Comparison of Tumor Efficacy Safety in Laparoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Between Favorable and Unfavorable Site
Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial for Comparison of Tumor Efficacy Safety in Laparoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Between Favorable and Unfavorable Site(FUGES-016)
1 other identifier
observational
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Participants with gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST) were divided into favorable and unfavorable sites according to the anatomical site of the tumor, and this study aims to validate the overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates between favorable site receiving laparoscopic resection of GIST and that of unfavorable site under the currently standard surgical therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2027
April 8, 2025
April 1, 2025
8.5 years
October 14, 2018
April 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
3-year disease free survival rate
Definition of recurrence and recurrence date The following situations are regarded as "recurrence" 1. Recurrence identified by any one image examination (X-ray, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, etc.) and, if there are a variety of imaging examinations, results without contradiction determined "recurrence". The earliest date that the recurrence is found is defined as the "recurrence date". 2. For cases that lack the use of imaging or a pathological diagnosis, the date of diagnosing the occurrence of clinical recurrence based on clinical history and physical examination is defined as the "recurrence date". 3. For cases without imaging or clinical diagnosis but with a cytology or tissue biopsy pathological diagnosis of recurrence, the earliest date confirmed by cytology or biopsy pathology is considered the "recurrence date". 4. A rise in carcinoembryonic antigen or other associated tumor markers alone could not be diagnosed as a relapse.
36 months
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Intraoperative morbidity rates
30 days
Conversion to open surgery rate
30 days
Positive surgical margin rate
30 days
Overall postoperative serious complications rates
30 days
3-year overall survival rate
36 months
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A (Study group)
Group for laparoscopic resection of GIST with unfavorable group (Unfavorable group)
Group B (Control group)
Group for laparoscopic resection of GIST with favorable group (favorable group)
Interventions
Laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia
Eligibility Criteria
All patients who meet the inclusion criteria and not conform to the exclusion criteria are qualified for this study.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 75 years old
- Primary gastric lesion confirmed pathologically GIST by endoscopic biopsy. Preoperative endoscopy, ultrasound endoscopy or computer tomography, Magnetic resonance suspected GIST, and then postoperative pathology confirmed as the original GIST
- Written informed consent
- Expected R0 resection by laparoscopy
- Performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III
- Maximum tumor diameter ≤10cm
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant and lactating women
- Suffering from a severe mental disorder
- History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
- History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR for gastric cancer)
- Rejection of laparoscopic resection
- History of other malignant disease within the past five years
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past six months
- History of a cerebrovascular accident within the past six months
- History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
- Requirement of simultaneous surgery for another disease
- Emergency surgery due to complications (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
- FEV1\<50% of the predicted values
- Maximum tumor diameter \>10cm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
Related Publications (18)
Pidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Oct;7(9):705-12. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0705-6.
PMID: 11034250BACKGROUNDDemetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Apr;8 Suppl 2(0 2):S1-41; quiz S42-4. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0116.
PMID: 20457867BACKGROUNDMiettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer. 2002 Sep;38 Suppl 5:S39-51. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)80602-5.
PMID: 12528772BACKGROUNDKarakousis GC, Singer S, Zheng J, Gonen M, Coit D, DeMatteo RP, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a size-matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1599-605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1517-y. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
PMID: 21207158BACKGROUNDMelstrom LG, Phillips JD, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD. Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;35(5):451-4. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31821954a7.
PMID: 21552096BACKGROUNDKoh YX, Chok AY, Zheng HL, Tan CS, Chow PK, Wong WK, Goh BK. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3549-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3051-1. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
PMID: 23793362BACKGROUNDGanai S, Prachand VN, Posner MC, Alverdy JC, Choi E, Hussain M, Waxman I, Patti MG, Roggin KK. Predictors of unsuccessful laparoscopic resection of gastric submucosal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):244-55; discussion 255-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2095-z. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
PMID: 23225195BACKGROUNDDe Vogelaere K, Hoorens A, Haentjens P, Delvaux G. Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1546-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2622-8. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
PMID: 23233005BACKGROUNDBischof DA, Kim Y, Dodson R, Carolina Jimenez M, Behman R, Cocieru A, Blazer DG 3rd, Fisher SB, Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Groeschl RT, Clark Gamblin T, Bauer TW, Karanicolas PJ, Law C, Quereshy FA, Pawlik TM. Open versus minimally invasive resection of gastric GIST: a multi-institutional analysis of short- and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2941-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3733-3. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PMID: 24763984BACKGROUNDLin J, Huang C, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Wang J, Lu J. Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison. Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2577-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3506-x. Epub 2014 May 23.
PMID: 24853837BACKGROUNDHonda M, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Ohashi M, Kiyokawa T, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. Long-term and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2317-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3459-0. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
PMID: 24566748BACKGROUNDMasoni L, Gentili I, Maglio R, Meucci M, D'Ambra G, Di Giulio E, Di Nardo G, Corleto VD. Laparoscopic resection of large gastric GISTs: feasibility and long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2905-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3552-4. Epub 2014 May 31.
PMID: 24879133BACKGROUNDHsiao CY, Yang CY, Lai IR, Chen CN, Lin MT. Laparoscopic resection for large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): intermediate follow-up results. Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):868-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3742-0. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PMID: 25052129BACKGROUNDChen K, Zhou YC, Mou YP, Xu XW, Jin WW, Ajoodhea H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):355-67. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3676-6. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
PMID: 25005014BACKGROUNDDressler JA, Palazzo F, Berger AC, Stake S, Chaudhary A, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL, Pucci MJ. Long-term functional outcomes of laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1592-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4384-6. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26169640BACKGROUNDNguyen SQ, Divino CM, Wang JL, Dikman SH. Laparoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2006 May;20(5):713-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0435-8. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
PMID: 16502196BACKGROUNDPoskus E, Petrik P, Petrik E, Lipnickas V, Stanaitis J, Strupas K. Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single center experience. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Mar;9(1):71-82. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.40987. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24729813BACKGROUNDHuang CM, Chen QF, Lin JX, Lin M, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Tu RH. Can laparoscopic surgery be applied in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors located in unfavorable sites?: A study based on the NCCN guidelines. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(14):e6535. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006535.
PMID: 28383420BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2018
First Posted
October 23, 2018
Study Start
October 11, 2018
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share