Study Stopped
FDA approval not obtained.
Introducing CGM at Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis
Introducing Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology at Diagnosis in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Proof of Concept Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Diabetes technology is changing and has quickly become an integral part of diabetes care and management. The study team plans to study the effects of introducing technology to newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients. The investigators hypothesize that early access to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology will potentially improve satisfaction scores, hemoglobin A1c, glycemic control, reduce hypoglycemia, and ease the burden of disease when compared to new onset patients who receive standard of care access to CGM.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 21, 2019
November 1, 2019
6 months
November 6, 2018
November 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Parent version
Survey for Diabetes treatment satisfaction: 14 question survey with each question scaled from 0-6; with 0 being 'very dissatisfied' and 4 being 'very satisfied'
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Teen version
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
Change in Pediatric Quality of Life Survey- Parent and child versions
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
Change in Problem Areas in Diabetes survey
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
Change in Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - Parent and Child Versions
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
Change in Diabetes Distress Survey- Parent version
2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Number of flash glucose measurements at the intervention arm
3 months
Number of glucose measurements of the control arm
3 months
Percentage of glucose sensor readings within the range of 70 to 180 mg/dl
3 months
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Freestyle Libre Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFreestyle Libre Group: Participants will use the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system throughout the study for 2-3 months.
Control Group (standard diabetes care)
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will receive standard care. At the around 1 week and 2 month visits, control group subjects will use a blinded Freestyle Libre Pro to provide data that can be used to compare glucose variability between groups. The Libre sensor will allow the study team to measure glucose values but the subjects will not have access to this information for management/treatment decisions and usual diabetes care will be unaffected. The Freestyle Libre Pro last 14 days, can be activated in clinic, and the sensor can be returned in person or via mail where the investigators will download the data.
Interventions
The intervention arm of this study will begin using the Freestyle Libre glucose monitor within 2 weeks of their diabetes diagnosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
You may not qualify if:
- No diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (8)
Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2254-2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27634581BACKGROUNDJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):17-22. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1502. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
PMID: 19837791BACKGROUNDShapiro JB, Vesco AT, Weil LEG, Evans MA, Hood KK, Weissberg-Benchell J. Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes: Teen and Parent of Teen Versions. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;43(5):561-571. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx146.
PMID: 29267939BACKGROUNDBarnard K, Thomas S, Royle P, Noyes K, Waugh N. Fear of hypoglycaemia in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2010 Jul 15;10:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-50.
PMID: 20633252BACKGROUNDGonder-Frederick L, Nyer M, Shepard JA, Vajda K, Clarke W. Assessing fear of hypoglycemia in children with Type 1 diabetes and their parents. Diabetes Manag (Lond). 2011;1(6):627-639. doi: 10.2217/DMT.11.60.
PMID: 22180760BACKGROUNDPolonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, Jackson RA. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):626-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
PMID: 15735199BACKGROUNDVarni JW, Burwinkle TM, Jacobs JR, Gottschalk M, Kaufman F, Jones KL. The PedsQL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales and type 1 Diabetes Module. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):631-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.631.
PMID: 12610013BACKGROUNDMarkowitz JT, Volkening LK, Butler DA, Laffel LM. Youth-Perceived Burden of Type 1 Diabetes: Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey-Pediatric Version (PAID-Peds). J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 24;9(5):1080-5. doi: 10.1177/1932296815583506.
PMID: 25910541BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Hiers, MD
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 6, 2018
First Posted
November 8, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11