Study Stopped
The study was terminated early for business reasons, and not due to concerns regarding safety or lack of efficacy.
SOLAR: Efficacy and Safety of Cobomarsen (MRG-106) vs. Active Comparator in Subjects With Mycosis Fungoides
SOLAR
SOLAR: A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Active Comparator, Multi-center Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cobomarsen (MRG-106) in Subjects With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL), Mycosis Fungoides (MF) Subtype
2 other identifiers
interventional
37
8 countries
43
Brief Summary
The main objective of this clinical trial is to study the efficacy and safety of cobomarsen (also known as MRG-106) for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), mycosis fungoides (MF) subtype. Cobomarsen is designed to inhibit the activity of a molecule called miR-155 that may be important to the growth and survival of MF cancer cells. The study will compare the effects of cobomarsen to vorinostat, a drug that has been approved for the treatment of CTCL in the United States and several other countries. Participants in the clinical trial will be randomly assigned to receive either weekly doses of cobomarsen by injection into a vein or daily oral doses of vorinostat. Participants will continue on their assigned treatment as long as there is no evidence of progression of their cancer. The effects of treatment will be measured based on changes in skin lesion severity, as well as the length of time that the subject's disease remains stable or improved, without evidence of disease progression. The safety and tolerability of cobomarsen will be assessed based on the frequency and severity of observed side effects. Participants assigned to receive vorinostat who experience progression of their disease during their participation in this study may have the option to be treated with cobomarsen in an open-label, crossover arm of the same study if they meet the entry criteria for that part of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2019
43 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2022
CompletedApril 8, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.5 years
October 17, 2018
August 3, 2021
March 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects Achieving an Objective Skin Response of at Least 4 Months Duration (ORR4)
ORR4 is the percentage of subjects with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in the skin for 4 consecutive months confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 28 days (± 3 days) later. The modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) is used to measure skin disease severity based on the percentage of body surface area (BSA) with patches, plaques, or tumors. Total scores are calculated by multiplying the BSA percentage for each category of lesion (patch, plaque, or tumor) by a weighting factor and adding the three sub-scores. Lower scores indicate a lower degree of skin disease severity. CR corresponds to 100% clearance of skin lesions present at baseline (mSWAT score of 0). PR corresponds to 50-99% clearance of skin disease present at baseline (at least 50% reduction in mSWAT score), without new tumors.
Date of first dose through the earlier of last study visit or interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Complete Response Rate
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Time to Progression
Date of first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Time to Maximal Effect in mSWAT
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
Objective Response Rate in the Skin of at Least 28-days Duration (ORR1)
Monthly from first dose through interim analysis data cut-off date of 12-Oct-2020, up to 16 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - First Dose
1, 1.92, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose after the first dose
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cobomarsen - Week 5
1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose
Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve (AUC) of Cobomarsen - Week 5
1, 1.92 and 6 hours post-dose after the Week 5 dose
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cobomarsen
EXPERIMENTALCobomarsen will be administered by intravenous 2-hour infusion at a dose of 282 mg on Days 1, 3, 5, 8, and weekly thereafter
Vorinostat
ACTIVE COMPARATORVorinostat will be administered orally at a dose of 400 mg (four 100-mg capsules) once daily with food, at approximately the same time each day.
Interventions
At least weekly doses of cobomarsen (282 mg) throughout study treatment period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Biopsy-proven CTCL, MF subtype
- Clinical stage IB, II, or III, with staging based on screening assessments
- Minimum mSWAT score of 10 at screening
- Receipt of at least one prior therapy for CTCL
You may not qualify if:
- Previous enrollment in a cobomarsen study
- Prior therapy with vorinostat or other HDAC inhibitors, or contraindication to an HDAC inhibitor
- Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides with B2 involvement, defined as documented history of B2 and/or B2 staging at screening
- Evidence of large cell transformation
- Lymph node involvement at screening, unless radiologically or histologically confirmed to be nonmalignant
- Visceral involvement related to MF at screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (43)
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States
City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90404, United States
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California, Irvine
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Rochester Skin Lymphoma Medical Group
Fairport, New York, 14450, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065, United States
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Concord, New South Wales, 2139, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, NSW 2145, Australia
Linear Clinical Research
Nedlands, 6009, Australia
University Clinic UZ Leuven
Leuven, B3000, Belgium
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Hôpital Saint André, CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75010, France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
Hôpital Robert Dubré, CHU de Reims
Reims, 51100, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen
Rouen, 76031, France
Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122, Italy
AOU Citta dell Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino, 10126, Italy
Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
Barcelona, 08035, Spain
Fundación Jiménez Diaz
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007, Spain
Consorcio Hospital General Universitario Valencia
Valencia, 46014, Spain
University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, B15 2TH, United Kingdom
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Center
London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Ganguly K, Kishore U, Madan T. Interplay between C-type lectin receptors and microRNAs in cellular homeostasis and immune response. FEBS J. 2021 Jul;288(14):4210-4229. doi: 10.1111/febs.15603. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
PMID: 33085815DERIVEDValipour A, Jager M, Wu P, Schmitt J, Bunch C, Weberschock T. Interventions for mycosis fungoides. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3.
PMID: 32632956DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated early for business reasons, and not due to concerns regarding safety or lack of efficacy. Because the study was terminated early, enrollment was ended at 37 participants instead of the initially planned 126 participants, and a planned interim analysis based on these 37 participants was the only analysis performed for the study. The study duration was also shortened from an estimated 36 months to 20 months overall.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Viridian Therapeutics (formerly miRagen Therapeutics)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Diana M. Escolar, MD, FAAN
miRagen Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2018
First Posted
October 19, 2018
Study Start
April 2, 2019
Primary Completion
October 12, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Results First Posted
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share