NCT03761303

Brief Summary

About 50% of all stroke patients develop post-stroke depression (PSD). A meta-analysis has shown that rTMS treatment can reduce depressive symptoms in PSD patients. In addition to rTMS alone for the improvement of depression, the question arises as to whether a combination therapy of rTMS plus antidepressant medication can achieve a stronger or longer-term effect in PSD patients. Unfortunately, there are currently no trials of combination therapy with rTMS and drug therapy in PSD patients. Therefore, this study will investigate whether combination therapy of antidepressant and rTMS can provide additional relief of depressive symptoms compared to antidepressant and sham rTMS therapy. It is assumed that the additional active rTMS achieves a faster normalization of affect and drive than with a sham rTMS, so that the patients benefit from neurorehabilitation measures earlier and more sustainably.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2018

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 3, 2018

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 17, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

rTMSEscitalopramadd-on therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D; 17 Item Version]

    The primary endpoint is the change in the HAM-D score. A decrease of at least 50% from baseline on day 29 is considered clinically significant. From this, the responder rate is determined.

    For the clinical assessment of the severity of depression, the HAM-D is collected at the following times: day -7; baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 2, day 8, day 15 and day 22).

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • HAM-D score ≤8 Points

    baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 22

  • HAM-D score (day -baseline)

    baseline (day 1 before rTMS stimulation); day 36

Study Arms (2)

active rTMS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the intervetion group (active rTMS stimulation) receive active 10 Hz rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).

Device: active rTMS

sham rTMS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Patients in the control group receive sham rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).

Device: sham rTMS

Interventions

The rTMS coil is applied tangentially to the head surface above the left DLPF (corresponding to position F3 of the international 10-20 system). For the stimulation intensity, the motor rest threshold of the patient is determined. The motor rest threshold is defined as the minimum intensity that triggers an EMG response with an amplitude\> 50 μV in the first right interosseus dorsalis muscle in at least 5 out of 10 cases. The stimulation intensity within the rTMS therapy is 80 percent of the motor rest threshold. In one session, 1,000 pulses are applied in 10 trains at a frequency of 10 Hz (1 train = 100 pulses in 10 s). Between the individual trains there is an inter-train interval of 28 seconds. The total duration of a session is 5:52 minutes. In total, the patient recieve 20 sessions.

active rTMS
sham rTMSDEVICE

Patients in the intervetion group (active rTMS stimulation) receive active 10 Hz rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions).

sham rTMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • first insult
  • Post-stroke Depression (17 item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale \[HAM-D\]\> 18 points)
  • capacity to consent

You may not qualify if:

  • insufficient cardiorespiratory stability
  • previous depression or previous use of antidepressants
  • pre-stroke psychological illnesses (eg psychosis, bipolar disorder)
  • severe cognitive impairment
  • aphasia
  • lefthanded
  • decreased seizure threshold or history of epileptic seizures
  • taking medicines that lower the seizure threshold (local anesthetics, cortisone, alcohol, neuroleptics)
  • hemorrhages and cerebral edema (e.g., subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma)
  • fresh and healed head wounds near the area to be stimulated
  • missing bone cover (relief spread)
  • colonization with a germ requiring isolation (e.g., MRSA, 3MRGN, 4MRGN)
  • recent myocardial infarction or higher grade cardiac arrhythmias
  • contraindications to rTMS: Metallic or magnetic implants containing iron, cobalt or nickel (e.g., pacemakers, brain pacemakers, automatic insulin pumps, electrodes, plates, clips, implanted hearing aids, dental implants, metal endoprostheses, metal parts, or metal fragments in the body).
  • pregnancy
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute for rehabilitative Research, BDH-Clinic Hessich Oldendorf

Hessisch Oldendorf, Lower Saxony, 31840, Germany

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Wittchen HU, Jacobi F. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe--a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;15(4):357-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012.

  • Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. No abstract available.

  • Hausmann A, Weis C, Marksteiner J, Hinterhuber H, Humpel C. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances c-fos in the parietal cortex and hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000 Mar 29;76(2):355-62. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00024-3.

  • Mitchell PB, Loo CK. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 May;40(5):406-13. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01816.x.

  • Milev RV, Giacobbe P, Kennedy SH, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J, Modirrousta M, Patry S, Vila-Rodriguez F, Lam RW, MacQueen GM, Parikh SV, Ravindran AV; CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):561-75. doi: 10.1177/0706743716660033. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

  • Schutter DJ. Antidepressant efficacy of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in double-blind sham-controlled designs: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2009 Jan;39(1):65-75. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003462. Epub 2008 Apr 30.

  • Horvath JC, Mathews J, Demitrack MA, Pascual-Leone A. The NeuroStar TMS device: conducting the FDA approved protocol for treatment of depression. J Vis Exp. 2010 Nov 12;(45):2345. doi: 10.3791/2345.

