NCT03747432

Brief Summary

Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world, affecting 3,9% of population over 70 years of age. If untreated it carries a poor prognosis, leading to heart failure and death in 2 years after first symptom presentation. Treatment of choice for severe aortic stenosis is surgical aortic valve replacement. A new treatment option for severe aortic stenosis emerged in the last decade - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This minimally invasive method was formerly reserved for high risk patients deemed unfit for surgical aortic valve replacement. Increasing use throughout the developed world and recent studies have established TAVR as a safe and viable treatment option also for intermediate-risk patients. TAVR not only enables a less aggressive surgical approach, but also a less invasive type of anaesthesia. Anaesthesiologists are trying to modify the type of anaesthesia in the way of minimally invasive approach, aiming to improve the overall outcome. TAVR can be performed under general anaesthesia or procedural sedation (PS). From the start, TAVR was performed solely under general anaesthesia. Over time the procedure became routine and the anaesthesiologists started to commonly decide for PS. Many US and European retrospective studies have established PS to be a safe and compelling method of anaesthetic care for TAVR procedures with a favorable perioperative course, less complications, shorter intensive care unit and in-hospital stay and lower early mortality, when performed by an experienced anaesthesia team. There are many anaesthesia agents currently accepted for PS in everyday anaesthesia practice. Presently, reliable data from studies comparing different agents for PS for TAVR procedures is scarce. Most of it comes from retrospective nonrandomized trials. Propofol is a popular anaesthetic agent for PS. According to current studies, it is a safe anaesthetic agent with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles with quite low incidence of side effects. In recent years, dexmedetomidine has been commonly used for PS having analgesic properties inclusive of its anaesthetic properties. In addition, dexmedetomidine is associated with a lesser degree of respiratory depression as to other anaesthetic agents. Patient comfort is also believed to be improved with dexmedetomidine. Studies comparing outcomes of PS with propofol versus dexmedetomidine for different non-cardiac and interventional procedures showed benefits of dexmedetomidine, owing to its analgesic properties and preferable respiratory parameters. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR under PS with dexmedetomidine against those undergoing TAVR under PS with propofol. With the results the investigators aim to aid in defining the optimal anaesthetic agent for PS for TAVR and possibly other interventional cardiology procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2019

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementProcedural SedationPropofolDexmedetomidine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Effect of procedural sedation with propofol or dexmedetomidine on cognitive function of patients

    The investigators will perform cognitive function testing (Mini-Mental State Examination Test) one day before the procedure (baseline result) and 48 hours after the procedure (assesing change from baseline result)

    3 days

  • Effect of procedural sedation with propofol or dexmedetomidine on appearance of postoperative delirium

    The investigators will perform CAM-ICU delirium assesment method every 12 hours for 84 hours after the procedure, assesing appearance of postoperative delirium in the first 84 hours after the procedure

    84 hours

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Length of intensive care unit stay

    30 days after the TAVR procedure

  • Duration of in-hospital stay

    30 days after the TAVR procedure

Study Arms (2)

Propofol

EXPERIMENTAL

Procedural sedation with propofol during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: 0,5-2,5 mg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)

Drug: Propofol

Dexmedetomidine

EXPERIMENTAL

Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during the TAVR procedure (anticipated around 2 hours), dosage: bolus of 0,5 mcg/kg during 10 minutes, then continuous infusion of 0,2-1 mcg/kg/h for appropriate level of sedation - Ramsay sedation score 3-4)

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using propofol

Propofol

Procedural sedation during TAVR procedure using dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admission to University Medical Centre Ljubljana cardiology ward for TAVR using transfemoral approach
  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
  • Aged over 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Disagreement to participate in the study
  • Unable to voluntarily agree to participate in the study
  • Unable to participate in Mini-Mental State Examination
  • History of alcohol abuse
  • Diagnosed progressive dementia
  • History of cerebrovascular insult

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UMC Ljubljana

Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PropofolDexmedetomidine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2018

First Posted

November 20, 2018

Study Start

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion

June 30, 2021

Study Completion

June 30, 2021

Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations