Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Can Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Predict and Improve Functional Outcomes After Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) can predict and improve post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2022
CompletedMarch 2, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.5 years
October 25, 2018
March 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Return of continence following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
Difference in total International consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ)-score between the 2 groups after a follow-up of 1 year. ICIQ is a self-reported survey and screening tool for incontinence. It consists of 3 questions regarding symptoms in the past 4 week, with an overall 0-21 score, where greater values indicate increased severity. Question 1 scores from 0-5, question 2 scores either 0,2,4 or 6 and question 3 scores from 0-10. Only the total score is evaluated. Furthermore there is 1 self-diagnostic question.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
12 months
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative urinary function
1 day
Nerve function prior to removal of the prostate correlated to patient's preoperative erectile function
1 day
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative urinary function
12 months
Nerve function after removal of the prostate correlated to patient's postoperative erectile function
12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intraoperative nerve monitoring
EXPERIMENTALPatients that undergo robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the use intraoperative nerve monitoring, via electromyography, to identify the exact location of the somatic fibers in the pelvic nerves that seem crucial for urinary continence control and erectile function
Control Cohort
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients that undergo standard of care robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Interventions
Intraoperative nerve monitoring, via electromyography, enables real-time identification of the location of the somatic fibers in the pelvic nerves that seem crucial for urinary continence control and erectile function.
With out the usage of intraoperative nerve monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients that are planned to undergo either non-nerve or unilateral nerve sparring surgery.
- Patients that deemed able to understand the protocol and to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Incontinence prior to surgery
- Diabetes
- Known neurological disease that can affect urinary/erectile function
- Condition with Pacemaker
- Previous pelvic trauma
- Previous pelvic surgery including transurethral resection of the prostate
- Previous pelvic radiation therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Herlev, Central Region, 2730, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jens Sønksen, Dr., Phd, MD
Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2018
First Posted
October 26, 2018
Study Start
November 21, 2018
Primary Completion
June 3, 2022
Study Completion
June 10, 2022
Last Updated
March 2, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03