  • Prete G, Laeng B, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L. Right hemisphere or valence hypothesis, or both? The processing of hybrid faces in the intact and callosotomized brain. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

  • Brennan S, McLoughlin DM, O'Connell R, Bogue J, O'Connor S, McHugh C, Glennon M. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances emotion recognition in depressed patients and controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 May;39(4):384-395. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1230595. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

  • Zilverstand A, Parvaz MA, Goldstein RZ. Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review. Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

  • Mondino M, Thiffault F, Fecteau S. Does non-invasive brain stimulation applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex non-specifically influence mood and emotional processing in healthy individuals? Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;9:399. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00399. eCollection 2015.

  • Aben I, Verhey F, Strik J, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. A comparative study into the one year cumulative incidence of depression after stroke and myocardial infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 May;74(5):581-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.5.581.

  • Deng L, Sun X, Qiu S, Xiong Y, Li Y, Wang L, Wei Q, Wang D, Liu M. Interventions for management of post-stroke depression: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 28;7(1):16466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16663-0.

  • Rumi DO, Gattaz WF, Rigonatti SP, Rosa MA, Fregni F, Rosa MO, Mansur C, Myczkowski ML, Moreno RA, Marcolin MA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 15;57(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.029.

  • Rossini D, Magri L, Lucca A, Giordani S, Smeraldi E, Zanardi R. Does rTMS hasten the response to escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder? A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;66(12):1569-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1212.

  • Anderson IM, Delvai NA, Ashim B, Ashim S, Lewin C, Singh V, Sturman D, Strickland PL. Adjunctive fast repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;190:533-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.028019.

  • Bretlau LG, Lunde M, Lindberg L, Unden M, Dissing S, Bech P. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with escitalopram in patients with treatment-resistant major depression: a double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008 Mar;41(2):41-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993210.

  • Huang ML, Xu Y, Hu JB, Zhou WH, Wei N, Hu SH, Qi HL, Luo BY. [Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with antidepressant medication in treatment of first-episode patients with major depression]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 May;40(3):286-90. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2011.03.010. Chinese.

  • Wang YM, Li N, Yang LL, Song M, Shi L, Chen WH, Li SX, Wang XY, Lu L. Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

  • Garcia-Toro M, Pascual-Leone A, Romera M, Gonzalez A, Mico J, Ibarra O, Arnillas H, Capllonch I, Mayol A, Tormos JM. Prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add on treatment in depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;71(4):546-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.4.546.

  • Hausmann A, Kemmler G, Walpoth M, Mechtcheriakov S, Kramer-Reinstadler K, Lechner T, Walch T, Deisenhammer EA, Kofler M, Rupp CI, Hinterhuber H, Conca A. No benefit derived from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: a prospective, single centre, randomised, double blind, sham controlled "add on" trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;75(2):320-2.

  • Poulet E, Brunelin J, Boeuve C, Lerond J, D'Amato T, Dalery J, Saoud M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not potentiate antidepressant treatment. Eur Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;19(6):382-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.06.021.

  • Herwig U, Fallgatter AJ, Hoppner J, Eschweiler GW, Kron M, Hajak G, Padberg F, Naderi-Heiden A, Abler B, Eichhammer P, Grossheinrich N, Hay B, Kammer T, Langguth B, Laske C, Plewnia C, Richter MM, Schulz M, Unterecker S, Zinke A, Spitzer M, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Antidepressant effects of augmentative transcranial magnetic stimulation: randomised multicentre trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;191:441-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.034371.

  • Huang ML, Luo BY, Hu JB, Wang SS, Zhou WH, Wei N, Hu SH, Xu Y. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with citalopram in young patients with first-episode major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;46(3):257-64. doi: 10.1177/0004867411433216. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The randomization of the patients is carried out by a non-medical employee. This co-worker maintains a randomly generated randomization list, indicating to the particular study code (e.g., TMS-PSD-001; TMS-PSD-002), whether to perform an active or sham treatment. The employee pulls a number from an envelope before beginning the intervention of each enrolled patient and then looks at the list to identify the particular group assignment. There will always be randomization packages of ten patients each. Once these are used up, a new list and a new envelope with study codes are prepared. In addition, the "real" and the placebo coils are coded before starting studies (eg "A" and "B"). Only the uninvolved employee is the assignment to the real - or placebo coil known. The uninvolved employee randomly assigns the study code containing the information on which coil to use ("A" or "B"). In this way a blinding of performing physician, patient and the evaluating scientist is guaranteed.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: All patients will receive standard antidepressant therapy with 15 mg escitalopram (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor) per day during the study. The dose of escitalopram is increased in all included patients from 5mg/day (day 1-3), over 10mg/day (day 4-6) to 15mg/day (from day 7). Patients in the experimental group (active rTMS stimulation) receive active 10 Hz rTMS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over a period of 20 days, seven days a week (20 sessions). The comparison group receives a duration of equal long sham-stimulation. For transcranial magnetic stimulation, the Stimulator "PowerMAG Research 100" (Mag \& More, Munich, Germany) is used with a cooled double coil (PMD70-pCool).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Postdoctoral Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2018

First Posted

December 3, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion

November 1, 2021

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

December 17, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations