MAC vs TIVA Ambulatory Breast Augmentation
Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Remifentanil and Ketofol Results in a Superior Quality of Recovery Compared With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Ambulatory Breast Augmentation
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
hypothesis: the combination of LA with remifentanil and ketofol \[monitored anesthesia care (MAC)\] for ambulatory breast augmentation may result in results in better QoR on day of surgery as compared with total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) . The purpose of this study was to compare the QoR after MAC using remifentanil and ketofol with TIVA during ambulatory breast augmentation .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2018
CompletedDecember 5, 2018
December 1, 2018
3 years
December 1, 2018
December 4, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of recovery
Quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire, which includes five general quality of life dimensions: physical independence (5 items), pain (7 items), .emotional state (9 items), psychological support (7 items), and physical independence (5 items). Each item was graded with a 5-point score: none of the time, some of the time,usually, most of the time and all of the time. The total score on the QoR- 40 questionnaire ranges from 40 to 200 representing, respectively, extremely poor to excellent
24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Recovery room readiness times
24 hours postoperative
home readiness times
24 hours postoperative
adverse events
24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
remifentanil
ACTIVE COMPARATORMAC group
general anesthetic
ACTIVE COMPARATORTIVA group
Interventions
Five minutes before infiltration of the local anesthestic by the surgeon, patients received an initial maintenance infusion of remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min and ketofol mixture 0.3 ml/kg (propofol 25 µg /kg/min and ketamine 10 µg/kg/min). ketofol mixture was prepared in a ratio of 1:2.5 (100 mg ketamine 2 mL (100 mg), propofol 1% 25 mL (250 mg), and glucose 5% 23 ml, total volume of 50 ml, each ml contain 2 mg ketamine + 5 mg propofol). Throughout the surgery, titration of the infusion rate of the remifentanil and ketofol were indicated by vital signs and expression of pain
general anesthetic was induced with a bolus dose of remifentanil (1 ug/kg over 30 second) and propofol (2 mg/kg) followed by insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). After the induction of anaesthesia and securing the airway, patient' lungs were ventilated with volume controlled ventilation, 50% oxygen/air mixtures in a circle system. .Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil (0.5 ug/ kg/ min) and propofol (5 mg/kg/h). Remifentanil and propofol titrated to keep heart rate and the blood pressure within 20% of the baseline values and maintain BIS between 40 and 60, respectively. Patient movements were treated with additional i.v. bolus doses of remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I, II
You may not qualify if:
- ASA III
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lectrure of anesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2018
First Posted
December 5, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12