Efficacy and Safety of Rheosorbilact® Solution for Infusion, in a Complex Therapy of Sepsis.
Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, With Blind Assessor, Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Rheosorbilact®, Solution for Infusion, in Comparison With Ringer's Lactate, Solution for Infusion, in a Complex Therapy of Sepsis.
1 other identifier
interventional
180
5 countries
13
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Rheosorbilact®, solution for infusion ("Yuria-Pharm" LLC), in comparison with Ringer's Lactate, solution for infusion, in a complex therapy of sepsis. Half of participants will receive Rheosorbilact® in complex therapy, while the other half will receive Ringer's Lactate in complex therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 sepsis
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4 sepsis
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 11, 2019
CompletedFebruary 21, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 years
October 10, 2017
February 20, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A change in the total SOFA score vs. baseline score upon admission;
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is composed of scores of six organ systems: R-respiratory, C-cardiovascular, H-hepatic, Co-coagulation, Re-renal, and N-neurological graded from 0 to 4 according to the degree of dysfunction or failure. The SOFA score ranges from 0 to 24 points. We evaluate initial SOFA score and differences between subsequent scores (Δ-SOFA scores).
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
Secondary Outcomes (36)
A change in the total APACHE II score vs. baseline score upon admission;
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
A change in the total SAPS II score vs. baseline score upon admission
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
A change in the total MODS score vs. baseline score upon admission
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
Concentration of glucose
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
Concentration of sodium
Will be evaluated for the duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, at screening (Day 0) and Visit 3 (Day 3) of ICU stay.
- +31 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse events
Patients will be followed during 14 days.
Incidence of multiple organ failure
Patients will be followed during 14 days.
Overall survival (%) at follow-up visit.
Follow-up visit (Day 14±1)
Study Arms (2)
Rheosorbilact®
EXPERIMENTALRheosorbilact® is administered as a part of the infusion therapy intravenously (with speed 40-60 drip per minute) at a dose of 600 to 1,000 ml (10 to 15 ml/kg body weight per 24 hours).The period of the treatment with the study drug lasts 3 days.
Ringer's Lactate
ACTIVE COMPARATORRinger's Lactate is administered as a part of the infusion therapy intravenously (with speed 40-60 drip per minute) at a dose of 1,000 to 2,500 ml (15 to 40 ml/kg body weight per 24 hours).The period of the treatment with the active comparator lasts 3 days.
Interventions
Administered intravenously (with speed 40-60 drip per minute) at a dose of 600 to 1,000 ml (10 to 15 ml/kg body weight per 24 hours) for 3 days.
Administered intravenously (with speed 40-60 drip per minute) at a dose of 1,000 to 2,500 ml (15 to 40 ml/kg body weight per 24 hours) for 3 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female aged 18 to 60 years inclusive
- Sepsis diagnosed according to ACCP / SCCM criteria (no later than 24 hours from the time of diagnosis of sepsis to screening visit) (Annex 1: Sequence Diagnostic Criteria for SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS)
- Informed consent for participation in the study signed by subject's own hand.
- The baseline value of the SOFA scale ≥ 2 points.
- The presence of any of the criteria for severe sepsis by ACCP / SCCM (presence of signs of organ failure - Annex 1: criteria for diagnosis of sepsis SCCM / ESICM / ACCP / ATS / SIS)
- Individual intolerance of the components of the study drug and the comparator;
- Hypersensitivity to sodium lactate;
- Intravenous infusions of lactate- or sorbitol-containing products within 24 hours before enrollment;
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding;
- Severe renal dysfunction (creatinine is more than 300 μmol/l or estimated creatinine clearance is less than 30 ml/min);
- Metabolic alkalosis;
- Severe metabolic acidosis;
- Intracerebral hemorrhage;
- Any thromboembolism;
- Decompensated cardiovascular failure;
- +9 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Infusion of the study drug or the comparator is started more than 12 hours after randomization;
- Lack of data for sepsis (diagnosis not confirmed);
- Withdrawal of the informed consent by the subject;
- Investigator considers that the infusion therapy with either study drug or comparator may not be continued for safety reasons;
- Development of conditions that prevent further use of the study drug/comparator before efficacy evaluation visit (Visit 3);
- Subject needs concomitant therapy prohibited in the study before efficacy evaluation visit (Visit 3);
- Development of conditions (including serious adverse events) which make it impossible to evaluate the primary endpoint;
- Confirmation of pregnancy at any time of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yuria-Pharmlead
Study Sites (13)
"Unimedi Adjara" LLC
Batumi, Georgia
Kutaisi Referral Hospital
Kutaisi, Georgia
Hospital of the Medical Center of the Administration of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Astana, Kazakhstan
Institute of Ambulance
Chisinau, Moldova
Municipal Clinical Hospital "Sfinta Treime"
Chisinau, Moldova
Republican Clinical Hospital
Chisinau, Moldova
Dnipro's Medical Academy of Ministry of Health of Ukraine
Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine
Zaicev's Institute of general and urgent surgery NMA Ukraine
Kharkiv, 61018, Ukraine
Khmelnytskyi Regional Clinical Hospital
Khmelnytskyi, 29000, Ukraine
HSEE of Ukraine "Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy"; Poltava Central District Hospital
Poltava, Ukraine
Central District Clinical Hospital
Vinnitsa, 21029, Ukraine
Zaporizka Medical Academy of postgraduate education, Zaporizkyi Clinical Hospital N9
Zaporizhzhya, 69065, Ukraine
Republic Centre of Ambulance
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor will perform the assessment of primary, secondary efficasy and safety parameters
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2017
First Posted
December 4, 2018
Study Start
December 6, 2016
Primary Completion
December 11, 2019
Study Completion
December 11, 2019
Last Updated
February 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01