Study Stopped
Outbreak COVID 19
Development of pk/pd Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
HUAPQ
Development of Pharmacokinetic / Pharmacodynamic (pk/pd) Model of Propofol in Patients With Severe Burns
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Burn injuries are a prevalent problem. Actually, in Chile the Ministry of Health has recorded 6435 hospital burns and has reported 569 deaths from this cause. The specific mortality rate for burning in Chile was 4.5 per 100,000 inhabitants per year. Survival in extensive burns has progressively improved, thanks to advances in understanding the pathophysiology of the burn and its more aggressive treatment. This requires effective prehospital treatment, transportation, resuscitation, support of vital functions and repair of the skin cover. Much of the procedures performed in large burns require general anesthesia. Being Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol an alternative that would have advantages over inhalational anesthesia, as a decrease in postoperative nausea and vomiting and produce less environmental pollution 3 and the antihyperalgesic effect of propofol. Within TIVA - Target Control Infusion (TCI) - uses infusion systems that incorporate PK-PD models for predict the dose of drug required to reach a certain concentration in the target organ. The formulation of a PK model that considers the variables of this group of patients, such as: degree of injury, inflammatory state and compromised body surface; associated with general variables such as: age, weight and nutrition, it would allow to reduce the predictive error in this population, thus improving the dosing of these patients when using TCI. Given the lack evidence on the PK-PD of propofol is this group of patients burned, has led to raise the development of this study that seeks to develop a PK-PD model that fits them.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedMarch 8, 2022
March 1, 2022
3.3 years
October 3, 2018
March 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Propofol plasmatic levels Measured by high pressure liquid chromatography
Propofol total dose. 2, 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min after induction with propofol. Subsequently, samples will be taken at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 min and at 6-12 hrs after stopping infusion of propofol.
From start of propofol infusion to 12 hrs after stopped infusion of propofol.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Hemodynamics
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Heart Rate
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Pulse oximetry
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
BIS
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Study Arms (1)
Propofol
Severe burn adult under general anesthesia with propofol + remifentanil evaluation of propofol effect using BIS
Interventions
Patients undergoing general anesthesia using target controlled infusion of propofol. Initial bolus of 1-2 mg/kg and then a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/hr that will be adjusted adjusted to maintain a BIS between 40 and 60.
GeneralAnesthesia maintenance with propofol+remifentanil guided by BIS monitoring.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with Major burns
You may qualify if:
- Severe burns with life risk that require treatment in Burn Units and / or Critical Patient Units.
- In spontaneous ventilation
- SAS 4
You may not qualify if:
- Electric burns
- ASA IV o V
- Inability to install BIS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Victor Contreras, MSNlead
- Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chilecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Victor Contreras
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8420525, Chile
Related Publications (5)
Shin SW, Cho AR, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Byeon GJ, Yoon JW, Kim KH, Kwon JY. Maintenance anaesthetics during remifentanil-based anaesthesia might affect postoperative pain control after breast cancer surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):661-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq257. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
PMID: 20876698BACKGROUNDCortinez LI, De la Fuente N, Eleveld DJ, Oliveros A, Crovari F, Sepulveda P, Ibacache M, Solari S. Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):302-310. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000317.
PMID: 24977639BACKGROUNDCortinez LI, Anderson BJ, Penna A, Olivares L, Munoz HR, Holford NH, Struys MM, Sepulveda P. Influence of obesity on propofol pharmacokinetics: derivation of a pharmacokinetic model. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):448-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq195. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
PMID: 20710020BACKGROUNDEleveld DJ, Colin P, Absalom AR, Struys MMRF. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):942-959. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
PMID: 29661412BACKGROUNDRolle A, Paredes S, Cortinez LI, Anderson BJ, Quezada N, Solari S, Allende F, Torres J, Cabrera D, Contreras V, Carmona J, Ramirez C, Oliveros AM, Ibacache M. Dexmedetomidine metabolic clearance is not affected by fat mass in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.040. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
PMID: 29661414BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Luis I Cortinez, MD
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Co-Investigator. Project Manager of Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2018
First Posted
October 12, 2018
Study Start
September 29, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
March 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03