Efficacy of Non-animal Chondroitin Sulphate for Overweight Subjects With Knee Ostoarthritis.
NACSKO
Efficacy and Safety of Non-animal Chondroitin Sulphate Supplementation in the Treatment of Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis in a Group of Overweight Subjects: a Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is predicted to become the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide by 2020. and is estimated to affect more than 40 million people in Europe and 4 million people in Italy. OA has multifactorial etiology and obesity is one of the most important risk factor for knee Regarding therapy of OA in 2014, the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) published a treatment algorithm for the management of knee OA. In Step 1 of the treatment, it is recommended to initiate therapy with chronic symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs). Among SYSADOAs, the evidence is greatest for the effect of chondroitin sulfate (CS). Sixty overweight subjects with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were recruited and randomly allocated to a group of treatment with 600 mg/d of non-animal Chondroitin sulphate (CS) or to a placebo group. These measurements were considered: Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring (TLKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain were analyzed at time 0 and at 4 and 12 weeks. Health-related quality of life by ShortForm36, inflammation by C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) were also evaluated, together with a body composition assessment performed by DXA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 knee-osteoarthritis
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedNovember 6, 2018
November 1, 2018
1.5 years
October 31, 2018
November 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Generic Pain (VAS)
Pain intensity measured both at motion and at rest, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS measures a characteristic or attitude ranging across a continuum of values and cannot be directly measured. For example, the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. The results are showed with a scale 0-10. 0 means no pain and 10 high pain. A VAS reduction is expected only in treatment group.
0, 30, 90 days
Change in Knee Pain (WOMAC)
Assessment of knee pain by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis) Index. The WOMAC pain scale consists of five questions that assess pain while walking on a flat surface, going up or down stairs, in bed at night, sitting or lying, and standing upright. The responses are recorded on a five-point Likert scale, with a higher score representing a greater level of pain. This scale is valid and reliable in hip and knee OA populations. A significant decrease in expected in treatment group.
0, 30, 90 days
Change in Knee Functionality (TLKS)
Tegner Lysholm Knee function Scoring (TLKS). Each patient completed a self-report questionnaire, TLKS, related to knee symptoms and function. It includes eight items: Limp, Support, Locking, Instability, Pain, Swelling, Stair climbing and Squatting. Each possible response to the items gives an arbitrary score on an increasing scale with a maximum of 100, a higher score representing a higher ability. An increase in expected in treatment group.
0, 30, 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Quality of Life (SF-36)
0, 30, 90 days
Change in Inflammatory Markers circulating levels (CRP, ESR)
0, 30, 90 days
Change in total Fat Mass, Total Free Fat Mass and Visceral adipose tissue (DXA)
0, 30, 90 days
Study Arms (2)
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo. For 90 days one capsule/day.
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTAL600 mg/day of non-animal Chondroitin Sulphate. One capsule/day for 90 days.
Interventions
Mythocondro® is an ichthyic-like chondroitin sulfate produced by chemical sulfation of a non-sulfated chondroitin backbone obtained by thermo-acid hydrolysis of the capsular polysaccharide naturally produced by an Escherichia coli strain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caucasian subjects, males and females, with the following characteristics were included in the trial and randomly assigned to the experimental group (N=30) or a control group (N=30): Individuals overweight (BMI \> 25 kg/m2), aged 40-74.; Mobility impairment, joint discomfort or established moderate knee OA (classification 1-3 according to Kellgren and Lawrence system for classification of knee OA).
You may not qualify if:
- Anyone with evidence of heart disease, kidney or liver disease, or any other disease that might influence the results of the study was excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Azienda di Servizi alla Persona di Pavialead
- Gnosis SpAcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Geriatric physical medicine and rehabilitation division at the Istituto Santa Margherita - Azienda di Servizi alla Persona di Pavia
Pavia, 27100, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mariangela Rondanelli, Professor
IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Full randomization and full blind study. Intervention was named by "integratore A" and "integratore B"
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2018
First Posted
November 6, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
October 20, 2018
Last Updated
November 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data are planned to be available for Gnosis SpA and together with the study pubblication. IPD will be not available for other researchers.