Avoiding Health Disparities When Collecting Patient Contextual Data for Clinical Care and Pragmatic Research
1 other identifier
interventional
301
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To assess whether the routine collection of patient-contextual data improves patient activation and communication, and can mitigate racial disparities in communication and engagement, we are inviting patients who have upcoming appointments at the participating health system to participate in a communication study. Patients will be randomized to having guided (facilitated) enrollment in a tool that collects patient contextual data, or to usual care. All patients are invited directly by the health system to use the tool. Statistical methods will be used to determine the impact of the tool's use on outcomes of interest, as well as the impact on completion by the use of the facilitated enrollment. The study will particularly focus on assessing the impact of patient-contextual data and communication on heath disparities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
7 months
November 29, 2018
February 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Communication Score As Assessed by Communication Assessment Tool, a validated 14-item patient-reported outcome.
Use of Communication Assessment Tool (CAT), a 14-item instrument that reports patient-views of clinician communication Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67: 333-342.
Post Visit ( 1 week)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in the composite score of the patient activation measure, a validated instrument to assess a patient's engagement and activation in their health issues.
Pre/Post Visit (1 week)
Study Arms (2)
Facilitated Enrollment
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be aided in the account creation and usage of a consumer informatics tool to collect and report patient-contextual data within the electronic health record
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will be invited to use the patient contextual data tool as per usual care, but will not receive additional assistance in account creation and usage.
Interventions
Research coordinator will assist patients in account creation and usage of the tool.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18 or older
- able to speak and understand English,
- a patient at a selected Froedtert \& Medical College of Wisconson primary care or internal medicine clinic (i.e., General Internal Medicine On Campus of Milwaukee Regional Medical Center, Sargeant Health Center, or Tosa Health Center (Plank Road Clinic) with an upcoming (\> 4 weeks away) appointment and at least 1 previous appointment with the same provider in the previous 12 months.
- Patients with cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia) are eligible to participate through the use of proxies who would ordinarily accompany them to appointments and complete forms or post-visit surveys on their behalf.
You may not qualify if:
- Minors and non-English speaking patients are not eligible to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Related Publications (3)
Holt JM, Cusatis R, Winn A, Asan O, Spanbauer C, Williams JS, Flynn KE, Somai M, Talsma A, Laud P, Makoul G, Crotty BH. Impact of Pre-visit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Physician Communication and Patient Activation: a Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3321-3329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06583-7. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
PMID: 33559067DERIVEDHolt JM, Winn A, Cusatis R, Talsma A, Crotty BH. Racial Disparities in Patient Activation: The Role of Economic Diversity. West J Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;43(6):517-529. doi: 10.1177/0193945920963130. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
PMID: 33012264DERIVEDHolt JM, Cusatis R, Winn A, Asan O, Spanbauer C, Williams JS, Flynn KE, Somai M, Laud P, Crotty BH. The Impact of Previsit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Activation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 23;9(9):e20309. doi: 10.2196/20309.
PMID: 32965223DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bradley H Crotty, MD MPH
Medical College of Wisconsin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2018
First Posted
December 6, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02