Questionnaire and Radiography for Prosthesis Follow-up
Follow-up
Evaluation of a New Long-term Total Articular Prosthesis Follow-up Strategy by Simple Questionnaire and Radiography
2 other identifiers
observational
656
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ever-evolving prosthetic activity as described in a Swedish study that predicts 469 TKA per 10,000 inhabitants in 2130. Increased consultation of controls and post-arthroplasty follow-up is expected. There is a legal obligation to ensure long-term follow-up without official recommendation on follow-up procedures. The objective is to compare a consultation + Xray by the surgeon versus an Xray and a questionnaire completed by the patient who had a knee or hip replacement. This is to demonstrate the equivalence of both. All patients who come back for an annual check of a prosthesis should complete this questionnaire and perform an X-ray of their prosthesis. The study lasts one year and includes all the patients with a previous knee or hip arthroplasty. The result of the questionnaire and Xray will be compared to that of the consultation and Xray.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2019
CompletedApril 7, 2020
April 1, 2020
1 year
October 19, 2018
April 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 3 months
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 1year
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 3 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 5 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 10 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 15 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
at 20 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
economic impact (Number of working day)
at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Number of consultations)
at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Number of radiography)
at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Cost phone call)
at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
Evaluation of the feasibility of the questionnaire for detection of certain complications
at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
Study Arms (1)
Group 1
a new long-term total articular prosthesis follow-up strategy by simple questionnaire and radiography (questionnaire and Xray for all patients)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who have had a primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty that must be seen again in 2017
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have had a primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty that must be seen again in 2017. Normally at 3 months, 1 years, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have previous complications with their joint replacement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chu Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roger ERIVAN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2018
First Posted
November 19, 2018
Study Start
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
April 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04