Can Intraosseous Antibiotics Improve the Results of Irrigation & Debridement and Prosthetic Retention for PJI?
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Purpose of Study: In order to improve upon the variable results seen in irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infection, we ask if the use of intraosseous regional administration of antibiotics at the time of irrigation and debridement will improve the modest success of standard irrigation and debridement. We will use the existing literature on standard irrigation and debridement procedures to compare with the results of the irrigation and debridement with the use of intraosseous antibiotics. Impact Question: How will this study benefit the patient? Currently when an I\&D fails, the patient needs to undergo two more major procedures: 1) implant removal and 2) reimplantation of the prosthesis. Any improvement in the results of a standard irrigation and debridement procedure may decrease the number of patients having to go through further extensive procedures to cure their infection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_4
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedMarch 20, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 years
October 18, 2018
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence of Infection
The primary outcome measured will be the recurrence of infection by the same organism or reinfection with a new organism as determined by the criteria using the International Consensus Meeting on PJI (1 year follow-up).
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Treatment Group
OTHERThe treatment group includes any patient with an acute perioperative periprosthetic infection, acute hematogenous infection, or unresectable infection with a gram positive organism sensitive to vancomycin and treated with intraoperative intraosseous vancomycin. Additionally, patients will be treated with at least 4 weeks of IV antibiotics under guidance of an infectious disease specialist, and indefinite antibiotic chronic suppression.
Interventions
After debridement and irrigation the interventional group will receive intraosseous vancomycin 500mg in 150ml of normal saline. This solution will be prepared by the hospital pharmacy and administered via an EZ-IO intraosseous cannula. 75ccs of the vancomycin solution will be injected as a bolus. Subsequent to this the remaining 75ccs will be placed in the distal femur just proximal to the femoral component evenly split between the medial and lateral femoral condyles in knees.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A sinus communicating with the prosthesis, OR
- Two positive cultures obtained from the prosthesis, OR
- of 5 criteria:
- V. Any patient \>18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- III. Hematogenous infection with symptoms greater than four weeks IV. Know hypersensitivity to Vancomycin V. Major Renal disease defined as creatinine \> 2.0 (See previous comments, No Red Man syndrome in 2 subsequent studies on intraosseous vancomycin in revision TKA and High BMI patients respectively (9). Additionally, systemic levels were 8 times lower with intraosseous antibiotics than IV Vancomycin.) VI. Unable to use a tourniquet due to vascular disease VII. Pregnant women VIII. Allergy to antibiotic
- Screen Failure (following initial procedure):
- IX. Culture negative infections whereby the infecting organism was not identified OR X. Vancomycin-resistant organisms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32607, United States
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331, United States
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
University of Nebraska
Omaha, Nebraska, 68105, United States
New York University - Langone
New York, New York, 10279, United States
Atrium Mercy Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
OrthoCarolina Research Institute/OrthoCarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Novant Health Charlotte Orthopedic Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Related Publications (11)
Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ. Periprosthetic knee sepsis. The role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):113-8.
PMID: 1959257BACKGROUNDBradbury T, Fehring TK, Taunton M, Hanssen A, Azzam K, Parvizi J, Odum SM. The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open debridement and retention of components. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PMID: 19553077BACKGROUNDFehring TK, Odum SM, Berend KR, Jiranek WA, Parvizi J, Bozic KJ, Della Valle CJ, Gioe TJ. Failure of irrigation and debridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):250-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2373-9.
PMID: 22552768BACKGROUNDBryan AJ, Abdel MP, Sanders TL, Fitzgerald SF, Hanssen AD, Berry DJ. Irrigation and Debridement with Component Retention for Acute Infection After Hip Arthroplasty: Improved Results with Contemporary Management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 6;99(23):2011-2018. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01103.
PMID: 29206791BACKGROUNDUrish KL, Bullock AG, Kreger AM, Shah NB, Jeong K, Rothenberger SD; Infected Implant Consortium. A Multicenter Study of Irrigation and Debridement in Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Treatment Failure Is High. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1154-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.029. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
PMID: 29221840BACKGROUNDYoung SW, Zhang M, Freeman JT, Vince KG, Coleman B. Higher cefazolin concentrations with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):244-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2469-2.
PMID: 22773397BACKGROUNDYoung SW, Zhang M, Freeman JT, Mutu-Grigg J, Pavlou P, Moore GA. The Mark Coventry Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin with low-dose intraosseous regional versus systemic prophylaxis in TKA: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3038-z.
PMID: 23666589BACKGROUNDYoung SW, Roberts T, Johnson S, Dalton JP, Coleman B, Wiles S. Regional Intraosseous Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics is More Effective Than Systemic Administration in a Mouse Model of TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3573-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4464-x. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
PMID: 26224291BACKGROUNDYoung SW, Zhang M, Moore GA, Pitto RP, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. The John N. Insall Award: Higher Tissue Concentrations of Vancomycin Achieved With Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis in Revision TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):66-74. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000013.
PMID: 29529618BACKGROUNDChin SJ, Moore GA, Zhang M, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ, Young SW. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Intraosseous Regional Prophylaxis Provides Higher Tissue Concentrations in High BMI Patients in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S13-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
PMID: 29655497BACKGROUNDLichstein P, Gehrke T, Lombardi A, Romano C, Stockley I, Babis G, Bialecki J, Bucsi L, Cai X, Cao L, de Beaubien B, Erhardt J, Goodman S, Jiranek W, Keogh P, Lewallen D, Manner P, Marczynski W, Mason JB, Mulhall K, Paprosky W, Patel P, Piccaluga F, Polkowski G, Pulido L, Stockley I, Suarez J, Thorey F, Tikhilov R, Velazquez JD, Winkler H. One-stage vs two-stage exchange. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2 Suppl):108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.048. Epub 2013 Oct 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 24360339BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Fehring, MD
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2018
First Posted
October 19, 2018
Study Start
January 14, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share