Study Stopped
No eligible patients could be recruited.
rTMS as an add-on Therapy in Patients With Post-stroke Depression
Investigation of the Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as an add-on Therapy in Patients With Post-stroke Depression (PSD)
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
About 50% of all stroke patients develop post-stroke depression (PSD). A meta-analysis has shown that rTMS treatment can reduce depressive symptoms in PSD patients. In addition to rTMS alone for the improvement of depression, the question arises as to whether a combination therapy of rTMS plus antidepressant medication can achieve a stronger or longer-term effect in PSD patients. Unfortunately, there are currently no trials of combination therapy with rTMS and drug therapy in PSD patients. Therefore, this study will investigate whether combination therapy of antidepressant and rTMS can provide additional relief of depressive symptoms compared to antidepressant and sham rTMS therapy. It is assumed that the additional active rTMS achieves a faster normalization of affect and drive than with a sham rTMS, so that the patients benefit from neurorehabilitation measures earlier and more sustainably.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedDecember 17, 2019
December 1, 2019
3.5 years
November 30, 2018
December 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D; 17 Item Version]
The primary endpoint is the change in the HAM-D score. A decrease of at least 50% from baseline on day 29 is considered clinically significant. From this, the responder rate is determined.
For the clinical assessment of the severity of depression, the HAM-D is collected at the following times: day -7; baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 2, day 8, day 15 and day 22).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
HAM-D score ≤8 Points
baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 22
HAM-D score (day -baseline)
baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 36
Study Arms (2)
active rTMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the intervetion group (active rTMS stimulation) receive active 10 Hz rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).
sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORPatients in the control group receive sham rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).
Interventions
The rTMS coil is applied tangentially to the head surface above the left DLPF (corresponding to position F3 of the international 10-20 system). For the stimulation intensity, the motor rest threshold of the patient is determined. The motor rest threshold is defined as the minimum intensity that triggers an EMG response with an amplitude\> 50 μV in the first right interosseus dorsalis muscle in at least 5 out of 10 cases. The stimulation intensity within the rTMS therapy is 80 percent of the motor rest threshold. In one session, 1,000 pulses are applied in 10 trains at a frequency of 10 Hz (1 train = 100 pulses in 10 s). Between the individual trains there is an inter-train interval of 28 seconds. The total duration of a session is 5:52 minutes. In total, the patient recieve 20 sessions.
Patients in the intervetion group (active rTMS stimulation) receive active 10 Hz rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- first insult
- Post-stroke Depression (17 item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale \[HAM-D\]\> 18 points)
- capacity to consent
You may not qualify if:
- insufficient cardiorespiratory stability
- previous depression or previous use of antidepressants
- pre-stroke psychological illnesses (eg psychosis, bipolar disorder)
- severe cognitive impairment
- aphasia
- lefthanded
- decreased seizure threshold or history of epileptic seizures
- taking medicines that lower the seizure threshold (local anesthetics, cortisone, alcohol, neuroleptics)
- hemorrhages and cerebral edema (e.g., subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma)
- fresh and healed head wounds near the area to be stimulated
- missing bone cover (relief spread)
- colonization with a germ requiring isolation (e.g., MRSA, 3MRGN, 4MRGN)
- recent myocardial infarction or higher grade cardiac arrhythmias
- contraindications to rTMS: Metallic or magnetic implants containing iron, cobalt or nickel (e.g., pacemakers, brain pacemakers, automatic insulin pumps, electrodes, plates, clips, implanted hearing aids, dental implants, metal endoprostheses, metal parts, or metal fragments in the body).
- pregnancy
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute for rehabilitative Research, BDH-Clinic Hessich Oldendorf
Hessisch Oldendorf, Lower Saxony, 31840, Germany
Related Publications (24)
Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe--a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;15(4):357-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012.
PMID: 15961293RESULTBarker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 2860322RESULTHausmann A, Weis C, Marksteiner J, Hinterhuber H, Humpel C. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances c-fos in the parietal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000 Mar 29;76(2):355-62. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00024-3.
PMID: 10762712RESULTMitchell PB, Loo CK. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 May;40(5):406-13. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01816.x.
PMID: 16683966RESULTMilev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J, Modirrousta M, Patry S, Vila-Rodriguez F, Lam RW, MacQueen GM, Parikh SV, Ravindran AV; CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):561-75. doi: 10.1177/0706743716660033. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PMID: 27486154RESULTSchutter DJ. Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):65-75. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003462. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
PMID: 18447962RESULTHorvath JC, Mathews J, Demitrack MA, Pascual-Leone A. The NeuroStar TMS device: conducting the FDA approved protocol for treatment of depression. J Vis Exp. 2010 Nov 12;(45):2345. doi: 10.3791/2345.
