Study Stopped
lack of enrollment
Early Closure Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anteriresection for Rectal Cancer
Early Closure of the Derivative Ileostomy Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer worldwide is the third most common in men and the second in female, although mortality is not as high as its incidence, there is less survival in developing countries. According to data from the World Health Organization, in 2012, there were an estimated 1.4 million cases and 693,900 deaths from this disease. Patients with rectal cancer are frequently taken to resection surgery as a curative management of their malignant pathology, according to the type of resection or reconstruction. In a high number of cases, they are management with colorectal anastomosis with a derivative ileostomy in the same procedure. The closure of this ileostomy is usually done after two to three months of the procedure, however in our environment it could take up to six or twelve months, during which time the patient is exposed to social difficulties, management problems and complications, derived from it. The early closure (7-12 days of its creation) of an ileostomy, despite the little evidence, seems to be a safe, feasible procedure that would save the patient having to live temporarily with an ileostomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 2, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.2 years
July 31, 2018
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
perioperative complications
To compare the frequency of perioperative complications and quality of life between early ( closure of the derivative ileostomy versus conventional closure in postoperative patients with low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Using the Clavien-Dindo classification (It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study. Complications that have the potential for long-lasting disability after patient's discharge (e.g.: paralysis of a voice cord after thyroid surgery) are highlighted in the present classification by a suffix ("d" for disability). This suffix indicates that a follow-up is required to comprehensively evaluate the outcome and related long-term quality of life)
6 yr
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The follow-up for describe complications
6 yr
Measure quality of life
6 yr
Study Arms (2)
Early closure of ileostomy
EXPERIMENTALEarly clousure of ileostomy before 30 days
Conventional closure of ileostomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional closure of ileostomy after 30 days
Interventions
Assigned interventions Conventional closure of ileostomy: Surgical closure of the protective ileostomy 90 or more days after the proctectomy surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years Diagnosis of Rectal cancer treated at the National Institute of Cancerology and any of the institutions attached to the study
You may not qualify if:
- Complications derived from the anterior resection of the rectum:
- Unresolved intestinal obstruction
- Sepsis
- Organ or space type operative site infection
- Hemodynamic inestability
- Need for reinterventions due to complications
- Coagulopathy
- Active bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000, Colombia
Clinica Vida
Medellín, Colombia
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
Medellín, Colombia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alexander Carreño, Md
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2018
First Posted
November 19, 2018
Study Start
September 5, 2018
Primary Completion
November 11, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09