Tisseel® as a Reinforcement of Esophagojejunal Anastomoses
The Use of Fibrin Glue Sealant (Tisseel®) as a Reinforcement of Esophagojejunal Anastomoses Will Decrease the Rate of Anastomotic Leak.
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The dehiscence of esophagojejunal anastomoses is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Any method of avoiding this problem will affect not only the postoperative course but also the prognostic of disease. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer. The rate of anastomosis leak will be measured with clinical, radiological and analytic parameters. Objective: Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® as a reinforcement in reducing the rate of anastomotic esophagojejunal anastomoses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 gastric-cancer
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for phase_4 gastric-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 23, 2020
July 1, 2020
12 months
October 18, 2018
July 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in immediate postoperative period
Clinical or radiological (see anex 1: Score Goense) evidence of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Amylases level in drainage
days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
CRP (C-reactive protein) in blood
days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Procalcitonin in blood
days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
White cell levels in blood
days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively
Results of Computed Tomography with oral contrast.
between 3th and 5th postoperative day
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tisseel®
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm "Tisseel®" surgeon dispenses the product all over the anastomosis. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual.
no Tisseel®
OTHEROnce the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm " noTisseel®" surgeon performs the surgical procedure as usual.
Interventions
Reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy with the product.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and scheduled for a total gastrectomy with curative intent in EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with non-epithelial neoplasms, with metastases, not resected or undergoing palliative resections. Patients who do not sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Elisenda Garsot Savall
Badalona, Barcelona, 08016, Spain
Related Publications (31)
Aurello P, Magistri P, D'Angelo F, Valabrega S, Sirimarco D, Tierno SM, Nava AK, Ramacciato G. Treatment of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage: a systematic review from the last two decades. Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):450-3.
PMID: 25975326BACKGROUNDMigita K, Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Enomoto K, Tanaka T, Ito M, Nakajima Y. Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1659-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1932-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
PMID: 22688419BACKGROUNDDe Stefano A, Bettarini F, Di Mare G, Neri A. [Enteric anastomosis and Tachosil(R)]. Minerva Chir. 2011 Jun;66(3):183-8. Italian.
PMID: 21666554BACKGROUNDYuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub2.
PMID: 23152259BACKGROUNDBorst HG, Haverich A, Walterbusch G, Maatz W. Fibrin adhesive: an important hemostatic adjunct in cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Oct;84(4):548-53.
PMID: 6981733BACKGROUNDKjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery--a review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(9):727-33. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80332-0.
PMID: 8905274BACKGROUNDMatthew TL, Spotnitz WD, Kron IL, Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Nolan SP. Four years' experience with fibrin sealant in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):40-3; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90080-p.
PMID: 2369228BACKGROUNDBonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG. Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1620-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8803-3. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
PMID: 15931477BACKGROUNDSilecchia G, Boru CE, Mouiel J, Rossi M, Anselmino M, Morino M, Toppino M, Gaspari A, Gentileschi P, Tacchino R, Basso N. The use of fibrin sealant to prevent major complications following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results of a multicenter, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2492-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9885-0. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
PMID: 18365278BACKGROUNDUpadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma S, Upadyaya A, Kumar V, Pandey A. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9244-7.
PMID: 17917772BACKGROUNDSaldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F, Prieto-Diaz-Chavez E, De Buen EP, Gonzalez-Mercado S, Alvarez-Villasenor AS, Prieto-Aldape MR, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9949-x.
PMID: 19234736BACKGROUNDFernandez Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A. Randomized trial of fibrin glue to seal mechanical oesophagojejunal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):40-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830111. No abstract available.
PMID: 8653358BACKGROUNDLago Oliver J, Arjona Medina I, Martin Garcia-Almenta E, Martin Gil J, Sanz Sanchez M, Perez Diaz MD, Alonso Poza A, Turegano Fuentes F, Torres Garcia A. [Use of fibrin based biological adhesives in the prevention of anastomotic leaks in the high risk digestive tract: preliminary results of the multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, and simple blind phase IV clinical trial: Protissucol001]. Cir Esp. 2012 Dec;90(10):647-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Spanish.
PMID: 22748849BACKGROUNDBruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1157-68. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x.
PMID: 11531861BACKGROUNDYoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40. doi: 10.1002/jso.22045. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
PMID: 21792945BACKGROUNDGarcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratala A, Garcia-Granero E. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):475-83. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826ce825.
PMID: 23478615BACKGROUNDGiaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Pirozzi F, Casagranda B, Giacca M, Corcione F, de Manzini N, Balducci G, Ramacciato G. Procalcitonin Reveals Early Dehiscence in Colorectal Surgery: The PREDICS Study. Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):967-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001365.
PMID: 26528879BACKGROUNDHayati F, Mohd Azman ZA, Nasuruddin DN, Mazlan L, Zakaria AD, Sagap I. Serum Procalcitonin Predicts Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jul 27;18(7):1821-1825. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1821.
PMID: 28749112BACKGROUNDNoble F, Curtis N, Harris S, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ; South Coast Cancer Collaboration-Oesophago-Gastric (SC-OG). Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1083-95. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1867-9. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PMID: 22419007BACKGROUNDDutta S, Fullarton GM, Forshaw MJ, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1002-1.
PMID: 21350898BACKGROUNDHoeboer SH, Groeneveld AB, Engels N, van Genderen M, Wijnhoven BP, van Bommel J. Rising C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels precede early complications after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):613-24. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2745-z. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
PMID: 25663633BACKGROUNDReid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S, Barnett M, Maupin G, Bassi C, Traverso LW; Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1451-8; discussion 1459. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
PMID: 17710506BACKGROUNDPerry Y, Towe CW, Kwong J, Ho VP, Linden PA. Serial Drain Amylase Can Accurately Detect Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy and May Facilitate Early Discharge. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.092. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PMID: 26319485BACKGROUNDBaker EH, Hill JS, Reames MK, Symanowski J, Hurley SC, Salo JC. Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Apr;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.074.
PMID: 27034784BACKGROUNDBerkelmans GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Smeets BJ, Weijs TJ, Silva Corten LC, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9118-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9118.
PMID: 26290638BACKGROUNDMaher JW, Bakhos W, Nahmias N, Wolfe LG, Meador JG, Baugh N, Kellum JM. Drain amylase levels are an adjunct in detection of gastrojejunostomy leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May;208(5):881-4; discussion 885-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.022. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
PMID: 19476853BACKGROUNDSano T, Sasako M, Katai H, Maruyama K. Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Sep;84(9):1310-2.
PMID: 9313722BACKGROUNDCools-Lartigue J, Andalib A, Abo-Alsaud A, Gowing S, Nguyen M, Mulder D, Ferri L. Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2573-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3654-1. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
PMID: 24682648BACKGROUNDStruecker B, Chopra S, Heilmann AC, Spenke J, Denecke C, Sauer IM, Bahra M, Pratschke J, Andreou A, Biebl M. Routine Radiologic Contrast Agent Examination After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Not Useful. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):801-806. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3384-3. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28205124BACKGROUNDStrauss C, Mal F, Perniceni T, Bouzar N, Lenoir S, Gayet B, Palau R. Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):647-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c1aeb8.
PMID: 19864934BACKGROUNDJones CM, Clarke B, Heah R, Griffiths EA. Should routine assessment of anastomotic integrity be undertaken using radiological contrast swallow after oesophagectomy with intra-thoracic anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.076. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
PMID: 26166736BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisenda Garsot
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients won't know if his anastomoses has been reinforced with Tisseel®.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2018
First Posted
November 7, 2018
Study Start
July 21, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07