Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
1,734
3 countries
7
Brief Summary
Post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurs in 4 to 5% of patients and is associated with significant morbidities and occasional mortalities. The use of rectall administered indomethacin and pancreatic duct stent (PDS) placement have independently been proven to reduce PEP. The comparative effectiveness of the two methods has however not been studied. It is argued that in the context of indomethacin, the placement of a PDS is unnecessary. Advocates for PDS insertion however believe that mechanical decompression of the pancreatic duct is critical in the prevention of pancreatitis. The investigators propose a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the use of rectal indomethacin to PDS insertion in high risk patients in the prevention of PEP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
February 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
7.8 years
August 23, 2018
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
post-ERCP pancreatitis
Percentage of Participants with post ERCP pancreatitis
30 days
high severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis
Percentage of Participants with high severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis using the Clavian-Dindo classification (1 / 2 / 3 / 3a / 3b / 4 / 4a/ 4b / 5)
30 days
pancreatitis with complications
Percentage of Participants with pancreatitis with complications using Atlanta classification (Mild / Moderate / Severe / Critical )
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
hospital stay
30 days
endoscopic intervention due to PEP
30 days
radiologic intervention due to PEP
30 days
surgery due to PEP
30 days
Study Arms (3)
indomethacin
EXPERIMENTALrectal indomethacin 100 mg to be administered before or after ERCP
pancreatic stenting
EXPERIMENTALa PD stent to be inserted during ERCP (a 3 to 5 cm 5Fr single pigtail pancreatic duct stent without inner flap is used, the stent is inserted after deep cannulation of pancreatic duct with a .025" or .035" wire)
indomethacin plus pancreatic stenting
EXPERIMENTAL\[rectal indomethacin 100 mg to be administered before or after ERCP\] plus \[a PD stent to be inserted during ERCP (a 3 to 5 cm 5Fr single pigtail pancreatic duct stent without inner flap is used, the stent is inserted after deep cannulation of pancreatic duct with a .025" or .035" wire\]
Interventions
a PD stent to be inserted during ERCP (a 3 to 5 cm 5Fr single pigtail pancreatic duct stent without inner flap is used, the stent is inserted after deep cannulation of pancreatic duct with a .025" or .035" wire)
rectally administered indomethacin before or after ERCP
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presence of one of the following risk factors for Post ERCP Pancreatitis
- sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
- history of PEP, pancreatic instrumentation or sphincterotomy, precut sphincterotomy,
- difficult cannulation defined by \>5 cannulation attempts
- the use of double wire technique in bile duct access
- at least 2 of the followings including i) female age\<50 ii) 3 pancreatograms iii) acinarization (contrast injection to tail fo pancreas). iv) normal bilirubin; v)guidewire to the tail of pancreas or secondary branches.
You may not qualify if:
- patients intended for pancreatic stenting e.g. those with pancreatic duct strictures, ampullectomy,
- without informed consents from patient or next of kin
- age \<18
- pregnant or lactating women
- patients with altered anatomy except except Billroth I and II gastrectomy
- contraindications to the use of NSAIDs such as those with active gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure (serum creatinine \> 140)
- known NSAID allergy
- incipient heart failure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Xijing Hospitalcollaborator
- Changhai Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Union Medical Centercollaborator
- Zhejiang Universitycollaborator
- Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Endoscopy centre
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710000, China
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital,Endoscopy centre
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Endoscopy centre
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Endoscopy centre
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300000, China
Endoscopy centre
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310013, China
Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2. Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, Thailand
Related Publications (14)
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
PMID: 17509029BACKGROUNDChoudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M, Szary NM, Puli SR, Othman MO, Pais WP, Antillon MR, Roy PK. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.039.
PMID: 21295641BACKGROUNDElmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL; U.S. Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1414-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111103.
PMID: 22494121BACKGROUNDMurray B, Carter R, Imrie C, Evans S, O'Suilleabhain C. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2003 Jun;124(7):1786-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00384-6.
PMID: 12806612BACKGROUNDKhoshbaten M, Khorram H, Madad L, Ehsani Ardakani MJ, Farzin H, Zali MR. Role of diclofenac in reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;23(7 Pt 2):e11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05096.x. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
PMID: 17683501BACKGROUNDMontano Loza A, Rodriguez Lomeli X, Garcia Correa JE, Davalos Cobian C, Cervantes Guevara G, Medrano Munoz F, Fuentes Orozco C, Gonzalez Ojeda A. [Effect of the administration of rectal indomethacin on amylase serum levels after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and its impact on the development of secondary pancreatitis episodes]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007 Jun;99(6):330-6. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082007000600005. Spanish.
PMID: 17883296BACKGROUNDOtsuka T, Kawazoe S, Nakashita S, Kamachi S, Oeda S, Sumida C, Akiyama T, Ario K, Fujimoto M, Tabuchi M, Noda T. Low-dose rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;47(8):912-7. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0554-7. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
PMID: 22350703BACKGROUNDKatsinelos P, Fasoulas K, Paroutoglou G, Chatzimavroudis G, Beltsis A, Terzoudis S, Katsinelos T, Dimou E, Zavos C, Kaltsa A, Kountouras J. Combination of diclofenac plus somatostatin in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2012 Jan;44(1):53-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291440. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
PMID: 22198776BACKGROUNDSotoudehmanesh R, Khatibian M, Kolahdoozan S, Ainechi S, Malboosbaf R, Nouraie M. Indomethacin may reduce the incidence and severity of acute pancreatitis after ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):978-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01165.x. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
PMID: 17355281BACKGROUNDElmunzer BJ, Higgins PD, Saini SD, Scheiman JM, Parker RA, Chak A, Romagnuolo J, Mosler P, Hayward RA, Elta GH, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Fogel EL; United States Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy. Does rectal indomethacin eliminate the need for prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in patients undergoing high-risk ERCP? Post hoc efficacy and cost-benefit analyses using prospective clinical trial data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):410-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.442. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
PMID: 23295278BACKGROUNDAkbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH, Wang Z, Altayar O, Murad MH. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):778-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23376320BACKGROUNDChoksi NS, Fogel EL, Cote GA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Scheiman JM, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Elmunzer BJ; United States Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy. The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the protective effect of rectal indomethacin in cases of attempted but unsuccessful prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.033.
PMID: 25527053BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.
PMID: 2070995BACKGROUNDClavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James LAU, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2018
First Posted
October 22, 2018
Study Start
March 21, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share