Computerized Cognitive Training in MS
1 other identifier
interventional
2
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
WHO: 40 participants with a confirmed diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) able to engage in moderate physical activity. WHY: The purpose of this study is to evaluate two computerized brain training tools, which include light physical activity, to see if they can help improve cognitive functions, such as memory and attention, for patients with MS. WHAT: Complete a set of tests (physical and cognitive) at baseline, wear a Fitbit Flex device at home for the duration of the study, 3 supervised sessions for 4 weeks at UCSF, one visit for physical and cognitive tests at one week after the final supervised session, and one final visit 6 months after the final supervised session. WHERE: 20 participants at the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA); 20 participants at Lausanne University Hospital (Rue du Bugnon 46, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2025
CompletedNovember 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
5.8 years
November 6, 2018
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in processing speed after 4 weeks of treatment with computerized gaming rehabilitation paired with physical activity 'Program 1', vs. 'Program 2'.
Processing speed is being measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score. SDMT measures the time to pair abstract symbols with specific numbers. The test requires visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and psychomotor speed. The score is the number of correctly coded items in 90 seconds. (max=110, min=0). Higher scores indicate improvement. Lower scores indicate worsening.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in attention after 4 weeks of treatment with computerized gaming rehabilitation paired with physical activity 'Program 1', vs. 'Program 2'.
4 weeks
Change in visual working memory after 4 weeks of computerized gaming rehabilitation paired with physical activity 'Program 1', vs. 'Program 2'.
4 weeks
Change in multitasking performance following 4 weeks of computerized paired with physical activity 'Program 1', vs. 'Program 2'.
4 weeks
Change in working memory following 4 weeks of computerized paired with physical activity 'Program 1', vs. 'Program 2'.
4 weeks
Other Outcomes (6)
Change in mood after 4 weeks treatment with Program 1 vs. Program 2.
4 weeks
Change in fatigue after 4 weeks treatment with Program 1 vs. Program 2.
4 weeks
Improvement in MS-related outcomes after 4 weeks treatment with Program 1 vs. Program 2.
4 weeks
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Program 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORComputerized gaming rehabilitation Program 1.
Program 2
PLACEBO COMPARATORComputerized gaming rehabilitation Program 2.
Interventions
Brain training games displayed on a large screen paired with physical exercise component. The program involves movements such as reaching, stepping, or stretching in place.
Brain training games displayed on a tablet device paired with physical exercise component. The program involves movements such as reaching, stepping, or stretching.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 60 years
- Presence of subjective cognitive complain from patient
- Objective general cognitive impairment: paper-and-pencil Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) z-score \< -0.5 at screening
You may not qualify if:
- Falls in the past 12 weeks as evaluated in the enrollment interview \[Hopkins Falls Grading Scale (Grade \>1)\]
- Strong risk of falling, assessed using the miniBEST (score\< 16)
- Psychiatric co-morbidity or anti-depressive or anxiolytic medication that has been changed over the 6 months preceding consideration for study enrollment
- Colorblindness
- Presence of clinically and/or radiologically confirmed relapses or disease progression in the past 12 weeks.
- Visual, mental, motor or brainstem Functional Systems Score (FSS) on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) superior to 2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV)
Lausanne, 1005, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Braverman ER, Chen TJ, Schoolfield J, Martinez-Pons M, Arcuri V, Varshavskiy M, Gordon CA, Mengucci J, Blum SH, Meshkin B, Downs BW, Blum K. Delayed P300 latency correlates with abnormal Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) in adults and predicts early cognitive decline in a clinical setting. Adv Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;23(4):582-600. doi: 10.1007/BF02850047.
PMID: 17050501BACKGROUNDForbes GB. Clinical utility of the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychol. 1998 Jun;54(4):461-76. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199806)54:43.0.co;2-q.
PMID: 9623751BACKGROUNDAnguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F, Janowich J, Kong E, Larraburo Y, Rolle C, Johnston E, Gazzaley A. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature. 2013 Sep 5;501(7465):97-101. doi: 10.1038/nature12486.
PMID: 24005416BACKGROUNDVogel EK, McCollough AW, Machizawa MG. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3. doi: 10.1038/nature04171.
PMID: 16306992BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Riley Bove, MD
University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arseny Sokolov, MD
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois, Lausanne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Study assessment administrator is blinded to what digital tool the subject has been assigned.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2018
First Posted
November 13, 2018
Study Start
April 25, 2019
Primary Completion
February 12, 2025
Study Completion
February 12, 2025
Last Updated
November 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share