations performed as a part of standard trauma team assessment
- Patients with known hepatic/renal disease, as identified on Past Medical History, or by initial laboratory investigations performed as a part of standard trauma team assessment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
Related Publications (19)
Mayberry JC, Trunkey DD. The fractured rib in chest wall trauma. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997 May;7(2):239-61.
PMID: 9156291BACKGROUNDZiegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):975-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018.
PMID: 7996614BACKGROUNDSirmali M, Turut H, Topcu S, Gulhan E, Yazici U, Kaya S, Tastepe I. A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jul;24(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00256-2.
PMID: 12853057BACKGROUNDSimon BJ, Cushman J, Barraco R, Lane V, Luchette FA, Miglietta M, Roccaforte DJ, Spector R; EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. Pain management guidelines for blunt thoracic trauma. J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1256-67. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000178063.77946.f5. No abstract available.
PMID: 16385313BACKGROUNDWu CL, Jani ND, Perkins FM, Barquist E. Thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the treatment of rib fracture pain after motor vehicle crash. J Trauma. 1999 Sep;47(3):564-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00025.
PMID: 10498316BACKGROUNDCarrier FM, Turgeon AF, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Fergusson DA, Thauvette D, Lessard MR. Effect of epidural analgesia in patients with traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;56(3):230-42. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9052-7. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
PMID: 19247744BACKGROUNDLinton DM, Potgieter PD. Conservative management of blunt chest trauma. S Afr Med J. 1982 Jun 12;61(24):917-9.
PMID: 7046093BACKGROUNDPattinson KT. Opioids and the control of respiration. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jun;100(6):747-58. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen094. Epub 2008 May 1.
PMID: 18456641BACKGROUNDRuppen W, Derry S, McQuay H, Moore RA. Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection, and neurologic injury in obstetric patients with epidural analgesia/anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):394-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200608000-00023.
PMID: 16871074BACKGROUNDAllen DJ, Chae-Kim SH, Trousdale DM. Risks and complications of neuraxial anesthesia and the use of anticoagulation in the surgical patient. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2002 Oct;15(4):369-73. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2002.11927867.
PMID: 16333466BACKGROUNDKarmakar MK, Ho AM. Acute pain management of patients with multiple fractured ribs. J Trauma. 2003 Mar;54(3):615-25. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000053197.40145.62.
PMID: 12634549BACKGROUNDBulger EM, Edwards T, Klotz P, Jurkovich GJ. Epidural analgesia improves outcome after multiple rib fractures. Surgery. 2004 Aug;136(2):426-30. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.019.
PMID: 15300210BACKGROUNDArendt K, Segal S. Why epidurals do not always work. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):49-55.
PMID: 18769661BACKGROUNDMcCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2010 Jun 18;70(9):1149-63. doi: 10.2165/10898560-000000000-00000.
PMID: 20518581BACKGROUNDVigneault L, Turgeon AF, Cote D, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Moore L, McIntyre LA, Nicole PC, Fergusson DA. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;58(1):22-37. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9407-0.
PMID: 21061107BACKGROUNDDaykin H. The efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for analgesia in the older adult: a literature review. Br J Pain. 2017 Feb;11(1):23-31. doi: 10.1177/2049463716676205. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
PMID: 28386401BACKGROUNDNguyen M, Vandenbroucke F, Roy JD, Beaulieu D, Seal RF, Lapointe R, Dagenais M, Roy A, Massicotte L. Evaluation of the addition of bupivacaine to intrathecal morphine and fentanyl for postoperative pain management in laparascopic liver resection. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):261-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181de12e4.
PMID: 20921837BACKGROUNDCherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, Davis C, Fallon M, McQuay H, Mercadante S, Pasternak G, Ventafridda V; Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care Network. Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: an evidence-based report. J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 1;19(9):2542-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.2542.
PMID: 11331334BACKGROUNDBall IM, Seabrook J, Desai N, Allen L, Anderson S. Dilute proparacaine for the management of acute corneal injuries in the emergency department. CJEM. 2010 Sep;12(5):389-96. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012537.
PMID: 20880433BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian Ball, MD, MSc (Epi), FRCPC
London Health Sciences Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- All parties involved until the end of trial. Pharmacy will be the only unblinded party as they need to prepare the study drugs.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair, Critical Care Western Research and Scholar Program Director; Consultant, Critical Care Medicine; Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2018
First Posted
December 10, 2018
Study Start
June 6, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share