The Visceral Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block on postoperative visceral pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LLC). Given that rectus sheath block may provide sufficient somatic pain block, investigators aimed to investigate whether erector spinae block is effective in visceral pain block. After induction of general anesthesia, group of patient is decided randomly. In Group R, rectus sheath block is performed with 0.2% Ropivacaine 30ml before the operation. In Group RE, rectus sheath block and erector spinae plane block are performed with 0.2% ropivacaine 70ml before the operation. NRS score measurement and comparison of the rescue analgesic dose used at 0, 0.5, 1, 2,6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after arrival at the recovery room were collected
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedJuly 5, 2019
July 1, 2019
3 months
November 15, 2018
July 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference of analgesic consumption between both group
The difference in analgesics usage between the two groups after the operation is checked at fixed intervals (at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours after operation) to compare.
at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours after operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
compare the Numeric rating scale (NRS)
at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 9, 18, 24 hours after operation
Study Arms (2)
Group R : Rectus sheath block group
EXPERIMENTALultrasound guided Rectus sheath block with 0.2% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi) 30ml before surgical incision
Group RE: Rectus sheath block and erector spinae plane block
ACTIVE COMPARATORultrasound guided Rectus sheath block with 0.2% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi) 30ml before surgical incision and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 0.2% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi) 40ml
Interventions
Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block with 0.2% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi) 30ml around umbilicus
Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 0.2% ropivacaine (Fresenius Kabi) 40ml at T7 level
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults between the ages of 20 and 80
- scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy patient
- American society of anesthesiologists score 1 or 2
- Patients who have voluntarily agreed in writing to participate in the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with side effects on local anesthetics or steroids
- Patient who are taboo of peripheral nerve block such as blood clotting disorder, infection, etc.
- Patients with uncontrolled medical or psychiatric problem
- Patient does not agree to participate in the study
- Patients with deformity at vertebra or chest wall.
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Patients receiving a single laparoscopic cholecystectomy (including using a robot)
- Patients with severe intraperitoneal adhesion (higher than Nair s grade 3), or with external drain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, Songpa-gu, 05505, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
JongHyuk Lee, MD
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- clinical assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2018
First Posted
December 7, 2018
Study Start
December 17, 2018
Primary Completion
March 30, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07