Development of an IDEAL Framework to Standardise Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
IDEAL-PM
2 other identifiers
observational
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Cytoreduction surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intra-operative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a relatively new treatment for selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (PMCR). Data from outside of trials suggest that CRS and HIPEC improves survival compared with the current standard care (chemotherapy). The big challenge is to do trials in this setting - as the intervention is complex, and there are wide variations in the process and recording of outcomes. If trials can confirm the findings from non-randomised studies there are an estimated 1000 to 2000 patients who may benefit from this intervention in the UK each year. The aim of this study is to develop a framework which can be used to undertake a randomised trial in patients with PMCR suitable for CRS with or without HIPEC. The investigators will address this using the principles of the IDEAL (Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment \& Long term study) framework. Here, a pre-trial feasibility study will be performed between the two national peritoneal tumour treatment centres (Manchester and Basingstoke). This study is designed as such that it will take place over the following four stages: Stage 1. Comparing the treatment data from 100 operations from each of the two centres to identify which of the key components of the intervention differ as well as testing for differences in overall survival and recurrence free survival. Stage 2. Identifying sources of these differences by selecting up to 25 patients and investigating the variation in the way surgeons score key aspects of the procedure Stage 3. Development of a 'trial manual' with standardised definitions (to minimise any differences) Stage 4. Test how well people follow the manual in practice. After this study is complete, it will be possible to use the resulting trial manual to design future randomised trials to test the most suitable clinical question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2016
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2019
CompletedNovember 29, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.3 years
November 5, 2018
November 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) Score
This scale measures the extent of peritoneal cancer throughout the peritoneal cavity. The range of this scale is from 0 to 39. 0 = no disease within the peritoneal cavity 0-9 = minimal disease 10-29 = moderate disease 30-39 = extensive disease Lower values are considered a better outcome for the patient.
At time of procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Completeness of Cytoreduction (CC) Score
At time of procedure
Overall Survival
3 years after procedure
Recurrence Free Survival
3 years after procedure
Study Arms (2)
The Christie NHS FT
Patients treated by Cytoreduction and Heated Intraperitoneal Surgery at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (one of the two initial, primary treatment centres) for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis.
Hampshire Hospitals NHS FT
Patients treated by Cytoreduction and Heated Intraperitoneal Surgery at Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (one of the two initial, primary treatment centres) for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastasis.
Interventions
Cytoreductive Surgery is a procedure that aims for the complete removal of all visible tumours affecting the protective lining of the abdomen. After the surgical procedure is completed, the surgeon introduces a heated, sterile solution mixed with chemotherapy drugs into the abdominal cavity (the HIPEC).
Eligibility Criteria
200 eligible patients identified from prospective databases located at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. The first 100 eligible patients from each of these databases who received CRS \& HIPEC for PMCR from the 1st of January 2010 will be selected.
You may qualify if:
- Over the age of 18
- Diagnosed with histologically proven peritoneal metastasis of colorectal origin
- Undergone Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC at either The Christie NHS Foundation Trust or Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
- Able to give informed consent
- Treatment with curative intent
- No diagnosed distant metastasis
You may not qualify if:
- Under the age of 18
- Palliative patients
- Diagnosed distant metastasis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Manchesterlead
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- University Hospital Birminghamcollaborator
- Bowel Disease Research Foundation (BDRF)collaborator
Related Publications (4)
NICE. Cytoreduction surgery followed by hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. IPG331. 2010.
BACKGROUNDMcCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J; Balliol Collaboration; Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
PMID: 19782876RESULTVerwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Sloothen GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder FA. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3737-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187.
PMID: 14551293RESULTBlazeby JM, Blencowe NS, Titcomb DR, Metcalfe C, Hollowood AD, Barham CP. Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):544-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7387. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
PMID: 21246515RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Andrew G Renehan, PhD
The University of Manchester
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Associate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2018
First Posted
November 7, 2018
Study Start
March 10, 2016
Primary Completion
July 5, 2019
Study Completion
November 30, 2019
Last Updated
November 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11