Offsetting Hippocampal Degeneration in m-sTBI
m-sTBI
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to establish the feasibility of an intervention designed to improve memory in patients who have experienced a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (m-sTBI) and to examine its effect on brain structures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
3.9 years
October 3, 2018
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Online Spatial Navigation Intervention Test Scores: Change in Spatial Learning Ability
Participants complete online spatial navigation training 5 days per week for 16 weeks. Improvement in spatial learning ability will be assessed based on the accuracy of answers to questions regarding the reproduction of spatial elements, the direction and proximity of certain landmarks, and describing the most efficient route from point A to point B. Improvement will be assessed at the end of each week and at the end of the intervention. The raw scores range from 0-15, with higher scores indicating better spatial learning ability.
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Online Spatial Navigation Intervention Test Scores: Change in Cognitive Map Formation
Participants complete online spatial navigation training 5 days per week for 16 weeks. Improvement in cognitive map formation will be assessed based on the number of trails required by the participant to learn landmark placements and based on the accuracy of the participant's navigation to a specific destination. The raw scores range from 1-21 and 0-10, respectively. A decrease in the number of trials required by the participant and an increase in navigation accuracy both correspond to an improvement in cognitive map formation.
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Online Spatial Navigation Intervention Test Scores: Change in Pattern Separation
Measurement of pattern separation abilities are assessed in a task requiring the participant to differentiate memories in order to prevent interference from overlapping details. The following three variables are taken into account: i) percent correct ii) the discriminating value and iii) bias metric. Percent correct and bias metric are given as a percentage values (e.g., 80.63%) and the discriminating variable is given as a raw rate (e.g., 0.67). An improvement in pattern separation abilities are determined by an increase in percent correct and discrimination values from pre- to post-intervention. An increase in bias metric from pre- to post-intervention reflects an increased tendency for pattern separation.
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Online Spatial Navigation Intervention Test Scores: Change in Pattern Completion
Measurement of pattern completion abilities are assessed in a task designed to probe pattern completion by presenting partial retrieval cues at different levels of degradation. The following variables are taken into account: i) accuracy for learned stimuli given as a percentage value (i.e., correctly selecting the name of the scene) ii) accuracy for new stimuli given as a percentage value (i.e., correctly indicating the stimuli is novel) and iii) bias measure. The bias measure is obtained by subtracting the learned stimuli accuracy score from the new stimuli accuracy score. An increase for both accuracy measures from pre- to post-intervention corresponds to improvement on recognition memory. An increase in bias measure reflects an increased tendency for pattern separation.
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Neuronal injury biomarker predictors in serum and plasma samples
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Gliosis and inflammation biomarker predictors in serum samples
Time-point 1: 7 months post-injury and Time-point 2: 12 months post-injury
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALFor the treatment arm, the participants will complete the intervention protocol following the first in-person study visit 7 months post-injury. The intervention involves 16 weeks of online, in-home spatial navigation training. During the 16 weeks, the participant will complete exercises for 1 hour/day, 5 days a week.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm participants will receive their typical standard of care; they will not complete the intervention but will complete all of the in-person visits at the same post-injury time-points as the treatment group.
Interventions
Participants complete training tasks that test their spatial navigational abilities, cognitive map formation, and pattern separation. These training tasks involve map drawing, vector mapping, proximity judgments, and navigating with blocked routes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- An acute care diagnosis of TBI as determined by a medical professional, indicated by:
- Post-traumatic amnesia duration of 24 hours or more, and/or lowest Glasgow Coma Scale score of \< 13
- Positive clinical CT or MRI scan
- Aged 18 to 65
- Fluent in English
- Have the competency for fully informed consent by 6 months post-injury
- Have basic computer skills
- Have functional use of one upper extremity
- Have access to the internet
You may not qualify if:
- A neurological disorder other than TBI (e.g., stroke, dementia, tumor, neurodevelopmental disorder) impairing baseline awareness, cognition, or validity of follow-up and outcome assessment.
- A systemic condition (e.g., lupus, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis).
- Any contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- You are experiencing language impairments (i.e., aphasia) from your injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- University Health Network, Torontocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Vancouver General Hopsital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 2G9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
William Panenka, MD
University of British Columbia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin Green, PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The psychometrist will be blind to the arm the participant is assigned to.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2018
First Posted
November 1, 2018
Study Start
July 25, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share