NCT03733639

Brief Summary

Background: The dehiscence of esophagojejunal anastomoses is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Any method of avoiding this problem will affect not only the postoperative course but also the prognostic of disease. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized and multicenter trial, within the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group, to investigate the efficacy of Tisseel® in reducing the rate of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage in patients with gastric cancer. The rate of anastomosis leak will be measured with clinical, radiological and analytic parameters. Objective: Analyze the efficacy of Tisseel® as a reinforcement in reducing the rate of anastomotic esophagojejunal anastomoses.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
146

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 gastric-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Typical duration for phase_4 gastric-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2018

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 21, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 23, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in immediate postoperative period

    Clinical or radiological (see anex 1: Score Goense) evidence of esophagojejunal anastomotic leak.

    7 days

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Amylases level in drainage

    days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively

  • CRP (C-reactive protein) in blood

    days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively

  • Procalcitonin in blood

    days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively

  • White cell levels in blood

    days 1,3,5,7 postoperatively

  • Results of Computed Tomography with oral contrast.

    between 3th and 5th postoperative day

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Tisseel®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm "Tisseel®" surgeon dispenses the product all over the anastomosis. The rest of the surgical procedure is as usual.

Drug: Tisseel

no Tisseel®

OTHER

Once the esophagojejunal anastomosis is done the patient is randomized (Tisseel® vs no product). In the arm " noTisseel®" surgeon performs the surgical procedure as usual.

Device: No Tisseel

Interventions

Reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy with the product.

Tisseel®

No reinforcement of esophagojejunal anastomoses after total gastrectomy

no Tisseel®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over 18 years diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and scheduled for a total gastrectomy with curative intent in EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Group who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with non-epithelial neoplasms, with metastases, not resected or undergoing palliative resections. Patients who do not sign informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Elisenda Garsot Savall

Badalona, Barcelona, 08016, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (31)

  • Aurello P, Magistri P, D'Angelo F, Valabrega S, Sirimarco D, Tierno SM, Nava AK, Ramacciato G. Treatment of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage: a systematic review from the last two decades. Am Surg. 2015 May;81(5):450-3.

    PMID: 25975326BACKGROUND
  • Migita K, Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Enomoto K, Tanaka T, Ito M, Nakajima Y. Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1659-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1932-4. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

    PMID: 22688419BACKGROUND
  • De Stefano A, Bettarini F, Di Mare G, Neri A. [Enteric anastomosis and Tachosil(R)]. Minerva Chir. 2011 Jun;66(3):183-8. Italian.

    PMID: 21666554BACKGROUND
  • Yuan Y, Zeng X, Hu Y, Xie T, Zhao Y. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub2.

    PMID: 23152259BACKGROUND
  • Borst HG, Haverich A, Walterbusch G, Maatz W. Fibrin adhesive: an important hemostatic adjunct in cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Oct;84(4):548-53.

    PMID: 6981733BACKGROUND
  • Kjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery--a review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(9):727-33. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(96)80332-0.

    PMID: 8905274BACKGROUND
  • Matthew TL, Spotnitz WD, Kron IL, Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Nolan SP. Four years' experience with fibrin sealant in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jul;50(1):40-3; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90080-p.

    PMID: 2369228BACKGROUND
  • Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, Schauer PR, Hamad GG. Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc. 2004 Nov;18(11):1620-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8803-3. Epub 2004 Oct 11.

    PMID: 15931477BACKGROUND
  • Silecchia G, Boru CE, Mouiel J, Rossi M, Anselmino M, Morino M, Toppino M, Gaspari A, Gentileschi P, Tacchino R, Basso N. The use of fibrin sealant to prevent major complications following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results of a multicenter, randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2492-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9885-0. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

    PMID: 18365278BACKGROUND
  • Upadhyaya VD, Gopal SC, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma S, Upadyaya A, Kumar V, Pandey A. Role of fibrin glue as a sealant to esophageal anastomosis in cases of congenital esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2412-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9244-7.

    PMID: 17917772BACKGROUND
  • Saldana-Cortes JA, Larios-Arceo F, Prieto-Diaz-Chavez E, De Buen EP, Gonzalez-Mercado S, Alvarez-Villasenor AS, Prieto-Aldape MR, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Role of fibrin glue in the prevention of cervical leakage and strictures after esophageal reconstruction of caustic injury. World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9949-x.

