NCT03730714

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a widespread surgical procedure with superior outcomes in terms of the incurred postoperative pain, recovery time, cosmetic, and morbidity issues. Although it is associated with less postoperative pain compared to open cholecystectomy, but patients still experience significant pain. Pain after LC is categorized into three types: referred pain to the right shoulder due to diaphragmatic stretching during gas insufflation; visceral pain due to dissection and injury at the hepatic fossa during gall bladder removal; and somatic pain due to tissue injury at the port sites. Since the discovery of LC in 1987 by a French surgeon, Phillipe Mouret, it became the gold standard for surgical excision of the gallbladder. Local anesthetics (LA) has been tried for analgesia after LC in variable techniques and concentrations. It was proved to be a safe and valid method for reducing pain after LC instilled intraperitoneal and infiltrated at the port sites. Surgicel is an absorbable gelatin sponge that is non-toxic, non-allergenic, non-immunogenic, and non-pyrogenic. It is gamma-sterilized and provided with double packing. The sponge is easily cut to fit the surgical cavity. It may be applied dry to the wound. It absorbs 40 times its weight of whole blood or 50 times of water and adheres easily to the bleeding site. It forms a stable adherent coagulum. When implanted in vivo, it is completely absorbed within 3-5 weeks. The rationale for using this sponge as interposition material is to act as a carrier for the analgesic drugs and allow for its local sustained release, and for local hemostasis. Bupivacaine will be used as the main local anesthetic medication in the study. It provides variable pain relief when either used to irrigate intraperitoneal space as a sole analgesic or combined with opioids. Lidocaine 2% will be mixed with bupivacaine to expedite the onset of analgesia. Epinephrine will be used as 5 microgram/ml of the total mixture of used fluids in order to prolong the time of action of the block.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Typical duration for phase_2 postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2018

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 5, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 12, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 12, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 18, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analouge Scale

    Postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain using 0-10 scale (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 as the most severe pain ever experienced)

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Peak expiratory flow rate

    60 minutes

  • Postoperative Complications

    24 hours

  • 5-point Likert scale

    24 hours

Study Arms (3)

Ggroup LAM

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive local anesthesia Bupivacaine 0.5% 20 ml (no more than 2 mg/kg) plus lidocaine 2% 10 ml (no more than 3 mg/kg) mixed together, plus epinephrine 5 mcg/ml (max 150 mcg), combined with morphine 0.1 mg/kg (max10 mg) instilled into the assigned areas according to the technique.

Drug: "Local Anesthetic", "Epinephrine" and "Morphine"

Ggroup LAMG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive the same mixture in LAM-group to soak the surgicel according to the previous planned technique.

Drug: "Local Anesthetic", "Epinephrine", "Morphine" and "Surgicel"

Group CG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive normal saline 0.9% to soak the surgicel according to the planned technique.

Drug: "Normal Saline"

Interventions

local anesthesia Bupivacaine 0.5% 20 ml (no more than 2 mg/kg) plus lidocaine 2% 10 ml (no more than 3 mg/kg) mixed together, plus epinephrine 5 mcg/ml (max 150 mcg), combined with morphine 0.1 mg/kg (max10 mg)

Ggroup LAM

Surgicel soaked with mixture of: local anesthesia Bupivacaine 0.5% 20 ml (no more than 2 mg/kg) plus lidocaine 2% 10 ml (no more than 3 mg/kg) mixed together, plus epinephrine 5 mcg/ml (max 150 mcg), combined with morphine 0.1 mg/kg (max10 mg)

Ggroup LAMG

normal saline 0.9% to soak the surgicel according to the planned technique

Group CG

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-65 years old patients from both genders scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Clinical and laboratory multisystem preoperative evaluation prove a health status of American society of Anesthesiology grade I/II
  • Absence of current active inflammatory medical condition

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergic reaction to the study medicine
  • Patients' health status beyond the specified range
  • Patients with seizure diseases
  • Patients with significant chronic respiratory disease
  • Patients with intraperitoneal infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut University Hospitals

Asyut, 71515, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Anesthetics, LocalEpinephrineMorphineSurgicelSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnestheticsCentral Nervous System DepressantsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSensory System AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic UsesEthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAminesBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Esam A. Hamed, M.D.

    Assiut University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Anesthesia and Intensive Care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2018

First Posted

November 5, 2018

Study Start

November 15, 2018

Primary Completion

August 12, 2020

Study Completion

August 12, 2020

Last Updated

August 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Locations