NCT03740308

Brief Summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes of two full-coronal-coverage restorations (locally-made preformed Zirconia crowns \[LMP\] and NuSmile Zirconia crowns \[Nu/ZR\]) in treating carious primary teeth. Amongst the children attending the clinics of the Dental School at Damascus University, the ones having an indication for crowns restorations will be screened and if they are conformant to the inclusion criteria then they will be recruited until 60 teeth are reached (30 teeth for LMP/ZR restorations and 30 for Nu/ZR restorations).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 17, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

August 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Primary posterior teethzirconia crown

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes of crowns integrity

    Crowns integrity changes will be measured with the naked eye and the light cure device. The scores are as follows: (0 = No crack, No fracture, No chip) (1 = Chip) (2 = Crack) (3 = Fracture). (Cvar and Rygp 2005)

    Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes of gingival index

    Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

  • Changes of crown marginal adaptation

    Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Locally Made Zirconia Crowns

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One operator completes all the teeth preparing and restoring procedures. Local anesthesia is achieved using Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% with Epinephrine 1:100,000. The teeth are then isolated using a rubber dam. After caries excavation, the teeth are prepared according to manufacturer instructions.

Device: Locally Made Zirconia Crowns

ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns

EXPERIMENTAL

One operator completes all the teeth preparing and restoring procedures. Local anesthesia is achieved using Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% with Epinephrine 1:100,000. The teeth are then isolated using a rubber dam. After caries excavation, the teeth are prepared according to manufacturer instructions. (Same as Arm 1 Description)

Device: ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns

Interventions

Occlusal reduction by decreasing the occlusal surface to less than the natural occlusal profile by about 1-1.5 mm roughly. Proximal reduction by unfastening the interproximal contacts. The tooth should be trimmed down circumferentially by around 0.5-1.25 mm as needed. Subgingival reduction, leaving no undercuts or subgingival ridges, about 1-2 mm subgingivally on every area should be prepared. Completion of the preparation by eliminating sharp lines and pointed angles to allow all prepared areas to be marginally rounded and smoothed. Locally Made Zirconia Crowns are fixed using Glass Ionomer cement (Fuji- Jaban).

Locally Made Zirconia Crowns

Occlusal reduction by decreasing the occlusal surface to less than the natural occlusal profile by about 1-1.5 mm roughly. Proximal reduction by unfastening the interproximal contacts. The tooth should be trimmed down circumferentially by around 0.5-1.25 mm as needed. Subgingival reduction, leaving no undercuts or subgingival ridges, about 1-2 mm subgingivally on every area should be prepared. Completion of the preparation by eliminating sharp lines and pointed angles to allow all prepared areas to be marginally rounded and smoothed. ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns are fixed using Glass Ionomer cement (Fuji- Jaban).

ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients within the age group of 4 to 8 years of age.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene.
  • Healthy children, i.e. free of any systematic diseases or any developmental disturbances of the teeth and jaws
  • A minimal of two surfaces of caries in the targeted tooth
  • Corresponding treated teeth has not got any crown earlier
  • Patients with ECC as defined by the American Academy for Pediatric Dentistry.
  • Cooperative patients who have a dental behavioral assessment of "definitely positive" according to Frankl behavior classification scale.

You may not qualify if:

  • No patient is excluded by gender, race, or due to socio-economic backgrounds.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Damascus University

Damascus, 00963, Syria

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Aiem E, Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M. Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns: systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jul;27(4):273-282. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12260. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

  • Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):215-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z. No abstract available.

  • Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;21(7):445-8.

  • Sharaf AA, Farsi NM. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless steel crowns for primary molars. J Dent. 2004 Jan;32(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00136-2.

  • Mittal HC, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(5):345-52. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.345.

  • Croll TP, Helpin ML. Preformed resin-veneered stainless steel crowns for restoration of primary incisors. Quintessence Int. 1996 May;27(5):309-13.

  • Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):391-5.

Study Officials

  • Mohamed AlTinawi, PhD.

    Professor - Pediatric Dentistry Department - Faculty of Dentistry - Damascus University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double-blinded study (Patients blinding \& Outcome-assessor blinding).
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2018

First Posted

November 14, 2018

Study Start

May 17, 2018

Primary Completion

December 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The Individual participant data will be only available for the researchers in the department of Pedodontics, Damascus University

Locations