Virtual Reality Walking for Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
Immersive Virtual Walking Treatment for Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of one of two virtual reality treatments on neuropathic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2019
CompletedNovember 16, 2021
November 1, 2021
1.1 years
October 31, 2018
November 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Pain Intensity as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) measures pain intensity measured via 0-10 numeric rating scale. Range of scores: 0-10
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Neuropathic Pain Qualities as assessed by Neuropathic Pain Scale
The Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) was designed to assess the distinct pain qualities associated with neuropathic pain.The NPS consists of 10 items. Seven of the 10 items contain the words intense, sharp, hot, dull, cold, and itchy to characterize the patient's pain and the word sensitive to describe the patient's pain reaction to light touch or clothing.One item describes the time quality of the pain (all the time or some of the time). The ninth item describes the overall unpleasantness of the pain, whereas the last item indicates the intensity of the deep and surface pain. In the NPS each item is rated separately. All the items are rated 0-10 scale, with higher score indicative of more neuropathic pain for each type of respective pain. Range of scores: 0-10 for each item.
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Neuropathic Pain Diagnosis as assessed by Doleur Neuropatique 4
Doleur Neuropatique 4 is a 10 item survey that evaluates neuropathic pain following central and neurological lesions. It has components of how the pain feels to the patient (e.g. burning, cold, electrical shocks, tingling, hypoaesthesia). Responses to each item is yes or no, with each yes response equaling one point. Range of scores: 0-10. 4/10 and greater indicate neuropathic pain.
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Pain Interference specific to spinal cord injury as assessed by International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0
Pain interference measured International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0 interference items. There are 3 pain interference items using a 0-10 numeric rating scale for each item. Items can be assessed by summing the score or by individual assessment of items. Summed range of scores: 0-30. Individual item range of scores: 0-10
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Pain Interference as assessed by Brief Pain Inventory
Pain interference measured by Brief Pain Inventory interference items. 7 items each use a 0-10 scale. Item scores may be assessed individually, or by taking the average score of all items. Range of Scores: 0-10. Increased scores indicate higher levels of interference due to pain.
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Ease of Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by the Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Patient Treatment Evaluation as assessed by Semi-structured Qualitative Interviewing
Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
Quality of Life and Participation are assessed by the SF-36 Walk-Wheel
Baseline - Final assessment (average 1 week post treatment)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Non-Interactive
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive non-interactive virtual reality walking sessions.
Interactive
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive interactive virtual reality walking sessions.
Interventions
Individuals will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective. Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.
Individuals will wear a head-mounted display to allow them to visualize virtual legs in the virtual environment. When wearing the display, individuals will see the legs and arms of their virtual avatar from a first-person perspective. Individuals will engage in virtual reality sessions in their home twice daily over the course of 10 days in a two-week period. Each daily session will take approximately 30 minutes, with 5-10 minutes dedicated to the virtual walking experience. Additionally, each daily session will be scheduled a minimum of 4 hours apart.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals with complete paraplegic spinal cord injury who report chronic neuropathic pain
- Individuals with persistent spinal cord injury neuropathic pain
- More than one - year post injury
- Stable medication regimen for the past month
You may not qualify if:
- Conditions that impair movement of the arms
- Significant cognitive impairment as suggested by apparent incomprehension of screening questions as judged by the evaluator
- For those for whom voluntary arm movement would cause sufficient discomfort (\>4/10) that could prevent trial completion will be excluded from participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Related Publications (1)
Trost Z, Anam M, Seward J, Shum C, Rumble D, Sturgeon J, Mark V, Chen Y, Mitchell L, Cowan R, Perera R, Richardson E, Richards S, Gustin S. Immersive interactive virtual walking reduces neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: findings from a preliminary investigation of feasibility and clinical efficacy. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):350-361. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002348.
PMID: 34407034DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zina Trost, PhD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and key research staff assessing outcomes will be blind to condition allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2018
First Posted
November 8, 2018
Study Start
June 16, 2018
Primary Completion
July 30, 2019
Study Completion
July 30, 2019
Last Updated
November 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11