A Follow-up Comparison of Active Versus Passive Manual Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if there is any carry over difference between the type of education provided about common treatment techniques for patients with low back pain. This will be looked at right after treatment and when patients return on their second visit after they do a common exercise program for a few days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedApril 23, 2019
November 1, 2018
7 months
November 26, 2018
April 22, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Low Back Pain Rating
Numeric Pain Rating Scale for Back Pain (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain). The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the NPRS for low back pain is reported to be 2.0. LBP is reported to be 2.0.
Change from baseline to initial treatment
Low Back Pain Rating
Numeric Pain Rating Scale for Back Pain (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain). The minimal detectable change (MDC) for the NPRS for low back pain is reported to be 2.0.
Change from initial treatment to 2-4 days
Lumbar flexion
Active trunk forward flexion in cm (distance finger tips to floor)
Change from baseline to initial treatment
Lumbar flexion
Active trunk forward flexion in cm (distance finger tips to floor)
Change from initial treatment to 2-4 days
Straight Leg Raise
Neurodynamic Measurement of Leg Raise (lower limb tension test)
Change from baseline to initial treatment
Straight Leg Raise
Neurodynamic Measurement of Leg Raise (lower limb tension test)
Change from initial treatment to 2-4 days
Study Arms (2)
Passive treatment
SHAM COMPARATORPassive treatment will consist of Manual Therapy with biomechanical explanation of the technique.
Active Treatment
EXPERIMENTALActive treatment will consist of Manual Therapy with a neuroplasticity explanation of the technique.
Interventions
Patients will lie prone and receive lumbar Posterior to Anterior (AP) Pressure with a traditional biomechanical or anatomic explanation of the technique..
Patients will lie prone and receive lumbar Posterior to Anterior (PA) Pressure with a neuroplastic explanation of the technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults over the age of 18
- patients presenting at PT with a primary complaint of LBP
- LBP being present for 6 months or more
- fluent in English
- willing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- under age 18
- not able to read/understand the English language
- prisoners
- no medical issues precluding physical therapy treatment (red flags)
- no medical precautions to the use of manual therapy (metal, skin lesions, etc.)
- prior spine surgery
- unable to lay prone for the treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kevin Farrell
Davenport, Iowa, 52803, United States
Related Publications (2)
Louw A, Farrell K, Wettach L, Uhl J, Majkowski K, Wedling M. Immediate effects of sensory discrimination for chronic low back pain: a case series. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2015;43(2):58-63.
RESULTLouw A, Farrell K, Landers M, Barclay M, Goodman E, Gillund J, McCaffrey S, Timmerman L. The effect of manual therapy and neuroplasticity education on chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2017 Dec;25(5):227-234. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2016.1231860. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PMID: 29449764RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Farrell
St. Ambrose University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Chair of Clinical Residency Program in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2018
First Posted
November 29, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
April 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share