NCT03735017

Brief Summary

This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two virtual reality treatments on neuropathic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 16, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 16, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 31, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual Reality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Pain Intensity as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity measured via 0-10 numeric rating scale. Range of scores: 0-10

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Neuropathic Pain Qualities as assessed by Neuropathic Pain Scale

    The Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) was designed to assess the distinct pain qualities associated with neuropathic pain.The NPS consists of 10 items. Seven of the 10 items contain the words intense, sharp, hot, dull, cold, and itchy to characterize the patient's pain and the word sensitive to describe the patient's pain reaction to light touch or clothing.One item describes the time quality of the pain (all the time or some of the time). The ninth item describes the overall unpleasantness of the pain, whereas the last item indicates the intensity of the deep and surface pain. In the NPS each item is rated separately. All the items are rated 0-10 scale, with higher score indicative of more neuropathic pain for each type of respective pain. Range of scores: 0-10 for each item.

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Neuropathic Pain Diagnosis as assessed by Doleur Neuropatique 4

    Doleur Neuropatique 4 is a 10 item survey that evaluates neuropathic pain following central and neurological lesions. It has components of how the pain feels to the patient (e.g. burning, cold, electrical shocks, tingling, hypoaesthesia). Responses to each item is yes or no, with each yes response equaling one point. Range of scores: 0-10. 4/10 and greater indicate neuropathic pain.

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Pain Interference specific to spinal cord injury as assessed by International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0

    Pain interference measured International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0 interference items. There are 3 pain interference items using a 0-10 numeric rating scale for each item. Items can be assessed by summing the score or by individual assessment of items. Summed range of scores: 0-30. Individual item range of scores: 0-10

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Pain Interference as assessed by Brief Pain Inventory

    Pain interference measured by Brief Pain Inventory interference items. 7 items each use a 0-10 scale. Item scores may be assessed individually, or by taking the average score of all items. Range of Scores: 0-10. Increased scores indicate higher levels of interference due to pain.

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Ease of Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire

    Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale

    Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory

    Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by Semi-structured Qualitative Interviewing

    Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • Quality of Life and Participation are assessed by the SF-36 Walk-Wheel

    Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Non-Interactive

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive non-interactive virtual reality walking sessions.

Other: Non-Interactive Virtual Reality Walking

Interactive

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive interactive virtual reality walking sessions.

Other: Interactive Virtual Reality Walking

Interventions

Individuals will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective. Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.

Non-Interactive

Individuals will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective. Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.

Interactive

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals with complete paraplegic spinal cord injury who report chronic neuropathic pain
  • Individuals with persistent spinal cord injury neuropathic pain
  • More than one - year post injury
  • Stable medication regimen for the past month

You may not qualify if:

  • Conditions that impair movement of the arms
  • Significant cognitive impairment as suggested by apparent incomprehension of screening questions as judged by the evaluator
  • For those for whom voluntary arm movement would cause sufficient discomfort (\>4/10) that could prevent trial completion will be excluded from participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Trost Z, Anam M, Seward J, Shum C, Rumble D, Sturgeon J, Mark V, Chen Y, Mitchell L, Cowan R, Perera R, Richardson E, Richards S, Gustin S. Immersive interactive virtual walking reduces neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: findings from a preliminary investigation of feasibility and clinical efficacy. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):350-361. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002348.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesNeuralgia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Zina Trost, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants and key research staff assessing outcomes will be blind to condition allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention arms. Both groups receive the same number of sessions, duration of sessions, and measures procured.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Posted

November 8, 2018

Study Start

June 16, 2018

Primary Completion

July 30, 2019

Study Completion

July 30, 2019

Last Updated

November 16, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Locations