NCT03765203

Brief Summary

Detecting allograft injury and rejection is critical to preventing graft loss. The current standard of care (SoC) relies on serum creatinine (SC) and biopsy to monitor for and identify kidney injury earlier. SC has poor specificity and sensitivity and response to rejection is often delayed. Protocol biopsy is more accurate but involves the risk of complications. A more definitive, less invasive method for monitoring injury and early rejection is needed. We report on the clinical utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in transplant recipients' blood, measured using a novel SNP-based mmPCR NGS methodology, to diagnose allograft injury/rejection. In this study, investigators will measure how use of dd-cfDNA changes clinical practice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
175

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2018

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 7, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 7, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

November 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnosis-Treatment

    Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's identification and treatment of hyperglycemia, as measured by the participants diagnostic and treatment CPV case domain scores. In each domain of a CPV (history, physical exam, workup, diagnosis and treatment), participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each domain.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Quality of Care: CPV scores

    3 months

  • Workup Costs

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control participants will care for the same set of CPV patients as the intervention arm, but will not have knowledge of or access to Natera's dd-cfDNA test results. Investigators will compare control participants' clinical recommendations to those in the intervention arm.

Other: Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention participants will care for the same set of CPV patients as the control arm, but will be educated on and given access to Natera's dd-cfDNA test results. Investigators will compare intervention participants' clinical recommendations to those in the control arm.

Diagnostic Test: Natera KidneyScanOther: Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes

Interventions

Natera KidneyScanDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Online educational materials on Natera Kidneyscan (dd-cfDNA) and sample test results for simulated patients

Intervention

Online renal allograft simulated patients

Also known as: CPVs
ControlIntervention

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A minimum of 2 years post-residency but no more than 40 years in practice
  • Board-certified in internal medicine
  • Completion of a nephrology fellowship
  • In a private solo or multi-group practice
  • Minimum threshold of 5 post-kidney transplant (KT) patients currently seen monthly
  • Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Not board certified in internal medicine
  • Have practiced as a board-certified physician for less than 2 or greater than 40 years
  • See \<5 post-transplant patients monthly
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to access the internet

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

QURE Healthcare

San Francisco, California, 94109, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • John W Peabody, MD PhD

    President

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a pre-post, two round controlled trial of care practices in a nationally representative sample of practicing nephrologists randomly assigned to a control or an intervention arm. All providers will be asked to propose care for a total of 6 CPV simulated patients who are adults aged 30-75; three or more months post-transplant; and presenting with signs, symptoms and laboratory findings suggestive of allograft rejection. Each assessment round will consist of 3 simulated patients. In between assessment rounds, physicians randomized into the intervention arm will receive educational materials on the new allograft rejection test.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
John W Peabody, MD PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2018

First Posted

December 5, 2018

Study Start

November 5, 2018

Primary Completion

January 7, 2019

Study Completion

January 7, 2019

Last Updated

September 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations