Study Stopped
LACK OF INTEREST
Continuous Erector Spinae Block Versus Continuous Paravertebral Block
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Overall Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous erector spinae block (ESB) versus continuous paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative analgesia in children and adolescents undergoing surgical procedures via unilateral thoracotomy. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that ESP block efficacy is not inferior to that of PVB with respect to pain control and consumed opiate equivalents at 24 hours postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 13, 2026
CompletedMay 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.8 years
November 16, 2018
March 30, 2026
May 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rescue Analgesic Consumption
rescue opiates (rendered as morphine equivalents/kg) given by blinded providers using standard PCA/NCA demand protocols
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
continuous erector spinae block
EXPERIMENTALAn erector spinae block is placed at end of the thoracotomy procedure, bolused with 1ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine, then started on a 0.2ml/kg/hour continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine. patients will have access to rescue opiates as needed by means of the standard PCA/NCA demand protocols utilized at BCH. Rescue analgesic consumption will be tabulated at 24, 48 and 72 hours, rendered as total opiate equivalents.
continuous paravertebral block
ACTIVE COMPARATORA paravertebral block is placed at end of the thoracotomy procedure, bolused with 1ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine, then started on a 0.2ml/kg/hour continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine. patients will have access to rescue opiates as needed by means of the standard PCA/NCA demand protocols utilized at BCH. Rescue analgesic consumption will be tabulated at 24, 48 and 72 hours, rendered as total opiate equivalents.
Interventions
Erector spinae block: T4/5 transverse process is identified with the ultrasound transducer in a parasagittal orientation; the needle tip is advanced until it contacts the transverse process, just below the erector spinae muscle complex; the erector spinae muscle is visualized to be elevated up off of the transverse process with normal saline injection. Following a bolus injection of 2ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine, a catheter is threaded into the space occupied by the local anesthetic bolus.
The paravertebral space (bound medially by the bodies of the vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and intervertebral foraminae; anterolaterally by the parietal pleura and the innermost intercostal membrane; posteriorly by the transverse processes of the thoracic vertebrae, heads of the ribs, and the superior costotransverse ligament) laying between T4/5 is identified using the ultrasound transducer in a transverse orientation; the needle tip is advanced until it is seen passing under the transverse process, immediately superior to the pleura; the pleura is seen to deflect downward with normal saline injection. Following a bolus injection of 2ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine, a catheter is threaded into the space occupied by the local anesthetic bolus.
Ropivacaine 0.2% will be the drug used for each group (ESB group and PVB group)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I - III status, undergoing unilateral thoracotomy for either esophageal atresia related intrathoracic procedures or other non-cardiac general surgical intrathoracic procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing procedures including pleurodesis, pleural stripping, and decortication or other procedures with widely distributed pleural disruption.
- Patients with severe neurodevelopmental delays.
- Patients with previous chronic pain syndromes.
- Patients with a history of opioid treatment at any point in the 2 months prior to surgery.
- Lack of parental consent and/or child assent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Boston Children"S Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roland Brusseau MD
- Organization
- Boston Children's Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ROLAND BRUSSEAU, MD
Boston Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate in Perioperative Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Instructor in Anaesthesia, Havard Medical School
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2018
First Posted
December 7, 2018
Study Start
April 16, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Results First Posted
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share