Pharmacological Modulation of Belief Salience
MOBS
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To provide an initial test of the hypothesis that dopamine mediates the motivational salience of stimuli beyond simple stimulus-reinforcement associations, the researchers propose to undertake a study of the modulation of a) levels of agreement or disagreement with; b) the perceived self- relevance; and c) the perceived interest of propositions expressing beliefs and values in healthy male volunteers using Ii) a dopamine antagonist (the D2-blocker haloperidol), and (ii) a dopamine precursor L-Dopa to increase CNS dopamine transmission. The researchers will also administer the Salience Attribution Task (SAT) which will allow researchers to assess reward-learning processing of simple stimuli using a reaction-time game. This task was utilised by Roiser et al in order to explore whether delusions in medicated patients with schizophrenia were related to impairments in associative learning. The authors hypothesised that associative learning was influenced by D2 receptor blockade. The researchers extend this approach to examine the effect of dopamine modulation on the SAT as a measure of associative learning, a basic neuropsychological process that may be involved in the attribution of salience to beliefs. Finally, the researchers will ask participants to perform a within-subjects dictator game to understand the influence of dopaminergic manipulation of the live attribution of harm intention to partners. The task has been previously validated online. Participants will play against 3 partners in a random order in each drug condition. Each partner will play the participant for 6 trials. One partner will always be fair, one will always be unfair, and one will be 50% unfair. We aim to understand whether potentiating dopamine has an additive effect on the harm intention attributions toward partners, regardless of the behaviour of the partner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 10, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.3 years
October 23, 2018
October 9, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Beliefs and Values Inventory (BVI)
Change in score between conditions on the BVI. Scores will be summed by item totals within theme (paranormal, religion, morality, politics, and science) and dimension (agreement, self-relevance, and interest).
12 Months
Salience Attribution Test (SAT)
Change in attribution of explicit and implicit salience between conditions on the SAT.
12 Months
Within-subjects dictator game
Participants will play against three different partners, each for six trials. In each trial, the player's partner will have the option to either split or take 10p from the player, so that the player either ends up with 5p or 0p. Players will play against one partner that will always split the money, one that will always take all of the money, and one that will 50% of the time split the money. After each trial, the player will be asked on a scale of 1-100 (1 being not at all and 100 being completely): 1. How much do you think your partner was driven by a desire to increase their own bonus, and 2. How much do you think your partner was driven by a desire to reduce your bonus. Total of a. and b. will be added up for each style of partner for each arm.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Big-5 Personality Questionnaire
6 Months
Brief Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Experiences and Feelings
6 Months
Study Arms (3)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo control
Haloperidol 3mg
EXPERIMENTALHaloperidol
L-Dopa 150 mg & Domperidone 10mg
EXPERIMENTALL-Dopa
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy males between the ages of 18-65
You may not qualify if:
- History or current psychiatric or neurological illness, history or current serious medical diagnosis, BMI outside of normal/healthy range, smoker over 5 cigarettes per day, recent use of drugs, non-english speaker.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King's College Londonlead
- Medical Research Councilcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences
London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Schmidt K, Roiser JP. Assessing the construct validity of aberrant salience. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Dec 23;3:58. doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.058.2009. eCollection 2009.
PMID: 20057930RESULTKapur S. Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):13-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13.
PMID: 12505794RESULTPessiglione M, Seymour B, Flandin G, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature. 2006 Aug 31;442(7106):1042-5. doi: 10.1038/nature05051. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
PMID: 16929307RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2018
First Posted
November 27, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Share anonymised data after collection on the Open Science Framework.