    PMID: 19234736BACKGROUND
  • Fernandez Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A. Randomized trial of fibrin glue to seal mechanical oesophagojejunal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1996 Jan;83(1):40-1. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830111. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8653358BACKGROUND
  • Lago Oliver J, Arjona Medina I, Martin Garcia-Almenta E, Martin Gil J, Sanz Sanchez M, Perez Diaz MD, Alonso Poza A, Turegano Fuentes F, Torres Garcia A. [Use of fibrin based biological adhesives in the prevention of anastomotic leaks in the high risk digestive tract: preliminary results of the multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, and simple blind phase IV clinical trial: Protissucol001]. Cir Esp. 2012 Dec;90(10):647-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Spanish.

    PMID: 22748849BACKGROUND
  • Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1157-68. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01829.x.

    PMID: 11531861BACKGROUND
  • Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):734-40. doi: 10.1002/jso.22045. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

    PMID: 21792945BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratala A, Garcia-Granero E. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):475-83. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826ce825.

    PMID: 23478615BACKGROUND
  • Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Pirozzi F, Casagranda B, Giacca M, Corcione F, de Manzini N, Balducci G, Ramacciato G. Procalcitonin Reveals Early Dehiscence in Colorectal Surgery: The PREDICS Study. Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):967-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001365.

    PMID: 26528879BACKGROUND
  • Hayati F, Mohd Azman ZA, Nasuruddin DN, Mazlan L, Zakaria AD, Sagap I. Serum Procalcitonin Predicts Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jul 27;18(7):1821-1825. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1821.

    PMID: 28749112BACKGROUND
  • Noble F, Curtis N, Harris S, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ; South Coast Cancer Collaboration-Oesophago-Gastric (SC-OG). Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1083-95. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1867-9. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PMID: 22419007BACKGROUND
  • Dutta S, Fullarton GM, Forshaw MJ, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J Surg. 2011 May;35(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1002-1.

    PMID: 21350898BACKGROUND
  • Hoeboer SH, Groeneveld AB, Engels N, van Genderen M, Wijnhoven BP, van Bommel J. Rising C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels precede early complications after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):613-24. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2745-z. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

    PMID: 25663633BACKGROUND
  • Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S, Barnett M, Maupin G, Bassi C, Traverso LW; Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1451-8; discussion 1459. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0270-4. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

    PMID: 17710506BACKGROUND
  • Perry Y, Towe CW, Kwong J, Ho VP, Linden PA. Serial Drain Amylase Can Accurately Detect Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy and May Facilitate Early Discharge. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.092. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

    PMID: 26319485BACKGROUND
  • Baker EH, Hill JS, Reames MK, Symanowski J, Hurley SC, Salo JC. Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Apr;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.074.

    PMID: 27034784BACKGROUND
  • Berkelmans GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Smeets BJ, Weijs TJ, Silva Corten LC, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD. Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9118-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9118.

    PMID: 26290638BACKGROUND
  • Maher JW, Bakhos W, Nahmias N, Wolfe LG, Meador JG, Baugh N, Kellum JM. Drain amylase levels are an adjunct in detection of gastrojejunostomy leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 May;208(5):881-4; discussion 885-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.022. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

    PMID: 19476853BACKGROUND
  • Sano T, Sasako M, Katai H, Maruyama K. Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Sep;84(9):1310-2.

    PMID: 9313722BACKGROUND
  • Cools-Lartigue J, Andalib A, Abo-Alsaud A, Gowing S, Nguyen M, Mulder D, Ferri L. Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2573-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3654-1. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

    PMID: 24682648BACKGROUND
  • Struecker B, Chopra S, Heilmann AC, Spenke J, Denecke C, Sauer IM, Bahra M, Pratschke J, Andreou A, Biebl M. Routine Radiologic Contrast Agent Examination After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Is Not Useful. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):801-806. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3384-3. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

    PMID: 28205124BACKGROUND
  • Strauss C, Mal F, Perniceni T, Bouzar N, Lenoir S, Gayet B, Palau R. Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients. Ann Surg. 2010 Apr;251(4):647-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c1aeb8.

    PMID: 19864934BACKGROUND
  • Jones CM, Clarke B, Heah R, Griffiths EA. Should routine assessment of anastomotic integrity be undertaken using radiological contrast swallow after oesophagectomy with intra-thoracic anastomosis? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.076. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

    PMID: 26166736BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach NeoplasmsAnastomotic Leak

Interventions

Fibrin Tissue Adhesive

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FibrinBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Elisenda Garsot

    Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Elisenda Garsot

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Patients won't know if his anastomoses has been reinforced with Tisseel®.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2018

First Posted

November 7, 2018

Study Start

July 21, 2020

Primary Completion

July 1, 2021

Study Completion

July 1, 2022

Last Updated

July 23, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations