Psychotropic Drug Use in the Elderly Living in Nursing Homes and the Influence of a Structured Drug Review
1 other identifier
interventional
224
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aim of this study is to explore if a structured drug review will change clinical symptoms and the psychotropic drugs prescription rate in the elderly living in nursing homes (participants of the study). The study will examine how training of nursing home physicians on reviewing prescription lists using the Norwegian general practice criteria - Nursing homes (NorGeP-NH) will influence the participants' clinical symptoms such as cognition, depression, anxiety and their quality of life. Secondary, we will analyse how a structured drug review will influence further psychotropic drug prescribing rates in nursing homes. The hypothesis for this study are:
- 1.Training of nursing home physicians on doing a systematic drug review will decrease the participants' clinical symptoms and improve their Quality of Life.
- 2.A systematic drug review will decrease the psychotropic drug prescription rates compared to before the drug review.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 7, 2019
CompletedFebruary 16, 2021
September 1, 2020
7 months
November 6, 2018
February 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Quality of Life: QUALID
Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) - Reporting the QoL of the patients on a scale from 11-55 where lower score indicates better QoL
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Number of drugs prescribed
8 weeks
Number of drugs prescribed
12 weeks
Depression
8 weeks
Depression
12 weeks
Depression
8 weeks
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NorGeP-NH
EXPERIMENTALInitially, a three hours lecture on dementia, depression, anxiety and psychosis on the elderly will be held. Both physicians working in the facilities and selected personnel, i.e. specialized nurses, will attend. Intervention: Drug reviews with NorGeP-NH Physicians in the intervention group will attend a 1-2 hours lecture about psychopharmacology and drug review. They will learn how to do drug reviews with the Norwegian general practice criteria - Nursing homes (NorGeP-NH) and they will do a structured drug review on the participants' drug charts.
Control nursing home
NO INTERVENTIONInitially, a three hours lecture on dementia, depression, anxiety and psychosis on the elderly will be held. Both physicians working in the facilities and selected personnel, i.e. specialized nurses, will attend. Physicians will not attend any lecture about drug reviews and they will keep treating participants "as usual".
Interventions
Physicians in the intervention group will attend a 1-2 hours lecture about psychopharmacology and drug review. They will learn how to do drug reviews with the Norwegian general practice criteria - Nursing homes (NorGeP-NH). The nursing home physicians will do the drug review on the participants' drug charts
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participant is living in a participating nursing home
- Expected stay for more than 12 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Severe somatic or psychiatric disease where the participant is too debilitated or not able to cooperate, or where the examination or assessment would cause a too big psychological and physical burden (i.e. severe psychotic state)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ostfold Hospital Trustlead
- Sykehuset Innlandet HFcollaborator
- The Dam Foundationcollaborator
- Norwegian Health Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Østfold Hospital Trust - Dept. of mental health
Grålum, 1714, Norway
Related Publications (2)
Nyborg G, Straand J, Klovning A, Brekke M. The Norwegian General Practice--Nursing Home criteria (NORGEP-NH) for potentially inappropriate medication use: A web-based Delphi study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015 Jun;33(2):134-41. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1041833. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
PMID: 26100966BACKGROUNDNyborg G, Brekke M, Straand J, Gjelstad S, Romoren M. Potentially inappropriate medication use in nursing homes: an observational study using the NORGEP-NH criteria. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0608-z.
PMID: 28927372BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sverre Bergh, MD, PhD
Innlandet Hospital Trust, Postboks 104, 2381 Brumunddal, Norway
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2018
First Posted
November 9, 2018
Study Start
November 12, 2018
Primary Completion
June 7, 2019
Study Completion
June 7, 2019
Last Updated
February 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after results publication.
- Access Criteria
- Because of the sensitive nature of the data, any access request will have to be submitted to the Central Contact Person and / or Central Contact Backup. After a preliminary review, the request will be forwarded to Regional committee for medical and health research ethics for approval.
Upon request, and after approval by the Regional committee for medical and health research ethics, IPD that underlie results in a publication might be shared.