Retroflexion in the Entire Colon for the Detection of Colon-related Diseases
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Colorectal cancer is one of the common gastrointestinal malignancies, and the incidence of colorectal cancer in China increases by 3% to 4% annually . Colorectal adenoma is the most important precancerous lesion of colorectal cancer. Timely screening for colorectal adenoma and endoscopic resection is the most effective measure to prevent colorectal cancer .Removal of pre-malignant colon polyps during colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality by over 50%. However,Conventional colonoscopy endoscopy is a direct-view type, and the visual field is limited. About 10%-24% of the lesions may be missed. The ascending colon is more difficult because of the deep folds, and the rate of missed diagnosis is higher. Our goal is to determine if additional pre-cancerous colon polyps can be identified by looking at the total colon in retroflexion. During retroflexion the tip of the colonoscope is turned 180 degrees; allowing the doctor to view the backs of colonic folds. If additional polyps can be identified in this manner colonoscopy will become a more efficient method of screening for colon cancer. In order to evaluate how effective colon retroflexion is at detecting polyps in the total colon the investigators plan on performing a randomized, controlled trial. Patients undergoing screening or follow up colonoscopy will be invited to participate in the study. Those patients who agree to participate will be randomized into one of two groups once the colonoscope is fully inserted. Group one will have their colon examined for polyps with the endoscope looking forward (traditional form of examination) followed by repeat examination of the total colon with the colonoscope in retroflexion (looking backwards). In group two the colonoscopy will be completed in the usual manner. Polyps seen during each section of the exam will be recorded. The duration of each portion of colonoscopy will be recorded. After the procedure is completed the physician performing the colonoscopy will rate difficulty of the procedure and confidence with quality of the examination. Assess and record the degree of pain during and after the patient's examination.Pathology results for each polyp will be recorded once available. There will be no study related follow up after the pathology results are recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2019
CompletedNovember 8, 2018
November 1, 2018
12 months
October 31, 2018
November 7, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
per-patient adenoma and polyp detection rate
Patients were randomized to the exam of the proximal colon in forward or retroflexion view , and adenoma detection rates compared.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total procedure time
1 day
Rate of retroflexion-related adverse events.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient's feeling
In colonoscopy, at the end of the examination and 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours after the examination
Study Arms (2)
Retroflexion arm
EXPERIMENTALRetroflexion in the total colon and slow withdrawal to the rectum and record all visible colon polyps and other colon related diseases
Forward view arm
NO INTERVENTIONColonoscope is slowly withdrawn from the proximal colon to the the rectum have a forward view and record all visible colon polyps and other colon related diseases
Interventions
retroflexion in the cecum or proximal ascending colon and slow withdrawal to the rectum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \>18 years of age undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or routine polyp surveillance
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to intubate the cecum during colonoscope insertion
- Prior right colon resection
- Known polyposis syndrome or polyposis identified at colonoscopy
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Preparation of the colon is judged fair or poor using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
- Severe cardio-cerebral diseases
- Pregnant women, lactating women
- Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding
- Preoperative use of antispasmodic sedative drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The second affiliated hospital of xi'an jiaotong university
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710004, China
Related Publications (2)
Cohen J, Grunwald D, Grossberg LB, Sawhney MS. The Effect of Right Colon Retroflexion on Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;51(9):818-824. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000695.
PMID: 27683963RESULTKushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, Chen CH, Sayuk GS, Davidson N, Mullady D, Murad FM, Sharabash NM, Ruettgers E, Dassopoulos T, Easler JJ, Gyawali CP, Edmundowicz SA, Early DS. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;110(3):415-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.21. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
PMID: 25732415RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Baicang Zou, MD
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2018
First Posted
November 8, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2019
Study Completion
November 20, 2019
Last Updated
November 8, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share