PMID: 21189465RESULTPrete G, Laeng B, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L. Right hemisphere or valence hypothesis, or both? The processing of hybrid faces in the intact and callosotomized brain. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PMID: 25575451RESULTBrennan S, McLoughlin DM, O'Connell R, Bogue J, O'Connor S, McHugh C, Glennon M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances emotion recognition in depressed patients and controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 May;39(4):384-395. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230595. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
PMID: 27662113RESULTZilverstand A, Parvaz MA, Goldstein RZ. Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review. Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
PMID: 27288319RESULTMondino M, Thiffault F, Fecteau S. Does non-invasive brain stimulation applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex non-specifically influence mood and emotional processing in healthy individuals? Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;9:399. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00399. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26528131RESULTAben I, Verhey F, Strik J, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. A comparative study into the one year cumulative incidence of depression after stroke and myocardial infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 May;74(5):581-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.5.581.
PMID: 12700297RESULTDeng L, Sun X, Qiu S, Xiong Y, Li Y, Wang L, Wei Q, Wang D, Liu M. Interventions for management of post-stroke depression: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 28;7(1):16466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16663-0.
PMID: 29184194RESULTRumi DO, Gattaz WF, Rigonatti SP, Rosa MA, Fregni F, Rosa MO, Mansur C, Myczkowski ML, Moreno RA, Marcolin MA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 15;57(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.029.
PMID: 15652875RESULTRossini D, Magri L, Lucca A, Giordani S, Smeraldi E, Zanardi R. Does rTMS hasten the response to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder? A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;66(12):1569-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1212.
PMID: 16401159RESULTAnderson IM, Delvai NA, Ashim B, Ashim S, Lewin C, Singh V, Sturman D, Strickland PL. Adjunctive fast repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;190:533-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.028019.
PMID: 17541116RESULTBretlau LG, Lunde M, Lindberg L, Unden M, Dissing S, Bech P. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008 Mar;41(2):41-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993210.
PMID: 18311683RESULTHuang ML, Xu Y, Hu JB, Zhou WH, Wei N, Hu SH, Qi HL, Luo BY. [Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with antidepressant medication in treatment of first-episode patients with major depression]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 May;40(3):286-90. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2011.03.010. Chinese.
PMID: 21671489RESULTWang YM, Li N, Yang LL, Song M, Shi L, Chen WH, Li SX, Wang XY, Lu L. Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
PMID: 28441583RESULTGarcia-Toro M, Pascual-Leone A, Romera M, Gonzalez A, Mico J, Ibarra O, Arnillas H, Capllonch I, Mayol A, Tormos JM. Prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add on treatment in depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;71(4):546-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.4.546.
PMID: 11561046RESULTHausmann A, Kemmler G, Walpoth M, Mechtcheriakov S, Kramer-Reinstadler K, Lechner T, Walch T, Deisenhammer EA, Kofler M, Rupp CI, Hinterhuber H, Conca A. No benefit derived from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: a prospective, single centre, randomised, double blind, sham controlled "add on" trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;75(2):320-2.
PMID: 14742619RESULTPoulet E, Brunelin J, Boeuve C, Lerond J, D'Amato T, Dalery J, Saoud M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not potentiate antidepressant treatment. Eur Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;19(6):382-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.06.021.
PMID: 15363481RESULTHerwig U, Fallgatter AJ, Hoppner J, Eschweiler GW, Kron M, Hajak G, Padberg F, Naderi-Heiden A, Abler B, Eichhammer P, Grossheinrich N, Hay B, Kammer T, Langguth B, Laske C, Plewnia C, Richter MM, Schulz M, Unterecker S, Zinke A, Spitzer M, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Antidepressant effects of augmentative transcranial magnetic stimulation: randomised multicentre trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;191:441-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.034371.
PMID: 17978325RESULTHuang ML, Luo BY, Hu JB, Wang SS, Zhou WH, Wei N, Hu SH, Xu Y. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with citalopram in young patients with first-episode major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;46(3):257-64. doi: 10.1177/0004867411433216. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
PMID: 22391283RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization of the patients is carried out by a non-medical employee. This co-worker maintains a randomly generated randomization list, indicating to the particular study code (e.g., TMS-PSD-001; TMS-PSD-002), whether to perform an active or sham treatment. The employee pulls a number from an envelope before beginning the intervention of each enrolled patient and then looks at the list to identify the particular group assignment. There will always be randomization packages of ten patients each. Once these are used up, a new list and a new envelope with study codes are prepared. In addition, the "real" and the placebo coils are coded before starting studies (eg "A" and "B"). Only the uninvolved employee is the assignment to the real - or placebo coil known. The uninvolved employee randomly assigns the study code containing the information on which coil to use ("A" or "B"). In this way a blinding of performing physician, patient and the evaluating scientist is guaranteed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postdoctoral Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2018
First Posted
December 3, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2021
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 17, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share