Randomized Trial :Hemorrhoidal Pedicle Ligation vs Laser vs Open Hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoidal Pedicle Ligation vs Laser Hemorrhoidectomy vs Open Hemorrhoidectomy: Randomized, Double Blind, Multicenter Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare three different modalities for treatment of symptomatic 2 ° to 3 ° haemorrhoids: open haemorrhoidectomy, intrahaemorrhoidal laser procedure and haemorrhoidal pedicle ligation. To assess early outcomes (after one week and one month) of the procedures: pain, bleeding, wound healing, return to work and quality of life; To assess late outcomes (after one year) of the procedures: late functional results (continence) and recurrence of symptoms and haemorrhoids. Study design This is a multi-center, double-blind, prospective RCT comparing three different modalities for treatment of symptomatic 2 ° to 3 ° haemorrhoids: open haemorrhoidectomy, intrahaemorrhoidal laser coagulation and haemorrhoidal artery ligation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2018
CompletedNovember 29, 2018
November 1, 2018
2 years
November 18, 2018
November 28, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Recurrence rate of rectal prolapse
Visual rectal prolapse during postoperative anoscopy requiring any kind of medical attention or treatment (visit to the doctor or pharmacy, medical, invasive or surgical treatment).
one years
Recurrence rate of rectal bleeding
Intensity and frequency of postoperative bleeding requiring any kind of medical attention or treatment (visit to the doctor or pharmacy, medical, invasive or surgical treatment).
one years
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Continence
after one year
Recurrence of any perianal symptoms
One years
Time to return to work
One years
Intensity and duration of postoperative perianal pain
7 postoperative days
Quality of life
One years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
open haemorrhoidectomy
OTHEROpen haemorrhoidectomy is performed using an anal retractor, exposed haemorrhoids at 3 - 7- 11 hours are excised using cautery. The arteries are ligated or cauterized. Open or closed technique is used (the choice of the surgeon). The Spongostan plug is then introduced
Haemorrhodal pedicle ligation
OTHERHaemorrhodal pedicle ligation is performed using operating proctoscope. The pedicle of symptomatic haemorrhoid is suture ligated with absorbable Vycril 2/0. Mucopexy is performed simultaneously if the prolapse is noticed. No tissue removal is performed
Intrahaemoroidal laser coagulation
OTHERIntrahaemoroidal laser coagulation is performed using disposable THD kit \[Biolitec Co\]. The haemorrhoidal pedicle is sutured. 1mm opening is created at the external haemorrhoid (skin level). Laser is then introduced up to pedicle and coagulation performed. This is repeated to all the piles. The procedure is finished with placing Spongostan plug into anal canal
Interventions
for treatment of symptomatic 2 to 3 degree haemorrhoids
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All consented \>18 year old male and female patients with 2 to 3 degree
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with 1st and 4th degree haemorrhoids.
- Patients with associated anorectal pathology (anorectal fistula, abscess, fissure, tumor or inflammatory bowel disease).
- Patients who had undergone previous anorectal surgery.
- ASA \> 3.
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vilnius Universitylead
- Biolitec Pharma Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Center of Abdominal Surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Lithuania, 2 Santariskiu Street,
Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2018
First Posted
November 29, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
2017