NCT03719807

Brief Summary

This study aims to identify whether an accelerated physiotherapy led rehabilitation programme for adolescents undergoing idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery can be delivered safely and effectively post-operatively, and whether it might improve activity levels and quality of life outcomes for the study group. This research is being conducted as previous research indicates that up to 41% of patients who have surgical correction of their scoliosis either return to athletic activity at a lower level than before, or they do not return to athletic activity at all. This is despite significant advancement in the instrumentation being used in recent years which makes the corrections more stable and robust. Some studies have shown that surgically treated AIS patients have significantly reduced physical function and quality of life scores, and that this could be improved with exercise. So far no trials have investigated whether post-operative rehabilitation can improve quality of life for these patients. The initial study will be a pilot study, comprising of 20 participants in a small, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). It will be conducted at The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, a specialist National Health Service (NHS) orthopaedic centre. Adolescents (between 11-18 years of age) who have a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and are on the waiting list for surgical correction of this scoliosis will be included. The study will compare a post-operative accelerated rehabilitation programme (commenced at 6 weeks post surgery) with usual care and investigate if the accelerated intervention can be delivered safely and effectively after this procedure. Following surgery, both groups will have the same inpatient rehabilitation up until the point of discharge home. The intervention group will then complete 12 sessions of physiotherapy as an outpatient, which starts at 6 week post-op. The usual care group will not have any further physiotherapy, in line with current standard practice at this centre. Both groups will be assessed using patient reported outcome measures pre-operatively, and at 6 months and 12 months post-operatively, to assess function and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 11, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2018

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 13, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

October 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

rehabilitationpost-operativescoliosis correction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Scoliosis Research Society - 22r (SRS-22r)

    Patient reported outcome measure, measuring change in quality of life scores over 12 months. There are 22 questions within this outcome measure, which cover a variety of domains including: pain, body image, activity levels, function, mental health and social interaction. There are 5 scale points within each answer, but these 5 options are different each question. An example would be: 1\. Which one of the following best describes the amount of pain you have experienced during the past 6 months? None, Mild, Moderate, Moderate to severe, Severe. The most positive answer would be scored as 5 whilst the most negative answer would be scored 1. This process is consistent throughout the 22 questions and the scores of all 22 questions are added together for an overall score. A higher score suggests a higher quality of life. All of the questions in this outcome measure are designed to be scoliosis specific.

    baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The Short Form 36 point questionnaire (SF-36)

    baseline, 6 months and 12 months

  • The pain self-efficacy scale (PSES)

    baseline, 6 months and 12 months

  • The Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS)

    6 months and 12 months post-operatively.

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual Care No routine outpatient physiotherapy following discharge home post-operatively in line with standard care.

Other: Usual Care

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

12 x Exercise//Rehabilitation sessions Begin at 6 weeks. 6 x weekly sessions Followed by 6 x bi-weekly sessions In line with Accelerated Rehabilitation protocol

Other: Rehabilitation protocol

Interventions

A physiotherapy rehabilitation protocol - comprising of pragmatic exercises.

Intervention Group

No routine outpatient physiotherapy. Normal inpatient physiotherapy to match intervention group.

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged between 11-18 years old at the time of surgery.
  • Diagnosis of AIS confirmed by spinal deformity team.
  • On the waiting list to have a posterior or combined anterior/posterior scoliosis correction surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Underlying cause of scoliosis which makes it not idiopathic.
  • Significant post-operative complications that prevents participation in the trial.
  • Any significant learning disabilities or cognitive impairment that would limit the patient's ability to take part in the rehabilitation protocol.
  • Planned anterior-only scoliosis correction surgery.
  • Patients that are unable to understand verbal instructions or written information given in English.
  • Patients involved in any other research trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, West Midlands, B31 2AP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Adobor RD, Rimeslatten S, Keller A, Brox JI. Repeatability, reliability, and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire and EuroQol in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 15;35(2):206-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b43bdf.

    PMID: 20081517BACKGROUND
  • Bursch B, Tsao JC, Meldrum M, Zeltzer LK. Preliminary validation of a self-efficacy scale for child functioning despite chronic pain (child and parent versions). Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.026. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

    PMID: 16740360BACKGROUND
  • Chan CYW, Aziz I, Chai FW, Kwan MK. A Silver Medal Winner at the 13th World Wu Shu Championship 2015 17 Months After Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case Report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):E248-E252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001748.

    PMID: 28207671BACKGROUND
  • Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug;10(4):278-88. doi: 10.1007/s005860100309.

    PMID: 11563612BACKGROUND
  • Fabricant PD, Admoni S, Green DW, Ipp LS, Widmann RF. Return to athletic activity after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: analysis of independent predictors. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Apr-May;32(3):259-65. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b285f.

    PMID: 22411331BACKGROUND
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.

    PMID: 20046623BACKGROUND
  • Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J, Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, Sides B. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):291-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000197865.20803.d4.

    PMID: 16449901BACKGROUND
  • Lehman RA Jr, Kang DG, Lenke LG, Sucato DJ, Bevevino AJ; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Return to sports after surgery to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a survey of the Spinal Deformity Study Group. Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):951-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.035. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

    PMID: 24099682BACKGROUND
  • Snowdon M, Peiris CL. Physiotherapy Commenced Within the First Four Weeks Post-Spinal Surgery Is Safe and Effective: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

    PMID: 26409101BACKGROUND
  • Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):3027-38. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc.

    PMID: 17173000BACKGROUND
  • Tsutsui S, Pawelek J, Bastrom T, Lenke L, Lowe T, Betz R, Clements D, Newton PO. Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):E653-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2008f.

    PMID: 19680091BACKGROUND
  • Yu CH, Chen PQ, Ma SC, Pan CH. Segmental correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by all-screw fixation method in adolescents and young adults. minimum 5 years follow-up with SF-36 questionnaire. Scoliosis. 2012 Feb 19;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-5.

    PMID: 22340624BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Jodie Walters

    Physiotherapist

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2018

First Posted

October 25, 2018

Study Start

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion

November 30, 2022

Study Completion

November 30, 2022

Last Updated

September 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2018-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations