IDEAL: Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Study
IDEAL
1 other identifier
observational
1,293
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study aims to test the use of novel CT image analysis techniques to enable a better characterisation of small pulmonary nodules. The study will incorporate solid and predominantly solid nodules of 5-15 mm scanned using a variety of scanner types, imaging protocols and patient populations. The investigators hope that the new image processing techniques will improve the accuracy of lung nodule analysis which will in turn reduce the number of unnecessary investigations for benign nodules and may increase the accuracy of the early diagnosis of lung cancer in malignant nodules. This study aims to test this novel analysis software to subsequently allow validation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 27, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2022
CompletedJuly 29, 2022
July 1, 2022
3.6 years
August 15, 2018
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The overall diagnostic performance of a new computer aided prediction (CAP) model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules (% diagnostic accuracy).
Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC).
Up to 1 year.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The health economic benefits of the CAP model.
At 2 weeks, 3 months (group 2 & 3 only) and year 1.
The diagnostic performance of the CAP model for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules at a specific operating point relevant to clinical practice.
Up to 1 year.
Study Arms (3)
Group 1
On review of the scans by an expert, no further follow up or investigation is required, as the nodule(s) has been categorised as benign. As the patient was unaware the scan was being reviewed and no further investigations are required. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone).
Group 2
On review, the nodule is indeterminate and further scanning at a later date is required. The patient is informed of this, usually via a telephone call from either the doctor or nurse specialist working in the Lung Nodule Clinic (LNC) or site equivalent. This LNC is usually a virtual clinic - no physical interaction with the patient - and the follow up scan is reviewed and the patient contacted again via the virtual clinic. Patient is invited to take part in the study (by telephone, by post or in clinic if appropriate).
Group 3
On review, the nodule is regarded as potentially malignant and further scans and a clinic appointment is made for the patient. Patient is invited to take part in the study (in clinic if appropriate).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18 years old or older with CT scans reported as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm who meet the inclusion criteria and who can be placed into groups 1, 2 or 3.
You may qualify if:
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above
- CT scans identified as having pulmonary nodule(s) of 5-15mm
- Patients with solid or predominantly solid nodules referred to the pulmonary nodule clinic or for CT scan review by a specialist
- CT scan section thickness of 3mm and less
You may not qualify if:
- The CT scans are technically inadequate
- Having received treatment for cancer in the last 5 years
- Patient has more than five reported qualifying nodules
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oxfordlead
- Optellum Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (4)
Royal Berkshire Nhs Foundation Trust
Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5AN, United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals Nhs Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fergus Gleeson, Prof
University of Oxford/Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2018
First Posted
November 27, 2018
Study Start
August 29, 2018
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2022
Last Updated
July 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07